this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
279 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2967 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson plans to cut 75% of federal agencies, reducing them from 428 to 99, in collaboration with Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), led by Vivek Ramaswamy.

Johnson’s agenda includes defunding PBS, Planned Parenthood, and curbing the “administrative state” through legislation and executive orders under Donald Trump.

Critics warn such cuts would impact jobs, healthcare, and essential services.

Backed by recent Supreme Court rulings limiting agency authority, Johnson and DOGE aim to reduce federal regulations, sparking significant debate over these drastic proposals.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 107 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It just blows my mind how evil these people are. They put all this destructive effort into everything they can think of 24/7, with little to no creation of anything with benefits.

They're little evil toddlers just smashing everything they can get thier mitts on.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Evil is relative

They’re pretty good on team Russia

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 94 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

You know how people look back at history and go "the situation back then wasn't perfect, but the idiotic way some in power tried to fix it just made it soooo much worse!"...

Yeah, this is the next step up in the current cycle of this. In centuries to come anyone who is ~~about~~ able to reflect on things will not look at Johnson et al at all favorably.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

in the centuries to come, the beings that replace humans won't know who the fuck mike johnson was.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

My original comment was supposed to say 'able' not 'about'. Because I had the same thought as you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 weeks ago

They're not trying to fix anything, just keep people down while they rape and plunder.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

start with yourself, cunt.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Calling him a cunt is an insult to cunts.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 weeks ago

Depth, warmth, etc

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Isn't that like several hundred thousands of employees? Suddenly unemployment will be sky high and you think health care CEOs are going to be looking over their shoulders now? Just wait. Mike will need his own presidential security detail to just look outside.

[–] AlbertSpangler@lemmings.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

You won't have any agency recording unemployment levels, so there will be no details about it. All you need to know citizen is that the Trump leadership is flourishing as it enters its 6th term, and all your problems that you experience are because of minorities.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like a CEO move. Anyone on his street?

[–] DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

When does he get finished with his shareholder meeting?

[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If this happens there would be a blue wave that took over and would spend the next 4+ years trying to reduce the bleeding which is long enough for many non politically engaged people to forget it was the republicans that started it, who would then blame the Democrats for screwing up the economy .

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago

This hurt to read. Because you're not wrong

[–] PoopSpiderman@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The wrong people will die due to how callous, and/or stupid the trump administration will be.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Some of the right people, but mostly none of the people who made the bad and wrong choices

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't know, man. There are a LOT of guns floating around out there to be making people desperate.

Just ask the United Healthcare CEO about making decisions that affect people's lives negatively.

Oh wait.....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah yes the old "government so small they can drown it in a bathtub" plan. They want all this cut. But also want to police abortion and trans people. Small but only in the areas they want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You're going to have to take care of yourself, and those around you. You should be prepared to !resist@fedia.io

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Americans better learn compassion. Our survival depends on it.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We must show CEOs and the powerful the same compassion they show us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

Americans, as a whole, have actively rejected compassion. Survival now depends on cunning.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Cool. So, like the ATF, the DEA, the IRS, and the NSA?

What, not those agencies? Curious.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why the fuck would you want the IRS to get the axe? They get shat on by the GOP for the express purpose of starving them, so they can't go after the wealthy

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

As an outsider looking in, I am wondering whether this might mean that the Republican party has a vision for a weaker federal government, such that the states would have more, well, rights. I.e., if the federal government gets very scaled down, is that at the same time emptying up the regulatory space for individual states to go in all sorts of different directions, or does it come with some kind of libertarian straightjacket?

The majority of the US population lives in wealthy blue states. If the regressive rural states can't stomach the kind of extensive welfare state that makes sense in more urbanized places, fine. Like a "two speed Europe", they can choose to stay behind, so long as California, Massachusetts, NY etc get the freedom to experiment with social democratic policies.

Edit: this kind of more decoupled federalism also exists eg in Canada. Quebec gets to pretend it's France while Alberta gets to pretend it's Texas.

[–] NotBillMurray@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In effect they want states to be able to do what they want, as long as it aligns with Republican ideals. All you need to do is look at their rhetoric towards sanctuary cities for the "states rights" argument to fall apart.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

-Frank Wilhoit

[–] admin@maple.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

-Frank Wilhoit “The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” ― John Kenneth Galbraith

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Our dumbfucks fucks here in Quebec are increasingly leaning towards the Americanization of Canada.

I've seen so many people talking about how it would be cool to be the 51st state when he met Trudeau.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

As an American, I urge you to fight that effort, in a serious way. America rocks, but also sucks in several major fuckin' ways.

Good luck, stay Canadian and keep up the mutual love.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Republicans wanted Milei style austerity and American voters wanted Republicans.

We all get what America voted for and good luck with that economy there.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

Ax thyself firstly foul hypocrit

[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Easier said than done. Dems can use the fillibuster and a lot of gutting of federal agencies require going through a budget committee as well. Things move slow in congress and they have 2 years to slash everything...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Seeing as how there's a growing dissent toward politicians and health-care CEOs, maybe bringing up axes isn't the smartest thing right now?

Of course I'm joking, but 75%? Why not an equally plausible number like 120% of federal agencies?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

We got to vote these corrupt politicians out in 2026! If we can get enough Democrats into office then that means Trump can be impeached.

[–] Fish@midwest.social 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I can't tell if you're joking. Your comment is making me have 2017 flashbacks

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 8 points 2 weeks ago

Such a punchable face.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At that point you have to ask, why not 100℅?

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

They need the departments that make people's lives more miserable: ICE, DHS, FBI, NSA, etc.

[–] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

It’s a libertarian wet dream…. That will fuck over regular people for decades…

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If they actually start doing this, none of them will be in office in 4 years.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think they're planning to have elections again...

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree. I didn't mean they would be voted out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 6 points 2 weeks ago

Mike Johnson and the boys about to break things they don’t understand to look cool for mouth breathers, making the rest of us suffer for decades.

load more comments
view more: next ›