this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59157 readers
3239 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform's entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website "Bluesky Stats." Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It's impossible to know whether Musk's comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder why people aren’t going for mastodon.

Mastadon (and the Fediverse in general, to some extent) has problems with discoverability and the average user finds federation confusing. People tend to either use microblogging to see what's going on with people they're interested in or to broadcast their activities to a large group of people, and Mastadon currently doesn't fit that niche very well.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] geosoco@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'd bet mastodon saw an increase, but i haven't seen the numbers.

It's also hard to get a good count since it's not centralized. So whatever numbers we do see, could be wildly underreported.

[–] flo24@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

isn’t bluesky invite only?

[–] PaulHulford@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Each current member usually get at least one invite to share biweekly. That’s how they have been growing it.

[–] PlasterAnalyst@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google+ did the same thing when it rolled out, then they tried to force people to use it before they cancelled the project.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In fairness, Gmail had a similar invite system when it launched and that's been way more successful than G+

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gmail was also both "federated" and an insanely good product compared to its contemporaries. G+ had a couple of interesting innovations, but it wasn't all that special and invite-only on a closed ecosystem is very iffy.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Gmail was literally the best. 1GB space at launch when you'd get a dozen MB in Hotmail and others, slick fast UI in a browser.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gmail was invite only at first probably because Google didn't want it to grow faster than they could buy hard drives. It gave you a gigabyte of email storage which at the time was huge. I'm certain they did that for technical reasons.

[–] 0_0j@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

"i am the choosen one!" As if...

Boy, our servers are ducktaped!

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People are so desperate for anything RESEMBLING twitter, that they'll sign up for a trash service like BS.

Mastodon undoubtedly has more brand recognition at this point.

[–] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly, before reading this comment I never noticed that BlueSky shortens to BS, lol

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Glad cracker musk is losing money over this, I just wish people wouldn't just jump into the next boiling pot because the current one got too hot.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great another social media platform from the same fart huffing dumb asses that sold Twitter... it's like people don't learn lessons.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

FYI jack isn't in control of the site and in fact even deleted his account after the userbase mocked him hard enough, he's all in on nostr now

Also it has federation in testing in a sandbox environment open to external developers, it will work similarly to Mastodon in that regard

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

"Mr Dorsey, ypur new platform is picking up, people are starting to use it"

"... I'm bored"

"Excuse me?"

"I don't want to have a social platform. I just want to make them" *Starts to leave*

"Mr. dorsey? Where are you going? Jack!?"

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

I love that I mentioned fart huffing and you automatically assumed I meant Jack.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 1 year ago

Maybe they just don't have the infra (and if they still don't, I don't believe they ever will). Turn off invites and make it open-season or shut the whole thing down. It's not a competitor like this.