this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
281 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2926 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“No, he’s not going to be president, that I can tell you,” Trump said. “And I’m safe. You know why he can’t be? He wasn’t born in this country.”

As you know a true leader has to keep saying they're the real leader

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 22 hours ago

the fact that he addressed this shows the framing is getting to him so people need to keep it up

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Our media is so stupid. The world's richest man just bought the whole federal government and the MSM reaction is "Ooh, maybe there's gonna be drama!"

Sane-washing was the wrong word for what the media does with Trump. It's more like reality-TV-washing. It makes everything he does seem like a TV show that's not real, and they never talk to or about the real people who are harmed by poorly run government. When was the last time the MSM talked to or about the struggles of a homeless person, someone living in the ghetto, or an immigrant trapped in a broken system? But they talk to and about Elon Musk every fucking day. They've spoken more to Elon Musk about immigration than to all (other) immigrants combined.

The media isn't right-wing or left-wing, it's entertainment-wing. It's just a reality TV soap opera focused on characters and personalities, not informing people. We should stop pretending it's a source of information, the MSM is a source of entertainment.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

This is why not everything should be profit-driven.

[–] Yodan@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the point right? Elon doesn't need to be or want to be president, he just needs to call one up and say "bitch, change this dumbass law or I pull the plug on your media and financing" and then w/e president he just called does the thing.

Why do the work and be public when you can brainfart an order at 7:30pm after dinner and 2 weeks later some gears roll in favor of your cocaine dream.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

“bitch, change this dumbass law or I pull the plug on your media and financing” and then w/e president he just called does the thing.

So he calls Putin and says his PAC needs another round of funding?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump’s also disqualified from the office by the Constitution. The Supreme Court allowed it. They can allow Elon too.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not exactly the same comparison. This would be far more blatant capture for the Supreme Court. The natural born citizen requirement is much more cut and dry. There were still some non-partisan legal people who genuinely thought Trump shouldn't be disqualified (though many many disagreed with them)

The Supreme Court does pass on insane legal ideas sometimes even if they allow plenty of horrible stuff too. Like in 2023 in Moore v. Harper, they ruled 6-3 against the Independent state legislature theory. Though on the flip side their presidential immunity ruling was indeed insane

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago

Not exactly the same, no; the point being that the court can pull the rug from under Trump who thinks the rules that don’t apply to him still somehow apply to Musk.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

'He's not going to be president'

Too late, Trump has been purchased.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He had to say he's "safe"? Lol wat

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Sounds like donvict is worried.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like something a secure man says.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Something something not a true king.

  • Tywin Lannister
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really want to see a press conference were a journalist asks if he has cleared that with Elon. Or just ask him what Elon's opinion is on some random thing.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And you'll never see it because journalists care way more about access to a politician than they do about truth. Doing that would just result in never being able to ask Trump a question again, and they know it, and act accordingly to their class.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bitch, he co-owns your stupid ass.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Kind of, right? No doubt Elon is a career criminal, just not charged. Yet. The greedy folk occasionally take their own down, too. If Elon isn't paranoid about that, he should be.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Trumps presidency and "The Elon giveth, and the Elon taketh away" approach.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago

you've heard of RINO and DINO, now meet the diaper-wearing, spray painted PINO.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

LOL, it's working. Donvict is getting quite annoyed at doge dipshit stealing the spotlight....

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 22 hours ago

For the first time in my life, i agree with Trump; Musk isn't "going to be the president." Musk IS the president.

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Elon is to tRump like the Emperor was to Vader.

President Musk must be happy with his plaything :3

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 day ago

The timer is running on Elon's time on the good list. His ass is going on Trump's naughty list eventually.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

How much money did President Musk pay Vice President Trunp to cover for him like that?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s been kinda obvious from the beginning that Elon Musk is Donald Trump’s Grand Vizier.

And we all know how THOSE stories go.

But who’s the poor street urchin inadvertently roped into the vizier’s evil schemes?

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

An evil grand vizier whispering into the ear of the already-evil king.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

If Musk becomes Speaker of the House ... couldn't he ? Speaker Johnson offered him the job. The speaker doesn't need to be a congress member.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mike-johnson-asked-elon-musk-if-he-wants-to-be-speaker-of-the-house/ar-AA1whA9C

And the speaker is in line to be president if Trump and Vance "happen" to die.

The U.S. Constitution and the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 outline the presidential order of succession. The line of succession of cabinet officers is in the order of their agencies’ creation.

  1. Vice President
  2. Speaker of the House

I mean Trump is obsessed with ignoring the Constitution to stay president until he dies. Why wouldn't that be used against him by Musk ?

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Not constitutionally no. He doesn't meet the requirement to be president which requires you to be born as a US citizen

Edit: also it seems like Johnson was moreso making a jab at musk in his comments about the difficulty of the job - rather than actually making him a genuine offer

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

The SC could just make a bullshit ruling that this only applies fo4 being elected president, rather than becoming president through succession.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I am aware of the born a US citizen requirement. Trump is also trying to get rid of naturalized citizenship.

But these guys are not big on rule following.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

Trump is also trying to get rid of naturalized citizenship.

No, he's trying to get rid of birthright citizenship.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

Succession only applies to people eligible to hold the office. So him being Speaker would be irrelevant. He'd just be skipped.

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

If musk becomes speaker, Trump and Vance should start to worry.

Trump will be 25a'd out of there very fast. Just you wait

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

...but he's the superior businessman?

Thats how america works Mr trump. This was your idea.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe we could amend the constitution to allow all citizens the same exact rights including being able to become president?

That would be kind of cool.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)