this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
351 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19309 readers
1657 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You see that every single GOP votes with isreal 100% of the time, tho, so vote dem if theres no viable 3rd party in your district.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Here's an idea. We all just stop. And loudly let them know they fucked up. Because rewarding them for this behavior is just going to get more of it.

[–] Dearth@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Only 30% of eligible voters vote. If even fewer vote it's even easier for elections to be manipulated

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

the most furious debate of all time will be whether the United States is owned by the AIPAC, or the Russian Mafia.

if they aren't in one pocket, its the other

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 8 points 12 hours ago

AIPAC has every politician kissing the ring at their conference. It is not even a contest.

If Russia had the same level of influence as Israel, America would be invading Ukraine with Putin.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Here's the list of voters that you can narrow down. It's appalling. AIPAC, the pro-~~isreal~~Genocide lobby, has been pushing this, in order to shield their terrorist leader netenyahoo from punishment. The bill would not just sanction the International Criminal Court, but it's members. They are actively trying to punish individuals across the globe, for condemning isreals genocide, using the American peoples congress as their cudgel.

Meanwhile isreal has blocked or impeded every single humanitarian aid shipment to Gaza since October.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well atleast my representative was a no vote, wish more would be done but atelast my representative isn't following along with this.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago

This is what Democrats call bipartisanship.

[–] clot27@lemm.ee 47 points 1 day ago (4 children)

When will US truly have a centre left party atleast?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Or centre right, Biden was the closest they’ve been to centre right so they replaced him with a candidate further right

(Yes you can point out random other centre right members but they haven’t had power in the party)

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Considering we have a far right and a controlled opposition party, never.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 11 points 20 hours ago

Probably after we switch from a First-past-the-post voting system to something more representative.

Then people could vote outside the two party system without a spoiler effect.

We can make these changes at the state level. Alaska recently voted to keep using Ranked Choice voting. Conservatives were mad because Ranked Choice voting allowed alaskans to choose a more moderate conservative over Sarah Palin and pushed to have a referendum to go back to FPTP voting.

So why do Blue states use FPTP voting when it's clear republicans prefer it?

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

When people on the left stop just circle-jerking on the Internet and actually get involved in their state and local Democratic parties, vote in the primaries and run for office.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

volunteers to run for office

gets told by Dems that they're not rich enough

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 15 hours ago

You too huh?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 179 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Republicans want to sanction the ICC simply because they don’t want the rules to apply to everyone,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts) on the House floor on Thursday.

McGovern highlighted that Republicans are moving to erode human rights while ignoring urgent issues within the U.S.

“We have a natural disaster unfolding in California right this second…. We have a gun violence epidemic, as we see massacres in our schools nearly every single day. And families are unable to make ends meet because they’re being ripped off by billionaire corporations,” said McGovern. “All those challenges, and this is what the out of touch elitist billionaire Republican party wants to waste time on. Sanctioning the ICC.”

I liked Jim McGovern already, but I like him more, now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 108 points 1 day ago (1 children)

45 democrats need to get fucking primaried.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

AIPAC is ready to fund them

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Then we lose while making AIPAC spend money that would otherwise have been put towards further entrenching foreign influence.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's government backed, you can't outspend an industrial nation on volunteer donations across every candidate.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

If their candidates are going to win either way, I would rather them have to spend money keeping them in office than use that money for genocide.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly, campaign on that.

“My opponent supports genocide. They’ve received xxx,xxx dollars from AIPAC. They’re being funded by foreign interests because they put those interests before you.”

And to any dem politicians out there thinking about it- AIPAC and Netanyahu fucked Biden. They are not your ally. They are not your friend.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Tried that. Just say that eggs will be cheaper, doesn't matter if it's true.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

They aren't going to be cheaper so add that line in.

They took X amount of money from AIPAC to put foreign interests above your family affording groceries. Isn't it time to actually focus on Americans?

[–] Todd_cross@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

Yes, but then they'll be accused of anti-Semitism because people don't understand the difference between Israel and Jewish people

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

They already are, and you are suggesting democrats become feckless cowards.

Learn to hit back. You’ll feel better.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Even more so?

There’s always room to become even more cowardly.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 19 hours ago

Oh no accusations! Republicans accuse people of all sorts of dumb shit, you really gonna fall for that old trick?

Yes... yes you will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mhague@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

75% of Democrats voted against it and 100% of Republicans supported it. The problem in this country is Democrats, because a portion of them side with Republicans sometimes.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

Honestly the fact that 75% of Democrats voted against it is actually kinda surprising. In the past close to 100% of both parties were knee-jerk pro-Israel votes. This means there's actually a good chance it won't pass the senate. If people wanna call their senator instead of complaining online, maybe it won't. I'm in DC so I'm allowed to just complain online until you give me my two senators.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 87 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The list copied by hand from https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024242

Sorry for any errors

  • Boyle (PA)
  • Caraveo (CO)
  • Cartwright (PA)
  • Craig (MN)
  • Cuellar (TX)
  • Davis (NC)
  • Frankel (FL)
  • Gallego (AZ)
  • Golden (ME)
  • Goldman (NY)
  • Gonzalez (TX)
  • Gottheimer (NJ)
  • Horsford (NV)
  • Landsman (OH)
  • Lee (NV)
  • Levin (CA)
  • Manning (NC)
  • McBath(GA)
  • Meng(NY)
  • Moskowitz(FL)
  • Nickel (NC)
  • Norcross(NJ)
  • Pallone(NJ)
  • Panetta(CA)
  • Pappas (NH)
  • Peltola(AK)
  • Perez(WA)
  • Peters (CA)
  • Phillips (MN)
  • Ryan (NY)
  • Schneider (IL)
  • Schrier (WA)
  • Scott (GA)
  • Slotkin (MI)
  • Soto (FL)
  • Stanton (AZ)
  • Suozzi (NY)
  • Thanedar (MI)
  • Torres(NY)
  • Vargas (CA)
  • Veasey (TX)
  • Wasserman Schultz (FL)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Cuellar (TX)

Votes like this are why the party worked so hard to quash the Cisneros campaign.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

of course that rat wasserman schultz voted for it.

People like that make me want to believe in God, just so I'm comforted by their eventual placement in hell.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

Not surprised that Dean Phillips (MN) voted for this, but I am mildly surprised Angie Craig (MN) did. Her district is purple tho. Still shitty

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I can’t be an American. There’s no way my politics are this divorced from the average person and I’m still an American.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You're not a 1%er, the only people our government represents. Culture wars are a distraction

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

(https://act.represent.us/sign/problempoll-fba/)[The bottom 90% of income earners have a statistically zero level of influence on policy.]

It's not you who isn't American, it's the current governing body.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›