this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
172 points (98.9% liked)

Linux

49183 readers
799 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was recently intrigued to learn that only half of the respondents to a survey said that they used disk encryption. Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows have been increasingly using encryption by default. On the other hand, while most Linux installers I've encountered include the option to encrypt, it is not selected by default.

Whether it's a test bench, beater laptop, NAS, or daily driver, I encrypt for peace of mind. Whatever I end up doing on my machines, I can be pretty confident my data won't end up in the wrong hands if the drive is stolen or lost and can be erased by simply overwriting the LUKS header. Recovering from an unbootable state or copying files out from an encrypted boot drive only takes a couple more commands compared to an unencrypted setup.

But that's just me and I'm curious to hear what other reasons to encrypt or not to encrypt are out there.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KrispeeIguana@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

My issue is that I can never remember "a couple more commands" for the life of me. And I use Arch BTW, so the likelihood of me needing those is a bit higher than usual.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

I don't but admittedly I don't do much stuff on my laptop that's super secure. it's mainly for gaming and the odd programming project.

I encrypt everything, with unique complex passwords, that I have a safe mnemonic system for remembering and retrieving.

[–] bier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

I made the mistake of not setting up encryption on my main 45TB zfs pool so I'm currently backing up everything on there to tape so I can recreate the pool (also need to change from mirrored to raidz) and then copying everything back to the drives. Although writing and reading each are around 6 days continuesly. Didn't want to bite the bullet and pay more then I absolutely had to and only got a LTO-4 drive and tapes.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 6 days ago

I encrypt my workstations and backups thereof on external devices. To protect against theft or a lazy state-level adversary

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I have no significant private data on my disks. They can be wiped whether encrypted or not if they're stolen. And I like that in theory if my pc explodes I can recover the data with only the drive.

[–] netvor@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I do, laptops and workstations.

It's just too easy not to, and there's almost no downsides to it. (I only need to reboot, once a month or two.)

Well, unless you consider the possibility of forgetting the password a downside, so for that reason I keep the password in a password manager.

In case my laptop was stolen, there would quite a couple fewer things to worry about. Especially things like client's data which could be under NDA's, etc...

[–] SitD@lemy.lol 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

are you guys using the bios ssd encryption option or a software solution?

[–] netvor@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

LUKS (I was assuming that's kind of implied, I don't think I ever thought of another way..)

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’m using LVM. The BIOS solution would be a bad idea because it would be more difficult to access the drive on other systems if you had to; LVM allows you to enter your password on other systems to decrypt.

[–] netvor@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Don't you mean LUKS with LVM on top? (That's what I use, I'm not sure LVM alone even supports encryption..)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes. Encrypting your entire hard drive has basically been a tickbox in the Fedora installer for a long time now. No reason why I wouldn't do it. It's, easy, doesn't give me any problems and improves my devices security with defence-in-depth. No brainer.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 1 points 6 days ago

It’s a smidge more difficult on Debian if you want to use a non-ext4 filesystem - granted for most people, ext4’s probably still fine. I use it on my desktop, which doesn’t have encryption.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›