linuxmemes
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
- Instance-wide TOS: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
- Lemmy code of conduct: https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
2. Be civil
- Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
- Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
- Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
- Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
- Bigotry will not be tolerated.
- These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
3. Post Linux-related content
- Including Unix and BSD.
- Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of
sudo
in Windows. - No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
4. No recent reposts
- Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
5. π¬π§ Language/ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ/Sprache
- This is primarily an English-speaking community. π¬π§π¦πΊπΊπΈ
- Comments written in other languages are allowed.
- The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
- Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed. Β
Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
Iβm in the 4th box where thereβs nothing to do so you try something new and botch up systemd or netplan or something enough to warrant a fresh install and start again
Windows: You got a kernel panic from an update just once this week? I went through two BSODs today!
Mac: It'd happen more often if I actually had software! You get everything!
Arch: While getting updates can cause crashes sometimes, new stuff is fun.
Debian: You guys are getting updates?
Debian: You guys are getting updates and crashes?
Oh we get updates, after all the other distros have spilled their blood all over them for us first. Why do you think they call it bleeding edge?
What? I never had an update break my system on Arch, even with nvidia proprietary drivers.
2-3 years ago, an update to GRUB completely fucked the bootloader on Arch systems. I remember it well because it was the only time I was thankful for choosing Manjaro (which receives updates on a delayed schedule).
(edit) Found it! https://archlinux.org/news/grub-bootloader-upgrade-and-configuration-incompatibilities/ A breaking change in the GRUB configuration caused systems to become unbootable. Manual intervention was required to regenerate the config files (I think it was supposed to be handled by a pacman hook but can't be sure).
Not break my system, but definitely had individual functionality that stopped working. But a quick search of the news for "manual intervention" items (or just web searching for my issue) would result in a very quick turnaround time.
Maybe I should go back to maining Arch.
I've had two instances in the past year on Purple Arch (Endeavor) where a kernel update "broke" my system. In both cases, the system still booted fine though, so not all definitions of "broken"may apply.
The first time there was a bug with the kernel drivers for my wireless card which caused a component of Network Manager to lag out the entire UI to the point it was basically unresponsive trying to find a connection, but never did.
The second time, it was a bug with the Vulkan drivers that caused all my games to crash within 60 seconds of starting up. Games are the main thing I use my PC for, so my system was effectively "broken", even though everything else was fine.
I am of course not discrediting your fortune - I merely wanted to share
Next update: the same thing breaks again. After searching forums, you notice a pattern going back to 2002.
Is this some sort of Arch joke I'm too stable and usable to understand?
Ohh, but the pain of discovering that it broke something important, but not often used, 3 months later....
π€£π€£π€£π
Debian stable. I don't understand why people would want an unstable system.
I get wanting the latest applications, and by that I mean end-user tools one uses frequently, e.g. Blender or Steam, but for anything that those rely on, very very rarely does one genuinely need anything "new" urgently. I'd argue pretty much never but I'd be curious to discover counter examples. Just fa couple of days ago https://lemmy.ml/post/24882836/16154377 arguing about the topic too. Even for drivers for gaming, which are supposedly changing relatively "fast" there is rarely an actual need for it. Quite often it's a desire to get the latest but the actual impact is not that significant.
TL;DR: IMHO stable system with security updates running few bleeding edge apps isolated is the best compromise.
Iβm on fedora 41 and gaming is almost perfect on it, the final hurdles are some VRR refinements and HDR. These are supposedly coming in f42 so Iβd rather not wait god knows how long on Debian for these features to show up. However once the features arrive and I run into issues with F42, Iβll consider Deb.
Or, you know, use something like Fedora that gives you both.
Care to explain how it does in a way that other distributions don't?
It doesn't
I had this when going from Ubuntu 20 to 22 last week. Luckily the universe made sense again when going from 22 to 24, breaking halfway the installation and putting my laptop in a fucked up state between 22 and 24. Caused me a whole afternoon of headaches
In my experience the only times I've had a stable experience was
-
when I actually only installed packages I needed i.e using a window manager instead of a DE (and no bloat packages which I'll eventually lose track of)
-
using an atomic distro, my favourite so far has to be bluefin which is part of the Ublue project based on Fedora Silverblue. NixOS is also great but it gives me the urge to pointlessly tinker instead of getting actual stuff done.
In the past I've seen flatpaks and containers as bloated and messy solutions which tainted my computer but now that I've tried it, It's actually very convenient.
I've always installed a crap ton of packages for gaming which turns into this inevitable mess, but with containers I just use bazzzite-arch
and be done with it. It wraps all my gaming packages in one neat container.
Me hoping 6.13 fixes the AMD iGPU issue introduced with 6.12.
Go back to 6.11
When my arch testing prod server reboots cleanly after a kernel update
Ackshyually your distro can't get "stable" in an update. "stable" means that the distro should not have any new issues introduced with updates in the first place.
Ackshyually stable only relates to the release schedule. Stability is not reliability.
It's a meme because it's made up and never happens /s
It definitely happens if you upgrade to the next version of your distro while it's still in beta.
You hit a bunch of bugs, and they actually do get fixed around final release time.
Once you're on a stable branch, updates rarely include major changes.
What is stable? I just run nix flake update then brew a coffee to accompany me for the next 12 hours
On my new Lenovo with a brand install of Fedora, DNF was reporting 10KiB/s disk writes when installing packages. That was a long long upgrade but fortunately all that got fixed by the upgrade.
Which distro? Iβve upgraded Mint on the weekend. The installer failed with an error where i couldnβt get good infos about online.
Then i just rebooted the system out of frustration. Surprisingly it seems to work fine.
Is there a distro where upgrades just work? Maybe Fedora? Or i just install arch on the system, it works great on my server for the last 10 years without reinstall.
Fedora and Arch are pretty good. The magic sauce (my guess) is that they both pretty much release just upstream software without trying to "fix" them unless things are totally broken.
I updated the the other day and now my system boots to a grub prompt; I have to type exit
and then it starts normally.
I'd figure out how to fix it, but I reboot so infrequently that I keep forgetting about it.
I feel like running grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg
would probably fix that.
Disclaimer: I mostly have no idea what I'm talking about.
Yup! That's definitely the solution
Disclaimer: me neither
nothing but lies