this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
140 points (94.3% liked)

Games

33927 readers
548 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 72 points 6 days ago (14 children)

I don't do modern consoles, do people consider 30fps acceptable?

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The majority of people playing don't know the difference. I am shocked there won't be a 60fps mode, i can't remember the last time I've been forced to play at 30fps outside of playing older games locked to it.

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I would imagine the game is at the highest possible graphic fidelity for consoles, and also the scale of the game will have a factor.

Remember. Gta V came out 12 years ago. It didn't run at 60fps on any console until the PS5

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

A stable 30 fps is perfectly playable for most people, yes

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 6 points 5 days ago

Very rare to see 30fps games on PS5 that don't have a performance option to get to 60.

Especially action games.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Absolutely not. I don’t remember the last time I played a game without 60fps performance option on my PS5

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 5 points 6 days ago

Not me. I think it's insane to ship a PS5 game that performs that poorly even on non-"pro" consoles

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Good Lord, so much marketing about "next-gen" yet 60 still ain't a guarantee 🤦‍♂️

[–] admin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (4 children)

30 fps wouldn't be bad if its consistent and stable, have you ever played on a low end PC at 15-22 fps?

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I grew up breaking games to make them run under minimum settings. Subnautica has (or at least had) a Dev menu or some shit that you could make the game look like utter arse.

Got me like 18fps at 480p, worth it #playable for younger me.

If I get under 100fps at 4k now I'm unhappy. How times change.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

Lol, same, I've played some games at such abysmal resolution it became a testament of how good the art direction was, making it possible to recognize things amidst that jumble of pixels.

Funny how we grow accustomed with what we have. I was hyper-aware of my disk usage when I had a tiny HDD, nowadays I'm like "Why am I low on storage???", then I go check and find 200GB of junk I no longer need on my downloads folder. Whoops.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 55 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Hey, maybe this time the script kiddies won't be able to sabotage people's SINGLEPLAYER GAMES!

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 days ago

Maybe it'll also actually get sp dlc?

[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

My 144 hz monitor has ruined my ability to enjoy normal refresh rates in games. I need a support group for this ffs.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I need a support group for this f~~f~~ps.

Fixed that for ya 👍👍

[–] wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It just looks dirty like that.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 48 points 6 days ago (21 children)

Only way I buy this:

  1. It is priced at 60 to 70 dollars (fuck that still hurts)
  2. It has a solid OFFLINE story mode.

If they try pull 100 dollar bullshit or fill it with micro transactions then I am out. Also I will not pre order this game (I didn't with 5) I will wait until its out and I hear good things from the players.

Just like I did with 5. Had coworker who was bragging about the game every day. Finally and picked up a copy at Vintage Stock. This is the original PS3 version only one I have.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Point 2 is the biggest for me. I haven’t played more than 30 minutes of gta5 online. Single player story is where it’s at. Wish we got more DLC.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Same only tried it once was no fun. Yes they game was built to have multiple DLCs or hell lot more story could of been told.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I only recently started playing again specifically because I found out that all the missions in online mode that required you to be in a public lobby are now able to be ran in a private lobby. Playing in a solo lobby is basically like getting more SP story (there are story missions in GTAO; it's not all races and DM). Don't have to deal with cheaters or asshats.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I have to assume they're targeting 30fps because that would be using all the bells and whistles like raytracing and running at 4k on the consoles; which are unlikely to be able to achieve 60fps or higher with all that shit on.

And, as they have done with literally every single GTA since 3: It likely won't release on PC at the same time. It will come 1-2 full years later and when it does, will have more features and run at a higher frame rate.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I feel like im the only person in the world who isnt excited for this game. I dont care for GTA, they just feel super clunky and sloppy to play. (I know, no one asked.)

[–] arun@ani.social 2 points 3 days ago

You're not the only one, friend. The only thing I care about is what sort of pricing hijinks they get up to, which could have industry-wide consequences.

Spend 10 minutes trying to negotiate a doorway or ladder, and you call this clunky?!

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, no one plays GTA for the gameplay mechanics, they play them for the RP or the chaos, or both.

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

I played GTA IV mostly because the mechanics were fucking awesome. The driving was incredible for an open world game like that. Euphoria was dope.

The first seconds of the GTA V gameplay trailers hinted that they neutered the driving. Then they announced the driving was ported from a Midnight Club game and that was the last nail in the coffin for me.

Tried the game once at a friend's house and the gameplay feel was so shit I never played it again. I knew I'd always be distracted by it.

[–] trslim@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Like, I play clunky games like Arma 3 and DS2, but neither bother me to the amount GTA does. Maybe I just dont like the core gameplay or somethin.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 days ago

I feel like GTA is definitely more clunky than those two games. Might be because the animation feels wrong for some reason.

[–] Ibuthyr@lemmy.wtf 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

30 fps

Lol, what kind of bullshit is this? 30 fucking fps. Unplayable garbage.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

you need 2 spaces and 2 enters after the first line to make it separate from the quote:

sjeuwjeb78

2djwu2hw8duj

(yeah I know, formatting is really dumb)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

I hope so! I’m interested in buying the single player game, and have absolutely zero interest in the online experience.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Remember, they released GTAV with 30FPS first to PS5 , then they sold an upgraded PS5 version @60FPS for an additional $10 (which is free on most games).

[–] SolidShake@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (5 children)

That is incorrect. They added a bunch to that $10 upgrade.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is false information. GTA V was backwards compatible from the ps4 version which ran at 30fps. Then they released an upgraded ps5 version that ran at 60fps. It wasnt a bad deal either.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I played Oblivion at 8fps, bring it on

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Always looking down to get more FPS while walking around towns...

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I know that feel bro

Bro if 30 fps is their target, I guarantee Switch 2 is going to get a version of this

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If they intend to charge for GTA VI online, I will never play it

I already never intend to play it. I only care about single player. Hopefully this means the game is cheaper.

[–] WordBox@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

It'll be a healthy decision

[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I hope they release as independent games, with a bundle deal ideally.

I dont want to buy the multiplayer on console because i dont pay for console subscriptions just to play multiplayer. I will wait for a PC release to play purchase multiplayer once and not indefinitely pay for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViscloReader@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Honestly I'm fine with this as long as the graphics justifies the framerate.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›