NBA - Main

For most of the 90s/late 80s I think I'd take any two of:

• Olajuwon

• Robinson

• Shaq

• Malone

• Charles Barkley

• Pippen

over Jordan. But that's probably the full list (Ewing is a maybe).

Lebron averages like 3 less points than MJ for his career. Rather have him and add Curry, Jokic, Shaq, Hakeem, Duncan, Kobe or a bunch of other players

Id rather have LeBron than 2 prime MJs

No

depends on the superstars, i’d take just mj over for example. the harden x dwight duo houston had. or the kyrie x luka duo(obviously haven’t seen in full effect yet). just depends on the caliber of superstars.

Nope

I’m a 80’s baby. Idgaf who the other two are, in taking the dude from Space Jam!

It’s unheard of to win multiple NBA Championships with only 1 HOFer. So the answer is “no.”

Nope

No way! You could have LeBron and KD at the same time

If you gonna even start to make that question, then you gotta do it with idk Tatum and Booker, something like that, not 2 MVPs.

I mean it depends, does your team already have a solid #2 or superstar of its own, like say Scottie Pippen? If not then no, give me Shaq and Bird.

Definitely no. MJ needed Scottie.

To put it like that I would take giannis and jokic over mj anyday. I’d probably take LeBron and any decent all star over MJ. MJ was good but his team was also really good. Pippen was a top 5 player in the league

What specific year are you talking here? I think that matters a lot - I could possibly built a case for a specific year or two, but I do think it would be tough.

Even during his later career when most of the top NBA players were aging and on the decline, you'd still have to argue Jordan over a Shaq/Robinson pairing.

In the 80's no fucking way.

no, but i dont believe he played in a particularly competitive era.

it was post expansion, with many of the greats who proceeded jordan, retiring earlier than expected to due to injury (Bird, Magic, Isiah). Pair that with a few of unfortunate deaths (reggie lewis, len bias, drazen), and you have a pretty big talent draught (not to mention the amount of talent that left the league or never realized their potential due to the rampant substance abuse in the 70's/80's. Then you bend the rules to force players into more one-on-one situations (illegal defense rules, hand checking), and a big physical guard who physically outmatches most guys is going to dominate. Then lets put him next to the second or third best wing (also the greatest perimeter defender of all time imo) of his era for ten years.

i think jordan is either the first or second best player ever, but i think his dominance deserves a nuanced discussion as there was a lot of wind in his/the bulls sails. Ultimately, you play the competition that you get, and he took care of business, thats why he is probably the goat, because nobody dominated their era harder. But, i think it is insulting to other great players, to think the gap is as big as some would lead you to believe.

I would rather have Jordan and Pippen than any other two superstars from the 1990s. Jordan and Pippen just worked so well together, and there's no guarantee other superstars would mesh as well.

Absolutely not. There is literally proof that MJ couldn't win until Pippen developed into an All Star and Jordan had a second superstar next to him, it's called the 80's.

Give me Wilt plus Giannis instead.

A team with the best player in the league will always lose to a team with second and third best players.

Bron was better than both Steph and KD. He lost when they teamed up.

If the second and third best players team up when Jordan plays basketball every single peak year, Jordan does not win a ring because no superstar does in that scenario.

If we're talking about MJ with a team of plumbers, basically MJ the only star on an individual team...there's a ton of combos I'm taking over him individually if I wanna win.

MJ was great, but jesus so many people forget how elite Pippen was too. The answer is no.

Yes

MJ was not just a superstar, he was a leader of men. these new superstars just care about themselves. Jordan demanded his teammates play up to par with his level of passion. KD is one of the greatest scorers and all around basketball player the league has every seen, but he just doesnt care as much, prob the money these dudes get paid. i wouldnt care either.

I think the only playoff series win MJ had before Pippen was the starter was against the Cavs, when we get The Shot in Game 5 of a 5 game series. I’m pretty sure that was his MVP/DPoY season too, so it’s not like he was too inexperienced to succeed or anything like that.

Maybe if he played he could have a 2018/2007 Lebron kinda run, where he can succeed when the best competition is the rising Tatum Celtics or the Ben Wallace-less Pistons, but I mean I imagine any actual competitor would make easy work of him. An MJ carry-job for sure is getting swept by the KD Warriors.

Yes

If you are giving MJ the supporting cast of the 96-97 Bulls, then yes, I think I would take him (and that team), over a 96-97 bulls team without MJ, but with two other 90's super stars.

If his supporting cast sucked, then I think the power of two superstars would be too much advantage.

Hell yes. I’d rather have peak lebron than Steph and KD, too.

Yes