wjbc

joined 11 months ago
[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Kareem was a long time ago. Very few of today’s fans saw him play for the Bucks or resent his departure to L.A.

Unless they meet in the Finals, which I don’t think they ever have, the Bucks and Lakers only play each other twice a year, because they are in different conferences. It’s really not much of a rivalry. Of course, a lot of fans across the country hate the Lakers just because of their history of success — but a lot of other fans follow them for the same reason.

I don’t see any reason why you can’t be a fan of both teams.

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Murray played much, much better in the playoffs than he did in the regular season. Many people attributed that to the fact that he was coming back from a major injury and a year off to rehab. But it's also possible that he just got hot at the right time.

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Well, I'm a lawyer, so that's just the way I write.

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It’s because I used proper grammar and complete sentences, I suppose. You aren’t the only person to comment on it. It’s a pity that such writing now makes readers suspicious.

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (14 children)

Basketball Reference has a Simple Rating System based on point differential and strength of schedule, not wins and losses. In the East, the biggest discrepancies are the Atlanta Hawks (ranked 9th according to wins and losses but 5th according to SRS), and the Miami Heat (ranked 5th according to wins and losses but 9th according to SRS).

In the West, the biggest discrepancies are the Golden State Warriors (ranked 10th according to wins and losses but 5th according to SRS) and the Dallas Mavericks (ranked 5th according to wins and losses but 10th according to SRS). SRS is usually considered more accurate by bettors, so perhaps the Hawks and Warriors are better than they appear and the Heat and Mavs are worse than they appear.

https://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2024.html

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Chet Holmgren (+6.3) is the best rookie I can remember in ages. And he's still only 21. And OKC also has Isaiah Joe (+1.2) and Jalen Williams (+1). Plus SGA (+7.6) just missed the cut.

And OKC has stockpiled a huge hoard of draft picks. They literally don't have enough roster spots for all those picks even if they had just started a rebuild -- but right now they are already a playoff team on the rise. What are they going to do with all those picks?

Orlando's Goga Bitadze was not on my radar despite four full seasons in the NBA, but at age 24 he seems to have made a leap and demands attention. Apparently he's been filling in for an injured Wendell Carter, Jr., and the Magic haven't missed a beat. TIL.

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

Rookie of the Year winners sometimes don't turn out as expected. Ben Simmons in 2017-18, Malcolm Brogdon in 2016-17, Michael Carter-Williams in 2013-14, Tyreke Evans in 2009-10, Emeka Okafor in 2004-05, and Mike Miller in 2000-01 were all RotY winners, but didn't live up to the hype.

Simiiliarly, number one draft picks sometimes don't turn out as expected. Markelle Fultz in 2017, Ben Simmons in 2016, Anthony Bennett in 2013, and Kwame Brown in 2001 were all number one draft picks who, again, didn't live up to the hype.

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

According to the oddsmakers, yes, the Celtics are favored. But it’s not by an overwhelming amount. They are only slightly favored over the Bucks and Nuggets.

https://www.vegasinsider.com/nba/odds/futures/

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Box Plus-Minus:

1.Nikola Jokić • DEN 15.2

2.Shai Gilgeous-Alexander • OKC 10.3

17.Chet Holmgren • OKC 5.2

https://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_2024_leaders.html

 

Here's the updated BPI ranking after the 4th week of the season. I missed last week because of a work trip, so this is an update from week 2, 14 days ago. I’ve added a number at the end to show how the ranking changed -- 0 means it didn't change, positive numbers means it rose, negative numbers means it fell.

The Oklahoma Thunder are our biggest gainer by far, jumping a remarkable 10 spots from two weeks ago. The Cavs are second best gainer, jumping 4 spots, but trailing Oklahoma’s 10 spot jump by quite a bit.

The Hawks are the biggest loser, dropping 4 spots. The Warriors, Nets, and Bulls dropped 3 spots each.

Comparing the ranking here to the ranking based purely on wins and losses, the biggest differences are the Clippers, who are merely 5-7, but rank 5th in this list. At the other end, the Magic are ranked 20th on this list despite a stellar 8-5 record.

Edit: As you all quickly noted, Minnesota is ranked 10th despite a 10-3 record and sole possession of the first seed in the West, an even bigger discrepancy than the Magic.

1.Boston Celtics 0

2.Philadelphia 76ers 0

3.Milwaukee Bucks +1

4.Cleveland Cavaliers +4

5.LA Clippers -2

6.Oklahoma City Thunder +10

7.Denver Nuggets -1

8.Golden State Warriors -3

9.Miami Heat +3

10.Minnesota Timberwolves -1

11.Atlanta Hawks -4

12.New York Knicks +3

13.Brooklyn Nets -3

14.Dallas Mavericks -2

15.Phoenix Suns -2

16.Los Angeles Lakers -2

17.Sacramento Kings +1

18.New Orleans Pelicans +2

19.Indiana Pacers -2

20.Toronto Raptors -1

20.Orlando Magic +2

22.Houston Rockets +1

23.Utah Jazz +1

24.Chicago Bulls -3

25.Charlotte Hornets +2

26.Memphis Grizzlies -1

27.Washington Wizards -1

27.Detroit Pistons 0

29.Portland Trail Blazers 0

30.San Antonio Spurs 0

https://www.espn.com/nba/bpi

 

Here's the updated BPI ranking after the 4th week of the season. I missed last week because of a work trip, so this is an update from week 2, 14 days ago. I’ve added a number at the end to show how the ranking changed -- 0 means it didn't change, positive numbers means it rose, negative numbers means it fell.

The Oklahoma Thunder are our biggest gainer by far, jumping a remarkable 10 spots from two weeks ago. The Cavs are second best gainer, jumping 4 spots, but trailing Oklahoma’s 10 spot jump by quite a bit.

The Hawks are the biggest loser, dropping 4 spots. The Warriors, Nets, and Bulls dropped 3 spots each.

Comparing the ranking here to the ranking based purely on wins and losses, the biggest differences are the Clippers, who are merely 5-7, but rank 5th in this list. At the other end, the Magic are ranked 20th on this list despite a stellar 8-5 record.

Edit: As you all quickly noted, Minnesota is ranked 10th despite a 10-3 record and sole possession of the first seed in the West, an even bigger discrepancy than the Magic.

1.Boston Celtics 0

2.Philadelphia 76ers 0

3.Milwaukee Bucks +1

4.Cleveland Cavaliers +4

5.LA Clippers -2

6.Oklahoma City Thunder +10

7.Denver Nuggets -1

8.Golden State Warriors -3

9.Miami Heat +3

10.Minnesota Timberwolves -1

11.Atlanta Hawks -4

12.New York Knicks +3

13.Brooklyn Nets -3

14.Dallas Mavericks -2

15.Phoenix Suns -2

16.Los Angeles Lakers -2

17.Sacramento Kings +1

18.New Orleans Pelicans +2

19.Indiana Pacers -2

20.Toronto Raptors -1

20.Orlando Magic +2

22.Houston Rockets +1

23.Utah Jazz +1

24.Chicago Bulls -3

25.Charlotte Hornets +2

26.Memphis Grizzlies -1

27.Washington Wizards -1

27.Detroit Pistons 0

29.Portland Trail Blazers 0

30.San Antonio Spurs 0

https://www.espn.com/nba/bpi

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This comes up more when ranking all time NBA greats — could he do it back when the game was more physical and soft players got trounced? People even ask this about LeBron James, but more often they ask it about Steph Curry.

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Cason Wallace is a top rookie as well!

[–] wjbc@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Last season they protected Caruso’s health by limiting his minutes. It was the season before last that Grayson Allen injured him.

 

Last week I posted team rankings according to the NBA Basketball Power Index. It was a controversial ranking, to say the least, with the oddest ranking being the Warriors at 4 and the Nuggets at 10.

Here's the updated ranking after the first week (or partial week) of the season. I've added a number at the end to show how the ranking changed -- 0 means it didn't change, positive numbers means it rose, negative numbers means it fell. The Nuggets were the biggest riser, jumping four spots. The Lakers and Pelicans were the biggest losers, each dropping four spots.

1.Celtics 0

2.Bucks 0

3.Sixers +2

4.Cavs -1

5.Clippers +1

6.Nuggets +4

7.Warriors -3

8.Hawks +3

9.Timberwolves 0

10.Heat -2

11.Lakers -4

12.Suns 0

13.Kings -2

14.Nets -1

15.Mavericks -2

16.Knicks 0

17.Pacers +3

18.Pelicans -4

19.Thunder 0

20.Raptors -2

21.Magic +3

22.Bulls -2

23.Grizzlies -1

24.Jazz -1

25.Wizards 0

26.Hornets +2

27.Rockets 0

28.Pistons +1

29.Blazers -3

30.Spurs 0

https://www.espn.com/nba/bpi

view more: next ›