this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
118 points (88.3% liked)

News

22877 readers
3933 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Speaking from the Oval Office starting at 8 p.m. ET, Biden made the case to Americans that it's vital to both global and U.S. national security to assist Israel as it responds to terror attacks by Hamas as well as to continue help for Ukraine as it fends off Russian invaders.

"Hamas and Putin represent different threads but they share this in common: They both want to completely annihilate a neighboring democracy," Biden said, referring to the extremists and Russia's president.

Biden said he knows the conflicts can seem distant and Americans might be asking why it's vital to U.S. security interests that Israel and Ukraine succeed.

"History has taught us that when terrorists don't pay a price for their terror, when dictators don't pay a price for their aggression, they cause more chaos and debt and more destruction," Biden said. "They keep going -- and the cost and the threats to America and the world keep rising."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 64 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We should not be helping Israel kill more people. You never support terrorism, and when the response to terrorism is more terrorism, you don't support that. Other than sending humanitarian aid to regular people caught in the middle, this is something we should stay the hell out of.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Thinking about writing a letter to congress and the white house

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Biden siding with Israel is going to cost him the presidency. There's no way that this situation will be resolved by next November and Israel support is massively unpopular in the left.

[–] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I don't think it's as unpopular as you think it is. The internet skews perceptions.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Certainly not enough to stop supporting biden. I like what he has done so far. That being said I don't really want us involved although im sorta fine with the humanitarian efforts and warning other nations to not get involved. I mean its really mostly and iran thing but the token aid to israel sorta galls me. I don't think they really need it and I want us to see ukraine through.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (3 children)

And that basically what it is coming to. US doesn't want to get involved, but doesn't want this to grow beyond Israel VS Hamas.

Having said that Iran and Russia are trying hard to escalate the conflict.

load more comments (3 replies)

Me too… nothing has fundamentally changed, just like he promised his corporate donors

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Democrat voters favor Palestine over Israel at a rate of 49% to 38% . Going against your voters' polling results is never a good thing when going into an election year

[–] deconstruct@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

More and more I realize I am not really American.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They’ll vote blue, no matter who

[–] qwertilliopasd@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If the GOP could pull out of their southern strategy death spiral a lot of Biden voters would go red. Against all evidence many people still consider R to be better on their wallet.

[–] Account5600@artemis.camp 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wait but doesnt that mean they favour israel over palestine at a rate of 51% to 62%?

[–] Account5600@artemis.camp 1 points 11 months ago

Oh wait i see now after clicking the link

Disregard above

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] spider@lemmy.nz 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The internet skews perceptions.

The same applies to the passage of many news cycles.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You think anyone at all who was planning to vote Biden will change their mind (and choose Trump over him) due to this?

Really?

Who?

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They don't need to. They just need to not vote. Low turnout is what swings elections to the right.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You think this will compel people who were planning to vote Biden to not vote?

I personally find that idea laughable. Anyone who is so easy to swing doesn't give a shit about Israel.

[–] bitwaba@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

A significant percentage of people don't even make up their mind on who to vote for until the election day. It's absurd. With a margin that can determine the winner by 2% of the population changing their mind, our nation's future is decided by people the day of that felt more strongly about what they wanted for breakfast than who they wanted for president.

The margins are close enough in battleground states that they can easily be swung by people thinking "ah, fuck it. They both suck" and not going to the polls.

The idea is laughable. It's true though.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 14 points 11 months ago

Israel is even more popular on the right, he's more likely to lose by NOT supporting Israel. The Republicans would have a field day if there was any hint that he wasn't supporting Israel 100%. You know they'd have Bibi in front of Congress the next day calling for more Republicans to be elected.

[–] dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago

Actually doubtful. A voter that doesn't agree with the current level of support, would then vote for an (arguably worse in other aspects) alternative, which... will establish a higher level of support?

Sounds like your hypothetical voter might just choose to take more than one geopolitical issue into account when deciding the future for themselves, their family and fellow citizens.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Fuck Biden for backing this war and apologizing for their war crimes. He is scum.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How has he apologized for their war crimes? That's not what I've heard him say at all

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

Not who you're responding to, but telling diplomats not to use the phrases “de-escalation/ceasefire”, “end to violence/bloodshed”, and “restoring calm” is a pretty close to a functional endorsement of them.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Presumably they mean in the "defend an unpopular position" sense of the word. The "say sorry" sense is actually the more recent one.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I don't know. I get the feeling that it's massively unpopular in the circles people like you and I run in, but the average left-leaning voter is still pretty well conditioned to think Israel=good Palestine=bad. It's definitely not great and the Biden camp is surely not thrilled to have to deal with it but I don't think it'll hurt them too much.

I hope so anyway, because if Biden does lose the presidency we'll end up with someone who would be fine with just nuking Gaza.

[–] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Actual leftists in the US don’t vote so their support doesn’t really matter.

Support for Israel is extremely popular with liberals, moderates, and conservatives. It’ll solidify support among the liberals that do vote, take away a swing issue for moderates, and probably help swing some anti Trump conservatives to him.

[–] deconstruct@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Nope.

In Quinnipiac’s latest poll, 48% of Democratic voters say their sympathies are more with Israelis compared to 22% who said Palestinians. That’s a massive change from the 46% for Palestinians and 23% for Israelis in May 2021. Fox’s poll, likewise, has shown support for Israel up by 17 points among Democrats compared to 2021. 

[–] donuts@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

siding with Israel

Siding with Israel over... Hamas?

Personally I don't find that to be very controversial at all, as Hamas aren't exactly angels. You'd have to have the memory of a goldfish to forget that Hamas just led a mass terrorist attack (if you consider Hamas a legitimate military force, which I do not, then please substitute "terrorist attack" with "war crimes campaign") against Israeli civilians including old women and young children.

To state what should be obvious to everyone, you don't have to be pro-Hamas to feel empathy for innocent Palestinians. I feel that Biden's actions and rhetoric have been reasonable and measured on this extremely complex and highly volatile conflict.

[–] DrPop@lemmy.one 3 points 11 months ago

We also don't know the full extent of the talks between Biden and Netenyahu. All we can do is try and teach our to our representatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 13 points 11 months ago

So Biden would rather expend political capital supporting Israeli war crimes than actually engaging in issues that matter in this country. Disappointing.

[–] TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Time for a newer (younger) President.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.org 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Only looking at the effect not the causes, pushing for more endless wars.

Pushing for peace should have been the first thing for all these wars we keep funding endlessly.

Reminds me of: "They got money for wars, but can't feed the poor" - Keep Ya Head Up by 2Pac


The report said Biden told Netanyahu that he remained “fully in support” of Israel’s plans to launch a ground incursion to “eliminate Hamas” despite outrage over the bombing of the Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City that Israel is blaming on an errant Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket. The US is backing Israel’s side of the story, while Palestinian officials insist an Israeli airstrike hit the hospital.

Antiwar stance:

Report: Biden Gives Netanyahu ‘Private Backing’ for Gaza Ground Invasion

https://news.antiwar.com/2023/10/18/report-biden-gave-netanyahu-private-backing-for-gaza-ground-invasion/

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Your collective positions on US foreign policy are goddamn incoherent, and your sources are unreliable

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] blazera@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Like, even if you support Israel...do you think they need additional help??

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they’re still vulnerable to rockets that barely work and dudes in paraglides clearly something isn’t working.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FraidyBear@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

He knows he's got us by the balls. The world absolutely cannot afford another MAGA Republican presidency and we all know it. To clinch an easier win he needs to sway more moderates and a few Republicans both of whom support Israel over Palestinians. He knows the Left won't vote Republican under any circumstances so he gets their vote plus the moderates and a few Republicans for extra cushion by supporting Israel. It's a bold strategy Cotton, let's see how this one plays out.

[–] jeremy_sylvis@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

Biden really seems to be going for the "yikes" high score. Bold strategy just before election year.

[–] Landmammals@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Works for me. Take it out of the defense budget.

load more comments
view more: next ›