this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

NBA - Main

14 readers
5 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Skip Bayless said "Shannon you picked them, and they self destructed".

1st round: They swept KD and Kyrie. A team that the Bucks and other teams wanted to avoid playing in the 1st round. Smart even said they wanted to face them and did not want to duck/dodge no one and said they would eventually have to see them in the playoffs so they may as well just get them outta the way.

2nd round: No Middlleton for the Bucks but everyone else was there. Went to 7 games, and they won a Game 6 at Milwaukee who were still the reigning defending champs. Holiday did make big defensive plays in Game 5, but they blew them out in Games 6 & 7.

3rd round: They couldn't stop Butler when he had those big games, but managed to find a way to win. The Heat could have also made the Finals that year, they were also knocking on the door.

Finals: Now the first 4 games, we could tell that no team had the advantage. They came back from being down or something if I remember. Then JT just shrank I guess. How do they do all of that in the previous rounds, and just not show up vs the Warriors? Was it just based on experience, or maybe fatigue?

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shazam482@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Young players typically don't play well in their first finals. Also, the Celtics have issues executing their half court offence

[–] xpillindaass@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Alear55@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Theyre a good team but have well defined weaknesses and warriors managed to exploit that in their series.

Also warriors couldve closed them out in 5 if boston doesnt go scorching hot on that 4q in the first game, i dont think it was that close but thats just me

[–] Alex_O7@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

On the last statement I could argue that the Celtics could have been up 3-1 with a commanding lead if Steph didn't went up and put one of the greatest finals performances ever... for sure the best 3pt performance in the Finals ever.

[–] FlyingMocko@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

and Boston could’ve won if Jordan Poole wasn’t scorching hot in that one game

This “could have been different if something happened differently” is such a dumb fucking trope in sports lmao

[–] kimbaker1@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago
[–] penguin_torpedo@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because the Warriors were better? Yeh it's prob that

[–] TatumTopFye@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

It’s definitely that.

[–] ScootHenderson_@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

An argument could be made that the Celtics were a better roster but the gap between Curry and Tatum was so big it didn’t matter

Curry had one of his best series of his career while Tatum had one of his worst

[–] Himmy_Buckets22@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

ESPN gave Celtics an 83% chance to win. most analytics had Celtics better rated

that was lowkey one of the more impressive titles in history

[–] MC-Jdf@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • Turnovers
  • Stephen Curry
  • Jayson Tatum
  • Bench
  • Inconsistent Shooting
[–] Top-Crab4048@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Literally just turnovers. Without the insane turnovers they likely would have overcome every other factor working against them. The combination of incredible perimeter D by GPJr and Wiggins causing turnovers abs a shitload of unforced turnovers put the Celtics in the grave they dug for himself. Didn’t Tatum and Brown alone have 100 turnovers in that series?

The sky giggled and went to wardells bedroom

[–] imnicenow@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

they didn't win enough games

[–] Necroassassin32@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Steph and Wiggins.

[–] Smooth_97@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Night Night

[–] ComeAtMeYo@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Tatum had a horrendous finals

[–] GenericDarkFriend@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Tatum didn’t play like a superstar, Steph did

[–] CarryTheHellOn@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Tatum choked

[–] Next-Firefighter-753@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Tatum doesn’t shrink they would have been much better off

[–] Hail_the_Yale@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

“If they Celtics best player played better, the Celtics would have played better”

Big if true

[–] bkn88kb@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

even if they beat the heat they were never gna beat the nuggets.. 22 was jus denver’s year.. id like to think if they didn’t lose Ime Udoka things would of played out differently.. im kinda hype to see what he does in houston

[–] Penstemon19@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Steph in 2021 : "You don't wanna see us next year"

Steph in 2022 : You know the rules, and so do I

[–] nikop@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Just missed a couple of shots that the Warriors made and that was it. It's not that deep.

[–] angel2timez@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly i thought refs handed warriors game 2. Could have been up 3-0

[–] JordanDoesTV@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Have you heard of Steph Curry ?

[–] belizeanheat@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

You're just going to gloss over game 4 like it was no big deal?

Also not having Robert Williams was a big problem. He was a huge issue for the Warriors, and they instead had to lean more on Grant Williams who is total ass and has no business contributing at that level

[–] Novel_Board_6813@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

There’s no reason, really

Steph went nuclear in Game 4. If Steph had a regular Steph game, maybe the Celts would open 3-1 and that would be it

At the same time, Middleton was injured. Maybe if Middleton was healthy, the Bucks would have won.

Or maybe if Jimmy gets the last 3, the Heat would’ve won

The good thing about the Celtics is that they’ve been consistently putting themselves in a position to win.

Of course the other top teams are pretty good too, so a little luck/randomness might be needed. This is true for the other teams as well.

[–] gamingnormie@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Warriors defense. And stephen curry helped too

[–] _Midas_Touch@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think that the team was built to win that year, they were a couple of years too early for their own good. That first round series was a couple of shots missed from going the other direction. I think that you might be revisionist in your perception of that second round series, I think anybody watching that series knew it was Celtics vs Giannis, that became even more abundantly clear in games 6 and 7. Game 7 of the ECF against the Heat ended with Jimmy Butler missing a 3 that could have changed the outcome. I never saw them as favorites in most of their series.

This year however they do seem to have a lot of tools available to take it all, they probably have the best defensive back court in the league, their bench is their weakest point and I would like for them to maybe move Horford for a usable big. Horford turns 38 at the end of the year and if they have him at the 5 he will be getting abused all year by bigger guys for sure, will he be able to withstand all the minutes they will demand from him during the regular season and then carry that into the postseason.

Also the Warriors were better at that point, their players just unlocked themselves, like who the fuck would have thought Wiggins was going to show up that huge in the playoffs when his track record in the playoffs before playing with the Warriors was nonexistent with the Wolves.

[–] Type-Alpha@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Its like asking why the 2016 warriors blew a 3-1 lead after going 73-9 for the season

[–] crowd79@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Warriors are a dynasty. Been there done that.

[–] BaileyHistory@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Casuals saying Steph, and like yeah he is the reason the Warriors were there to begin with but the real answer is Wiggins. He did an incredible job on Tatum. Poole won them a game too

[–] Teffry@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Because Steph Curry

[–] Wavepops@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

They played a team that shut them down defensively and also had enough offense carried by Steph to push them over the top. Warriors top to bottom were a little worse talent wise, but they were more consistent. Wiggins gave Tatum a lot problems defensively and the Celtics were stretched into multiple wars before getting to the finals. It’s hard win a title going to war with the bucks and heat like that. You run out of gas

[–] DrHydrate@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

The answer is Steph and Draymond. Steph is one of the best offensive players ever, and Draymond is a good PnR partner and one of the best defensive players ever.

[–] CoachDT@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Steph carried on offense but that was a defensive clinic. The Jays got clamped so hard.

[–] Economy_Garlic_3501@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Because drop coverage on Steph is the dumbest plan in the world.

[–] Raonak@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Warriors were on a mission and they weren't gonna let anyone stop them. That team didn't even let a series go to 7.

[–] Raonak@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Steph did Steph. He was playing like a top level player. And noone on the Celtics could match him.

And the warriors defense was suffocating. Your had Draymond, Wiggins, looney and GP completely shutting down their offense.

[–] Single_Passenger@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Caused Tatum got clamped by Wiggins, and steph was being steph