this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
279 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

64078 readers
5778 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Reddit has begun issuing warnings to users to regularly upvote violent content with a view to taking harsher action in future.
  • The company says that it will consider expanding this action to other forms of content in future.
  • Users are concerned that this moderation tactic could be abused or just improperly implemented.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 7 points 2 hours ago

If you are still on Reddit, that is pathetic. The API pricing was the reason to leave.

[–] EndofLife@feddit.org 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They are trying so hard to stop the civil war they are creating.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Just one side

The Digg alternative was fine with td

[–] Meltdown@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Funny enough, I just made this account after getting banned from reddit for reporting violent content. Apparently it constituted "abuse of the report button", go figure.

[–] Tungsten5@lemm.ee 3 points 56 minutes ago (1 children)

I got banned for telling a mod “spank spank spank. Thats the sound I make as I spank you. Yes yes yes. Thats the sound you make as I spank you.” And I don’t regret it

[–] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 1 points 45 minutes ago

I wouldn’t regret that either.

[–] ianhclark510@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 hours ago

Shit site full of mentally handicapped pedos is shit, who’d have guessed?

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

fucking normienet. why not punish users for overthrowing democracy and spreading misinformation , being bigoted and everything else that got us in this mess?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

Because that generates 🌟ad revenue🌟 😍😍

[–] db2@lemmy.world 28 points 10 hours ago

Can't have anyone taking about the abuses going on, it makes Glorious Leader look bad.

As always, fuck reddit.

[–] Snowstorm@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 hours ago

What if i think «guillotine » is the most beautiful word of 2025? I know some would argue Luigi should be first here, but i stand by my conviction.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago
[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 66 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Once you have shareholders, users don't matter anymore, you serve them instead.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 1 points 12 minutes ago

They don’t even serve shareholders, they serve the money they will give them if profits increase short-term.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Define 'violent.'

Does activism count as 'political violence' does posting things that upset people count as 'emotional violence'?

What about being part of a minority? 'ethnic violence!' How about someone that's trans, Gay, or otherwise part of the rainbow? 'Sexual violence!'

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Define ‘violent.’

No. You will simply receive a warning if we don't like your activity on the site.

Really, what are you doing interacting with this website to begin with? Stop posting. Stop commenting. Stop voting.

Just. Consume. The. Content.

We need your eyeballs for the ads. Everything else is driving up our costs.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Violent is what people in power want to oppress. Right to abortion ? VIOLENT! DEI? VIOLENT! Workers rights? VIOLENT !

[–] rothaine@lemm.ee 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I said something like "billionaires should remember that the alternative is guillotines", just a bit of history, and an admin deleted my comment and gave me a warning.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I ate a three day ban for talking about the morality of killing Hitler if you had the chance. In an animorphs sub, because that happened in one of the books.

'It's Hitler. He Dies.'

  • Tobias.
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You can't expect Reddit moderators to have the bravery of a hawk

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

In fairness. Most Hawks don't have the bravery birdboy had.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

If he only had a hawk-sized watch, we wouldn't have this problem

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I got banned from r/politics in 2019 by replying to

We should treat Trump exactly how he treats immigrants.

with

What do you mean, shoot him?

Appeal wasn't ignored. Instead, it was mocked.

So yeah I'm going to get banned. But not before I poison their AI data pool as much as I can.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago

They no longer need users, they are just training their AI

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Hegemonic violence, state violence, capitalist violence...

These will continue to not be acknowledged as violence.

[–] Monstrosity@lemm.ee 12 points 11 hours ago

The amount of censorship taking place on that platform every day lately is kind of staggering.

[–] NightCrawlerProMax@lemmy.world 41 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I was permanently banned from reddit recently. Reason? There was a moron in a game sub who kept saying that I am dumb and my stats must be shit. I shared my stat and commented, “It must be tough to think and breathe at the same time with just one brain cell.” Boom. Banned for violating some policy. The moron who was being toxic is still active and pissing other people off. What’s more funny is that they even rejected my appeal.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I was banned for saying fascists need to be hung, appeal rejected. While you got that r/conservative sub and others like it being well, fascist and calling for Liberals demise.

Seems to me Reddit is a OK with hate speech as long as you hate the right kind.

[–] HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 hours ago

It's just like Twitter. Now that Trump is back in the white house, tech companies can get away with whatever boosts profits, even if it means being a toxic cesspool of conservative hate speech (it's ok because the president does it amirite)

Fuck reddit. My ban is a badge of honor for not being a fucking snowflake.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Filing appeals is a joke on Reddit. They just simply ignore all of them. I've been shadowbanned from Reddit now for almost a month and I've submitted maybe three appeals. They just get off on their righteous rhetoric who feel they can never do wrong. They probably get off on people begging to have their accounts restored. Spam-filtering my ass, it's working as intended as in, it makes their jobs easier to ignore you.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 1 points 7 minutes ago

It’s as if they want bland business-friendly content so advertisers and data miners pay for their users eyeballs or content.

Well, that, and hate speech directed at government-approved society segments.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

[–] see_i_did@lemm.ee 9 points 13 hours ago

You’ll eat your new reddit and train any AI models that we decide to feed your data to and you’ll enjoy it. Reddits clients are probably passed that all their models end up turning into incels.

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Reddit's moderation policies are already too crazy and moderators are already abusing whatever they want. I don't expect anything to become significantly worse.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 11 hours ago

This is different. Admins have access to much more of your data and can issue site wide bans.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I can see r/publicfreakout being the next in a line of banned communities now.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 6 points 11 hours ago

I can see simply voicing dissent can result in a ban on Reddit. Has happened easily to me and likely others. Fuck Reddit.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

In theory that doesn't sound so bad, but in practice, what are they actually labeling as violent and does some violence get a pass?

There have definitely been inconsistencies in the past where certain types of violent rhetoric gets a pass but other content that even comes close gets axed no question.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Guys! This is how we could attract more users for the Fediverse! We could......UPVOTE VIOLENT CONTENT!!!

....ya know what? It sounded more epic, and made more sense in my head. Saying it out loud it just sounds like something a nutjob would yell out randomly in an Arbys in Iowa one quiet Tuesday.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 11 hours ago

I don't think so. Mods have a sensitivity crisis, they don't like it when people praise Luigi and feel CEOs should get theirs. Or that is considered "ADVOCATING VIOLENCE!!111" because I guess it's okay for CEOs to play god and fuck with everyone's lives on a regular basis but we can't cheer for them to get shot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] n3cr0@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

There are still human users over on reddit? This must change. More punishment on reddit please!

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Users are concerned that this moderation tactic could be abused or just improperly implemented.

This is the key bit. It's good to try and make safer online spaces. But Reddit's automated moderation has been bad for a while, and this might get more users caught up in false positives

I've seen comments tagged as abusive regardless of the context:

  • someone quoting a news article
  • someone making a hyperbolic joke (especially in gen-Z subs)
  • actual abuse

For well moderated subs, the vast majority of those reports became false positives over time. For the mod queue, this didn't affect the end user since mods can dismiss the false positives. But automated 'scores' won't account for that.

We're going to see even more annoying algospeak like "unalive", only it's going to be in news quotes as well

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 hours ago

violent is the new harmful

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 6 points 12 hours ago

Reddit ... punish users...

Newest news!

load more comments
view more: next ›