this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1501 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
5456 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tonntaalainn@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Boycott these bastids

[–] jk1006@feddit.org 32 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

I am from Germany and it is just sad how many people use these apps from shit companies without thinking, when suitable alternatives exist everywhere. Just use Firefox, it will work for 99,9% without any flaw. I would love to ditch WhatsApp, but could only convinge a few people to change to Signal. It is as easy as downloading a new app to prevent supporting Meta, but that's too much effort for many :-(

it will work for 99,9% without any flaw

Unfortunately not anymore.

And it doesn't help, that Mozilla is also slowly turning towards enshittification... (since they fired all servo devs...)

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Actually as much as I’d love to use Firefox all the time, there are many times it won’t work properly at all. This isn’t entirely Mozilla’s fault, but it is the case.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's really annoying to me that Firefox doesn't seem to work well on my chromebook, so I'm stuck with Chrome until I need a new computer...

[–] John@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jam_scot@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I switched to Firefox many years ago, after their announcement I switched to Waterfox and I'm very happy with it.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I've been on Firefox since 2004, trying Waterfox right now and it seems very nice. I was surprised to see that it supports Firefox Sync, took me less than ten minutes to make it comfy. Now I'm wondering about that; perhaps I should disable Firefox Sync?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago (31 children)

This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] MindlessHunter4@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Glad I don't use chrome anymore. Though unfortunately everyone else I know still does.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

Chrome? I've heard of that once.

[–] Jimius@lemmy.ml 113 points 1 day ago (11 children)

if ads were normal and unobtrusive. We wouldn't need ad blockers. Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate. I had been running an ad blocker for so many years that when a friend (who doesn't use an ad blocker) showed me a website, the unfiltered experience was horrifying.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 day ago

uBO is not just an ad blocker, its almost a firewall against malware and a tracking filter

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] g4nd41ph@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

I've started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

[–] karma@feddit.uk 5 points 17 hours ago

If they break youtube in alternative browsers or force ads I'll finally be able to ditch youtube for good.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 21 points 1 day ago (6 children)

never had a problem with firefox and youtube

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know what he's talking about- there was some javascript spec or something that google proposed, and nobody else bought in, so it never actually became part of javascript's standard.

But google implemented it into chrome's javascript engine anyway, and then used it for youtube. There was some fallback code if the new functions weren't available, but, because of a 'mistake' they didn't work and basically made playback ass for a while until the open source community basically debugged and fixed the issue FOR google, and then spent a few weeks cramming it down google's throat that it needed fixed.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

google does this kinda shit on purpose to reinforce their market position

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

One of the many reasons why Google should be splitted into different companies

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 68 points 1 day ago (11 children)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] roofTophopper@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Chrome is no longer available on my computer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Webserial is only reason I see to install Chrome. For everything else Firefox works great.

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 259 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Chrome is no longer available in my Start menu.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LonstedBrowryBased@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Everyone should ditch chrome

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›