this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
98 points (100.0% liked)

Astronomy

4520 readers
145 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just 6 light-years away, Barnard’s Star is a well-studied 10-billion-year-old M dwarf with a mass of 0.16 solar mass. Finding exoplanets around Barnard’s Star has been something of a white whale for astronomers for more than half a century; starting in the 1960s, researchers have claimed to have spotted various planets around Barnard’s Star, from distant Jupiter-mass companions to close-in super-Earths. Each of these claims has been refuted.

Now, the white whale appears to have been caught at last. Just last November, researchers reported the discovery of a planet orbiting Barnard’s Star with a period of 3.154 days. The data hinted at the presence of three other planets, but these candidates could not be confirmed. In a new research article published today, Ritvik Basant (University of Chicago) and collaborators leveraged years of data to confirm that Barnard’s Star hosts not just one, but four planets.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Good summary, but to everyone else reading this, it's really worth it to read the article. It's short and yet, frankly, fascinating. It discusses the methods used to identify the exoplanets and their orbital periods.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These planets are in remarkably close quarters, with periods of just 2.34, 3.15, 4.12, and 6.74 days.

Speedy little guys

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The furthest of the four is estimated to have an orbital radius of about 0.03 AU. That's 1/10th the size of Mercury's orbit around the sun!

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a fuel scooping range.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

Warning, temperature critical.

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

850°C apparent temperature 830°C. Stay hydrated.

[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

"Hot planets are waiting for you in the star's neighborhood!"

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Read the source as “assnova.com”

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Some asses are so THICC they just collapse into themselves in an explosion of seductive destruction that can be seen light years away

[–] haroldfinch@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wonderful confirmation.

To think how hard it is to confirm these planets, for such a relatively close star. When we have already confirmed so much about objects at far greater distances.

Hard to comprehend these achievements from our individual perspectives. 👏

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago

I wonder if Kepler or others would have found these planets had Barnard's Star been in the areas searched? I.e., very small planets in close orbits around a dim star is a very difficult target, period. This also means that the thousands of systems we now know about certainly have far more than the few bodies we've detected because we can only see the biggest ones well.

[–] egrets@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately we'll never get to visit them in person if Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz has anything to say about it:

We are about to jump into hyperspace for the journey to Barnard’s Star. On arrival we will stay in dock for a seventy-two-hour refit, and no one’s to leave the ship during that time. I repeat, all planet leave is canceled. I’ve just had an unhappy love affair, so I don’t see why anybody else should have a good time.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And we've made our first step towards the Time Tombs.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Late stage Kassad needs to get his ass to Earth, we need him.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Fucking knew it!