John mama
196
Community Rules
You must post before you leave
Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).
Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.
Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.
Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".
Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.
Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.
Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.
Avoid AI generated content.
Avoid misinformation.
Avoid incomprehensible posts.
No threats or personal attacks.
No spam.
Moderator Guidelines
Moderator Guidelines
- Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
- Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
- When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
- Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
- Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
- Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
- Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
- Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
- Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
- Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
- Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
- Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
- First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
- Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
- No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
- Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
- Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.
This is actually an interesting question.
The 4 canon gospels do not actually have any hard evidence indicating who actually wrote them.
They initially circulated for decades, without titles, without recorded authors, anonymous attribution... untill eventually names were just assigned to them around 200 AD/CE, roughly 130 to 90 years after they were first written.
https://ehrmanblog.org/when-did-the-gospels-get-their-names/
Bart Ehrman isn't just some random guy with a blog, he's one of the most academically influential and well known Biblical scholars, got a PhD around 1985, been publishing papers and books on this sort of stuff longer than I've been alive.
Imagine spending your whole life just trying to piece together every piece of bullshit lies the Catholic church ever spewed. It feels sad to me.
The stories don't have to be true for the actual history of who did what and why to be interesting.
Academia doesn't and shouldn't care to cover anything up or leave any stone unturned. All knowledge is important.
Also, should we be worried that he had to specify that he was the 25th iteration of the 11th version?
I thought he said it just before lunch
Ah, that makes more sense.
-Tooth 0942 UTC
Maybe it was the current score when he said it, john had 11 points and his opponent had 25
It's me, John Bible.
Saw a weird up-tick of these comment-box missionaries lately.
Select the 3 dots, click report, reason: misinformation.
He's the guy the toilets are named after.
John deez nuts!
Just scroll to minute 11 and 25th second, and it's the guy ~~standing behind you~~ on the screen
That's the fun part: We don't know!
John Squire isn’t it?
Ah, yep. Ol’ “John 11:25”, they call ‘im.
Erm, I think you'll find it was Our Lord Ian Brown who said that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vY9g-PgSiGA