this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
366 points (99.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5055 readers
489 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml 55 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This was not news 20 years ago, and it is not really news today. These are people willing to destroy everything for just a few dollars more. You can argue that if it was not them, then it would be someone else. But that is why the system needs to be dismantled. Capitalism will fight any attempt towards fixing climate change. Systems wants to sustain themselves, if a sick system is causing damages, then it needs to go. It is the only way.

[–] Starglasses@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

History is not news

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Take all their money

[–] bearwithastick@feddit.ch 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What I really, really do not understand about these companies is that they could have easily played both sides and come up on top anyway. They could have continued to make a shit ton of money with oil and simultaniously invest in renewable energies and become the big players in that field too.

But I guess paying off corrupt politicans is much easier.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Change costs $.

Doesn’t matter if it’s 1970 or today.

Plus they’d be bucking all the other petro companies trying to sway public opinion in favor of the status quo.

So they went with cheap and easy.

And here we are.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

As long as conservatives have the power to defend fossil fuel megacorps, the world will continue to burn. If you aren't fighting conservatism, you aren't fighting climate change. Period.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 months ago

Exxon Mobil continues to fund and build Carbon Bomb projects.

CarbonBombs.org