this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
205 points (97.7% liked)

politics

22815 readers
4448 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lupusblackfur@lemmy.world 102 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The authors of the Constitution separated powers for a reason.

That's all well and good until at least one of those branches utterly and completely abdicates its duties...

🙄 🤡 🖕 🖕

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

You misspelled “kisses the ass of the dictator”.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kind of feels like all three branches have done that. Congress isn't holding the executive or the courts to account, the court is splitting the power transfer with the executive branch to avoid being made outright irrelevant, and the executive branch is acting like a monarchy.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The system was invented to profit from enslaving people. They're still doing their "best".

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Boy it's a good thing Trump isn't wiping his ass with the constitution then, huh?

Give me a fucking break. The constitution is worthless if it gets ignored and nobody does anything about it.

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yep the system was built on good faith and the idea that at least one of these branches would do better.

If I were to rebuild the system I'd probably push greater power to state legislatures and the people of the state over their congressional representatives. For example say a 2/3rds majority of a state senate can recall a congressman and trigger reelection. Then every state should also have a way for the people directly to trigger recall elections.

Elections for the house and senate also need to occur yearly or every other year. Imagine if 1/4th of senate seats were elected every year.

We need to expand congress. 2 senators per state was for when the US had way less people. Why not bump it up to 3? The house of Representatives could also use another 100+ seats added.

Finally put term limits on the Supreme Court and introduce ranked choice voting.

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A parliamentary system is superior in just about every way.

[–] cyphear@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Shh, don't say the P-word. Call it proportional representation. Anything that sounds too British is almost certainly doomed.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The constitution is worthless because it's an outdated pact between literal slavers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Reminds me of that Yogi Berra quote: "In theory, theory and practice are the same thing. In practice, they're not."

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Bit early for takes like that, no? Americans still have the whole dictatorship ahead of them, we’re currently seeing it being established.

[–] kinsnik@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

the article is about how dictatorships are a worse form of government than republics. It means that dictatorships fail because they creates poorer and worse countries. not that they fails because they are not able to maintain themselves

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

When the separated powers are all stacked by the same side it is why a dictatorship could succeed.

There must be more immediate consequences for anyone who seeks to sidestep its purpose.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Pretty sure the people who wrote the constitution inspired the nazis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

[–] Bonus@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

https://archive.ph/2FQDw

the system created by that first Constitutional Congress has comprehensively failed.