this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
338 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

59402 readers
3048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 70 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Will they change their name to Wedidn'tWork?

[–] abobla@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wew Ork, a new mercenary outfit for Russia.

[–] Corran1138@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Don't give them any ideas.

We(the rich don't)Work

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh it worked. They made a shit-ton, paid the execs, and then had no more money. That was the plan. 100% success.

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I get that they can argue they didn't deliberately do it, but there must be some kind of law that can be used to sue the execs and shareholders for doing that (if proven), right?

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I love your optimism. Truly. But no law says a company can’t drain the bank account on salaries and bonuses and then be “shocked” when there isn’t enough money to keep the lights on.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Sue the shareholders?

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Uber and AirBnB next.

I still don't quite understand why a "taxi" and a "hotel" company are considered tech companies.

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Because they both disrupted their respective markets with little more than an app.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don’t quite understand how MargotRobbie is on Lemmy moderating an android community.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because I have way too much free time now that I'm on strike, and it's also really funny.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

squints Not sure whether to be star struck or suspicious. If it’s really you, I hope you get the word out about Lemmy IRL, so we can grow this place. Can’t think of a better Lemmy spokesperson than Barbie.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does MargotRobbie know so much about Visual Studio, C#, and Python?

https://lemm.ee/comment/5424323

Nothing in her bio implies a background in programming.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Learned it during her Quinn years?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

The tech bit just seems to be the ability to slurp money out of other people's industries, while avoiding all regulation and responsibility.

You can stick the food delivery people with them.

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 32 points 1 year ago

Oh no! Anyway…

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any idea if this is a proper (shut down) bankruptcy, or a get cheaper leases bankruptcy?

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

It’s a “we paid our execs all our cash” bankruptcy

[–] wmassingham@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's in the article:

New York-based WeWork is considering filing a Chapter 11 petition in New Jersey

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that's the restructuring one? Does that let them escape or decrease their leases?

(Not familiar with American bankruptcy laws(...or any bankruptcy laws))

[–] wjrii@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Yup, 11 is the restructuring one. Very little will happen automatically, but they will try to renegotiate their leases. In a world where big companies are adjusting to WFH being a norm, though no longer the the norm, this has the feeling of pissing on a house fire. When their Chapter 11 restructuring fails, that's when they'll file for Chapter 7 (liquidation)

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

They're still here???

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So... most people are not into paying expensive dues to use a desk? Who knew.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I use a co-working space every day. It's normal

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Genuinely not sure what the business model was here, or how it attracted so many investors.

"So we get a bunch of office space, right? And then we rent it out not to companies, but to individuals, who then get all the downsides of working in a distracting room full of noisy bastards, while not actually interacting with any of the people they're supposed to be working with."

"I'm in! How much do you need?"

[–] Tire@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

You just described how regular office jobs are 😆

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Oct 31 (Reuters) - WeWork (WE.N) plans to file for bankruptcy as early as next week, a source familiar with the matter said on Tuesday, as the SoftBank Group-backed company struggles with a massive debt pile and hefty losses.

New York-based WeWork is considering filing a Chapter 11 petition in New Jersey, the WSJ reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

Earlier on Tuesday, WeWork said it had entered into an agreement with creditors for temporary postponement of payments for some of its debt, with the grace period nearing an end.

The company has been in turmoil ever since its plans to go public in 2019 imploded following investors' skepticism over its business model of taking long-term leases and renting them for the short term and worries over its hefty losses.

Its major backer, Japanese conglomerate SoftBank, sunk tens of billions to prop up the startup, but the company has continued to lose money.

WeWork raised "substantial doubt" about its ability to continue operations in August, with numerous top executives, including CEO Sandeep Mathrani, departing this year.


The original article contains 296 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 40%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

'this guy' is already out. Made billions

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Haven't they been circling the drain for some time now?

[–] wabafee@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago
[–] LinusOnLemmyWld@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is it just me, or is this the wrong community for this. WeWork isn't a tech company or product.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I used to work for a tech company that rented a corner office in a WeWork

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This community seems to have become a catch-all for whatever.

[–] Steve 2 points 1 year ago

It does seem that way.

[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

WeFailedToWork

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

WeWork was nothing but a scam to fleece money from investors. Only a fool would believe a real estate company is a tech company. And that fool is Masayoshi Son.

[–] Hypx@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

There will come a day when people will realize that even tech companies aren't worth that much.