this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
247 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

69041 readers
3112 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] power@lemm.ee 1 points 21 minutes ago

clunker dunker blunker

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago

As if I needed more reasons to dislike HP as a company

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 14 points 10 hours ago

The lawsuit applies to customers who bought HP desktops, laptops, mice or keyboards advertised as being discounted for more than 75% of the time between June 5, 2021 and October 28, 2024.

One of the examples given was a $999.99 HP All-in-One machine bought by a plaintiff in September 2021. It was advertised as having $100 off, marked at $899.99, however it had been sold at that lower price since April 2021.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 29 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

4 million dollars

So, a slap on the wrist.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Cost of doing business.

[–] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not like HP is rolling in coin, but even for them $4m is probably less than they made from the actual infraction. Make it all make sense.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

These fines should really be based on the infraction profits times 100. To make sure you ripped out all benefits of doing these scams. Company goes bankrupt? Too bad. Why would we want to keep illegally operating businesses around anyway.

[–] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Fines are for the poor. Always have been. Rich people pay “fines” like you wipe your ass.

[–] Decq@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

And then suddenly they start complaining when a Luigi turns up

[–] Exec@pawb.social 58 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Why the fuck false advertising is in quotes?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

When you see quotes in headlines, it's because someone said those exact words. Journalist don't use the sarcastic "quotes".

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

"If you put everything in quotes is like other people said it and you can't get in trouble."

[–] skooma_king@lemm.ee 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They don’t want to get sued, probably.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

"False news"

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

HP sucks, their products suck, and I hope they crash and burn

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I had an HP laptop that melted, but they voided the warranty when I unplugged it to stop it melting.

I avoided their products since then. Fucking $1200 gone.

I also have an HP printer and if I were to ever use HP toner it’s over $1000 for the 4 toners. But the generics are way under $100.

I avoid HP!

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I once had a HP laptop, then the hinge got rougher, it became harder to open it up, then the screen popped off and the hinge broke

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 59 minutes ago

I had 2 HP laptops with hinge issues, they broke the motherboard

[–] axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Lol. 4 mil is absolutely nothing

[–] Mooseford@lemmy.today 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Dr. Evil would tend to disagree.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 13 hours ago

MUAHAHAHAHA!

[–] FawkesGil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Good! Fuck HP and their anti-consumer practices!

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago

Yeah ok I guess, but the fact that they settled means they likely would have had to pay much more had this gone to court.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 14 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Hasn’t Kohl’s done this for years?

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

the difference is HP is the actual manufacturer who sets MSRP. I don’t think Kohls manufactures anything, they are just a retailer.

[–] digger@lemmy.ca 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, and JC Penny crashed and burned after switching their marketing strategy away from fake "regular prices."

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I read that. New leadership felt that the eternal sales stuff was bad and changed to "everyday low prices" sort of thing thinking the customers would appreciate the transparency. Nope, the fake "on sale" works.

It's all over the place in sales across every industry. I think it is dumb but I am surprised someone actually got a lawsuit against it.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

My naive reading is the difference here is HP slapped a discount sticker on it without changing the price.

Where Kohls, et. al. set the price extremely high and then always have it "on sale."

Now, how companies get away with doing the same thing for Black Friday, no idea

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

the difference is HP is the actual manufacturer who sets MSRP. I don't think Kohls manufactures anything, they are just a retailer.