Apostrophe catastrophe.

Oh, there are forks: #2.

Gotta go with 1

It's a trick question, they're all bad.

(I have autism)

Neurodivergents*

Obviously depends on what you're about to eat

It was between 2, 4 and 5, but 4 is my final pick

2 its just right

3 > 1 & 4 >> 5 >>>>>>> 2

2, and only 2.

2. 1 is also nice, every other choice is heresy.

I don't really like any of these.
Ideally, #3's head on #1's handle

Edit: I'm torn between the head of 2 and 3
2's head is more satisfying, but 3 is more practical for spoon-adjacent tasks like scooping rice

2, 5 if there are no clean 2s

Handle of 5 + the fork of 3

2. Slim fork, wide handle.

I'd pick 5 but none of these look all that comfy

2, if I wanted it to be round, I'd have grabbed a spoon.

Also team 2

It depends.

1 is the one you leave in the drawer till it's the last one or use for stuff you don't want to risk your other forks for...

3 speaks to me I like 😋😋

number 5 for its solid structure and good distance between prongs

All but 5 look like cheap crap and I don't like 5 for forks sake

Def 3

2 and 3. 1 and 5 are too short, they're last resort shit

None of these. 2 has the best tines, but the handle sucks. These look like forks you'd find in a diner. Rounded outer tines is a crime against humanity. Did you maybe want a spork instead? 😡

Clearly its the tines of 2 and the handle of 5. Anything else is madness.

My reasoning is quite simple. The tines on the No.2 fork are longer than the others. Long things are often associated with quality, status and refinement (Long fingers, long lashes, long legs etc.). The extra length suggest dexterity and precision.

Conversely the comparatively stubby tines of the No.1 fork would likely suit a toddler or an adult who isn't allowed near pointy things without supervision. Similarly the tines of the No.5 fork suggest that this utensil was born wanting to be a spoon but then was made into a fork at the last minute. This hypothesis is further supported by the rounded end of it's handle which would suit a spoon rather well.

Numbers 3 and 4 forks are usually, in my experience found in establishments where you help yourself to cutlery from big pots with grubby labels marked "SPOONS", "KNIVES" and "FORKS".

Now to the handles. Although the tines of the No.2 fork are pleasing, it then lets itself down with a handle that widens to the point of absurdity. Perhaps the thought was that it would help the extremely aged keep a firm grip while spooning tapioca past loose dentures.

So a cleaned up fork made from an amalgam of the refined tines of No. 2 fork and the pleasantly rounded handle of No. 5 are the only option for any adult with reasonable dexterity.

I want to say 2 because longest fork depth, but 4 has that round mouth feel with still good fork depth without being too aggressive about the curvature like 5. The thicker outer prongs grip slippery/heavy food better too.

I'm going 4.

Also because 2 has that annoying fin. The worst forks do that, and also curve down. Hurts my hands, but I'm a giant with bear paws so YMMV.