this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2025
251 points (96.3% liked)

Games

18739 readers
731 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's an MMO, you fucking idiots. Of course it's online only.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that no one asked for an MMO. The game series always offered singleplayer. The gameplay is likely made worse by being an MMO. People who are not fans of the series can just skip this game, but those who are fans of the so-far-singleplayer series are those who are asking for a singleplayer experience.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 1 points 1 minute ago

I'll never understand why a certain subset of people are so adamantly against multiplayer games. Y'all are so loud and annoying.

Single player AI is often repetitive and boring; the unpredictability of human players is what makes online games so much fun. You people should take those sticks out of your asses and give them a try sometime. You mind find that you like them.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm not buying or spending money in any more games with a killswitch

[–] Trollception@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

It's free to play

[–] simop_jo@lemm.ee 9 points 9 hours ago

Fuck online only games

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Free online multiplayer game doesn't have an offline mode? How bizarre.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago

People expect something different, because the Skate series was different up until now. They should've branded it differently, if they didn't want fans asking for singleplayer.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't understand why games don't have two modes: paid, offline single player experience, and F2P online multiplayer experience. The former ensures the game will survive once the servers shut down, and the latter is a gravy train if it works out. Surely that doesn't add much to the development time...

[–] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

Pretty sure the new Call of Duty games work like that.

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I'll play SKATE on RPCS3.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What is good about Skate? Honest question to a true die hard fans.

It is a skill and learning curve game, right?

[–] CoopaLoopa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Tony hawk games were the only other skating games, but they had button-press controls and goofy physics. Skate came out with much more realistic physics and the thumbstick flicking controls that made tricks feel purposeful. I think people who do skate (or wanted to) got pulled in for the realistic skating lines and tricks. There was also still enough over-the-top jumps and tricks to keep younger kids entertained.

[–] PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

Yes, with an emphasis on street skating specifically, and it just feels great to play and nail lines of flip tricks and rails.

[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 29 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Hot take: If its a free to play online multiplayer game, its not very upsetting.

Yeah, fans want another skate in the vein of the trilogy and it sucks we wont get that... But if i dont have to buy this game then idc if it will hit a premature death when it stops being supported. Yeah its a waste of development resources and i wish online-only games didnt exist for the sake of preservation, but i wont be upset if i get to play this game and dont have to pay a dime.

Im not entirely sure itll be ftp though, so this take can be completely void.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 4 hours ago

It was announced to be free to play years ago

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How come I took flack for this same opinion? I'm in the pre alpha and it's coming along nicely. Same feel of skate 3, tight mechanics, I don't see the big deal. It's free. If you don't like it don't play it what's the big deal?

[–] k1ck455kc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

People are upset they arent getting the same type of game the IP is known for. Unfortunately the IP is being used to push a different type of product. I do think people are justified to be upset about that.

As a gamer who wants more to play and wants to pay less, i am ok with this particular IP(which i dont particularly care about) becoming ftp, even if it degrades the overall experience. If this was happening to another IP i enjoy, I might be more upset about this.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If its FTP and all mechanics beyond cosmetics can be accessed with grinding (skate-pun... nice) rather than passes and subscriptions then a great many people need to STFU.

Mechwarrior Online is FTP and Online only, has been since 2013 when it was released, still has players, still gets updates and still makes money without p2w shenanigans. Ive got 3600 hours logged, I still play regularly. Sometimes I buy some shit in game because I'm a grownup with disposable income and 3600 hours worth of entertainment is worth a few bucks.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I kinda agree, but generally find F2P games would have been better as a paid game without the premium shop.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It can be done well either way. If its a premium purchased game eventually it will make more sense financially for them to release a sequel, and the player base will move on. With F2P (If its done well) the games longevity is limited solely by wether or not it keeps making money.

If we're looking at it pessimistically the industry seems to be moving towards buying a premium AAA title, being charged appropriately, being coerced into buying a season pass to play online and then still being harassed with microtransactions.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Runescape back in the day did it pretty well, F2P with a single optional subscription. This model is pretty much dead at this point though.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Turning my business mind towards Skate, they can make money through sources other than the customers.

Clothing companies, in game billboards, in game music deals, skateboard companies... you get the game in front of enough people and the players wont be the whales.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago

So the game is plastered in advertising, that sounds even worse. Seriously I just want to buy a good game. Factorio is a good example of that.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 52 points 23 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This, please. We need more votes? EU only :|

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Stop buying games made by these companies. Petition won't do shit. Take their money away, stop buying them

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Do you even know what the difference between a "European Citizens' Initiative" and petition is?

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

As a non euro and hopefully soon to be better trade partner, no I don't. But I'll go look it up.

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 15 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I wish that has worked over the last decade. It didn't. We need a governing body to stand up and represent us. That's what they're for.

And yes I know it won't be exactly as written. Read the darn thing

[–] tatann@lemm.ee 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That's what EU is for (in Europe), but honestly, even as an avid gamer, there are other priorities, even in the IT/digital department (european alternatives, open source, research, ...), so as of now I keep voting with my wallet

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I'm doing both. Dividing people isn't going help

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world -2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Why would they stop? Cause you asked? Sadly this online crap is what’s making money and game companies are and have always been about money, all of them without exception

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 10 hours ago

Do you know what you're talking about or are you just assuming stuff? Tell me, what is a "European Citizens' Initiative"?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago

It's bad, yes, but historically even online only games have had long lives.

[–] death@infosec.pub 7 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Another game I simply won't need to buy. Neat. I guess some publishers just don't like selling games or something.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Another game I simply won't need to buy

I mean, that would be the case whether it was online-only or not; it's a free-to-play game

They should have an option to pay for a single player, offline experience. I'd buy that if it worked on my Steam Deck.

[–] death@infosec.pub 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, thanks. That was entirely unclear from this article.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 5 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, they mention it obliquely at the end, but it really should be more obviously stated. Presumably they assume anyone reading the article is already familiar with the game

[–] hobbsc@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 19 hours ago

they don't like to sell games, they like to sell in-game "content" now!

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago

It's dead, Jim.