this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
388 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23209 readers
3701 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 65 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

People ought to deny ICE service for a start. Anyone in their vicinity can contribute and nothing is too small.

If they want anything from you, it's your duty to make sure they can't have it.

If they order a sandwich, they should be told the sandwich maker is broken today. Every day. If they need a car repair, that part will take six months to arrive. When they pay for electricity, their payment was misplaced. Their garages should be blocked by parked cars. The garbage truck should accidentally drive past their property again this week. Etc.

Don't be an ICE collaborator.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

Interesting idea but considering that they're not wearing uniforms or badges most of the time how do you know who's ICE?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

"I'm sorry, Mr. ICE person, but I don't agree with your lifestyle choices and cannot serve you."

[–] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The game board has already been flipped over, you cant win now by waving the rule book.

[–] yyyesss@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

so well said, I will be using this. thank you

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 6 hours ago

I had to click the article just to see what that thumbnail is about. A shallow bowl of liquid with a glove floating in it?

It's so much worse than that.

[–] Vince@lemmy.world 81 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

Damn, how do you deport a kid with cancer and not even pause to think of you're doing the right thing

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 37 minutes ago

Well, that kid's mom had tattoos, which makes her part of a criminal gang. If the kid didn't want to be deported, they should have represented themselves in court.

Is a thing that I've legitimately heard reich-wing proto-nazis say.

[–] seemefeelme@infosec.pub 1 points 54 minutes ago

Deporting the kid contributed to a statistic that they are publicly presenting as positive action, which is allowing them to cling to power. That's it. That is the banality of evil.

[–] Wazowski@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

Hey now! There are plenty of nice ghouls. Gob is great! Republicans are feral ghouls.

Edit: on a side note, I used to have a perpetual kitten that chose her name. The name she chose was Mikey Wazowski

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago

They do what the average conservative everywhere does: Convince themselves that most people secretly agree with what they are doing. They truly and honestly believe over two thirds of the country want them to do that.

That's why they keep talking about conspiracies involving someone controlling elections, the government etc. because reality doesn't match up with their views. And they don't think they can be wrong, so they conclude that it has to be some shadow organization that is going against the people.

It's also why they keep talking about themselves as if they are revolutionary fighters going against a great evil.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 63 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I feel like doxing ICE agents will become a thing at some point.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Happened to a few of them a week ago.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Let me know how I can help.

[–] parody@lemmings.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Deleting your account if that wasn’t TORposted

Instead of real activism I might just keep reminding ourselves, everything we do online should be considered posted under our names + emailed to Cashmoney Pawtel, subj line: “domestic terrorist 👇”

Wonder when soft bottomfeeder commenters like me will get Gitmo’d (CECOT’d). First they’re coming for Kilmar & the Palestinian grad student, next…

(I’m really milquetoast I just can’t imagine free speech is going to last very long even for privileged birthright citizens with birthright parents)

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 37 points 10 hours ago

be the change you wish to see in the world.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 34 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

It gets a bit more complicated when that four year old is a member of tren de agagua.

[–] ToastedRavioli@midwest.social 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We are all tren de agagua on this blessed day

[–] PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Thanks, Ken. DOLT

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago

Or La Banda de Plaza Sésamo.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thoughts like that require both a conscience and intelligence and 47 lacks both and more.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 25 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Trump isn't the only one acting. And most of the foot soldiers were already on the job and just daydreaming about when they could really get tough. They need to be doxxed and recorded so they can be punished for their crimes one day. No "amnesty to let the nation heal" or "just doing their job". There needs to be consequences.

[–] osaerisxero@kbin.melroy.org 12 points 9 hours ago

There will need to be another Nuremberg at the current rate of progression

[–] WatDabney@fedia.io 14 points 10 hours ago

It's easy - you just have to be a psychopath.

Like Trump, Musk, Vance, Homan, Noem, Rubio, etc., etc.

[–] Glide@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 hours ago

Obviously because the child with cancer is just a drain on national resources and he's doing the country a favour.

/s for me, but I suspect that this is how he rationalizes it. He does love Hitler, after all.

load more comments
view more: next ›