this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
126 points (96.3% liked)

Asklemmy

47940 readers
1113 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Migmog@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

Could juvenile vampires break into an unowned or abandoned home? What if they were actually hired by the local government to demo an abandoned home? Is that enough consent?

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 52 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

No, they need consent. The state is a third party and cannot consent on your behalf

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago

I wonder if consent ends with the sale of the house? And if so, could you banish an already-invited vampire by selling the house to someone else for like $1 and then immediately buying it back off them?

Also if a vampire owns an apartment building, can they go into tenant's suites without permission? Would buzzing a vampire in at the lobby allow them to go where they want, or only a specific suite?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 27 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Damn, you know your vampire law!

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

spoilerFinally, a good pun. Great work!

Do you believe they’re vampire?

Never met one and I think it would be cool.

[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The warrant gives them the legal right to enter the house, but being vampires, they cannot enter without being invited. However, should you decide not to invite them, you can be found in contempt and arrested, which then creates the problem that the vampire police officer can’t enter to arrest you without being invited…

[–] calabast@lemm.ee 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Could vampires be turned down for the position because they physically are not able to carry out the job? Or would that be supernatural discrimination?

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The Ankh-Morpork League of Temperance* has been petitioning the Patrician for months trying to get a vampire onto the City Watch. The Campaign for Equal Heights and the Fresh Start Club have already gotten dwarves and zombies onto the force, so it’s only a matter of time.

* They’ve sworn off the red sticky stuff, oh deary me, yes.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago

There is a vampire photographer in Ankh-morpork who keep blasting himself to dust every time he make a photo, so the bar is set pretty low i think.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago

In the US at least, employment discrimination is fine if it's due to a bona fide requirement of the job. Ie, the person is fundamentally incapable of performing a job even with reasonable accomodation.

An example of reasonable accomodation is a modified computer/desk setup for someone in a wheel chair. They need a bit more room for maneuvering about their workspace. But someone who is paraplegic is perfectly capable of working most office jobs.

Someone in a wheelchair however is fundamentally incapable of performing certain manual labor jobs, and it is perfectly legal to not hire them for those positions. Quadriplegic people can't work manual construction labor. You're not pouring concrete when you're paralyzed from the neck down, and no reasonable accomodation is going to make that possible.

So for vampires, it really depends on what their work-relevant disabilities are, and how difficult it is to accommodate them. Need to be invited in? A reasonable accomodation for a police department would be to simply not have their vampire officers serve search warrants. They can still respond to emergency calls, as a call for help could give implied permission to enter a home. Vampire officers can still patrol, perform traffic duties, perform detective work, etc. But they simply can't participate in search warrants execution.

The daylight limitations may be more limiting. Sure a vampire could wear a hood and gloves, and that's little different from someone wearing a hijab. But it's still dangerous from a workplace safety concern. All it takes is a perp pulling on your hood, and you start boiling? Huge liability risk for the department. So maybe vampire officers will need to be limited to indoor desk work or the night shift. I think hiring them only for the night shift would be a reasonable accommodation.

Overall, I think vampires could easily be employed as police officers. Some reasonable accommodations are required, but a department outright prohibiting the hiring of vampires likely violates the Americans with Disabilities Act.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you for taking a stand in favor of all the vampires out there who are being unfairly denied careers in law enforcement

[–] Balthazar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Rubbish! No-one is discriminating against vampires.

[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are there any vampire rules against throwing a tear gas grenade through your window?

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

No, but it lacks style, so we prefer not to.

Edit; Apparently Lazlo did it once, but he says it was consentual.

[–] Franklin@lemmy.ca 32 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (5 children)

wait if vampires need to be invited in by the owner, do they have to call your landlord?

[–] Arfman@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

Wait what if it's a state owned public housing place? Is it the government or the people who have to let them in?

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 17 points 15 hours ago

Landlords are kind of vampire too, so you can expect cooperation.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago

Best to live in a housing co-op. That way the building is collectively owned so they would need permission from everyone.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Do they need consent from the owner of the house or home? If it's a rental, the landlord owns the house but it's the tenant's home.

Though it's always kinda messy turning a human-made rule or idea into a physical law.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 26 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

That's actually a plot point in at least one of the vampire shows. A vampire buys someones home from the bank, and they're free to enter despite the resident/occupants refusal.

[–] fixmycode@feddit.cl 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

True Blood, season 2 IIRC?

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

True Blood was great imo (first 3 seasons). Not really into fantasy but this was quite dark at times.

Always remember this savage

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

But even landlords need to at least give notice before they can legally enter.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Not sure vampiric "law" cares about renters rights. And if it does, is it based on current laws in the country they are in, or the country of origin? And is it the origin of vampires themselves or just the vampire turned. And is it based on the time they were turned or modern laws?

Either way, in one instance I they bought it from the bank after missed mortage payments. So they weren't legally living there anyway but counted as last/current resident for the vampire since the bank isn't a person.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

But what if they don't fully own the shell company that owns the houses, do they need a majority stake?

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 18 points 23 hours ago

Depends on which option would serve better to advance the plot

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would guess they would have non vampires to execute the warrant and once they are inside, they could then invite the vampire in.

[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait, can anyone invite them in? Not just the people living there?

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

In all the examples listed in the response, the inviter must explicitly be the owner of the house:

https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/65991/why-do-vampires-have-to-be-invited-in

Although that just leaves us with the question about who is considered the owner. I'm a renter, so would that be me, or my landlord?

Fun fact: In German, this boils down to which translation of "owner" is used. I'm the "Besitzer" of my apartment (I possess it), but not the "Eigentümer" (I cannot sell it).

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I think "occupant" or "resident" are both better choices over "owner" for how this conceptually works.

If a family live in the house, then a child of the family could certainly invite a vampire in, despite the child not being the "owner".

[–] BennyInc@feddit.org 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

What about the child’s friend who is visiting for a sleepover?

[–] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago

No, they must live there.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

I'd argue no, because they are not a resident. They are only a visitor.

Resident (noun) 1. a person who lives somewhere permanently or on a long-term basis

Occupant in a housing sense is pretty synonymous with Resident legally, but in a wider sense can also mean "anyone there at the time" - especially in non-housing contexts (e.g. the occupants of a vehicle). So for the sake of eliminating all ambiguity I'd strike out Occupant, and stick with Resident as the most appropriate term.

[–] guy@piefed.social 5 points 23 hours ago

Seems unlikely, or all vampires are just dumb. Just hypnotise a burglar and have them invite you in

[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

How does the whole vampire thing work anyways? Like if there's a hole in the wall breaking the integrity of the house are they still barred? How much of the house can be removed before it's no longer considered a house? A whole wall? In that case could the police vampire just drill a hole or remove a wall?

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 3 points 21 hours ago

What about people that live outside? Can they draw a line around "their" space and keep vampires out?

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

LOL. That’s good

And no they couldn’t unless they tricked you into saying yes come on.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

No but if you are selling your home they could go for a viewing, kill and eat the realtor, and then drop from your ceiling and devour you when you come home.