this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1290 points (97.8% liked)

News

29373 readers
3709 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] madjo@feddit.nl 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Puritans are still ruling in that stupid country.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

i live in such an atheist bubble. i'm constantly shaking my head at the fact that we haven't woken up to how many problems religion creates. every day that we don't do a massive purge and/or reeducation camp imprisonment of all theists allows this ridiculous charade to keep going.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 5 points 22 hours ago

I watch atheist content creators on youtube do take downs of theistic arguments.

I have been out of religion for so long that I can't fathom those theists not realizing their idiocy.

And those theists always come with such strawmen "You believe we come from a rock" (no, that's not what atheism entails, but you do believe we come from dirt, so that's actually what you believe), "why do you hate god?" (how can I hate something I don't believe exists?) "You should read the bible" (I did, cover to cover, it made me atheist, you should do it too for a change)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Saryn@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brought to you by a president who f****d a pornstar and paid her off by falsifying business records.

Clown world for a clown species.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Brought to you by the only first lady to have pictures in Playboy.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago

I remember when conservatives said they wanted people out of their bedrooms. Well... as a forever alone, what do you think I do in my bedroom every night?

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 56 points 1 day ago
[–] OctaviaMeowzly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 23 hours ago

If this happened in europe, we would all collectively wank off infront of the government buildings or some shit

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never forget your puritan roots

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Witch ones? (sic.)

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 126 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Check this guy's computer first. Guarantee there's some fucked up shit on there. It's always projection.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dzso@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Under the bill, content would be considered obscene if it appeals to prurient interests in nudity

And since they've already taken away due process, they're basically paving the way to send anyone who has a body they don't like to a death camp. I don't think it's hyperbole anymore to say that that US is fucked.

[–] Akuchimoya@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is basically how we ended up with the burqa. A woman's body is evil because it makes men unable to control their sexual urges, therefore women must be banned. Now, in Afghanistan, a woman's voice must not even be heard.

How long until the USA reaches that point?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Sending people to El Salvador is much easier when you make everyone a criminal.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Owning the libs just took on a whole notha meaning, aye? What a treat. /s

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Maybe that's the whole point. That and then letting Hollywood make profit off of sex scenes.

It's all business disguised as well to do ideology.

It is never for the people. If it was for the people we would be building proper community, respect, and teaching the reality of the human experience so that people can be the best they can be.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 158 points 1 day ago
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Conservatives keep saying they're for the common people.

Are they? Are they really? Seems to me they're really busy doing stuff that regular folks hate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 339 points 1 day ago (7 children)

They don't intend to ban anything. They're just creating reasons to lock people up.

They are, to a man, insane authoritarian shitbags. All they care about is control.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 234 points 1 day ago (17 children)

The plan according to project 2025 is to classify trans people existing as pornographic. Wish I was joking. Been warning people about this for a year now.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] 18USCode2381@infosec.pub 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 109 points 1 day ago (9 children)

It's part of the plan in Project 2025, to ban pornography and then classify LGBT literature as pornography

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 233 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Remember that the far right has been desperately trying to label any LGBTQ-related content as 'porn'. Educational resources? 'Porn'. Biographies about gay people? 'Porn'. Drag queens? 'Porn'. A book about a boy with two mommies? 'Porn'. Anything that acknowledges the existence of trans people? 'Porn'.

The purpose of this bill isn't to ban porn, it's to ban 'porn'. Anything they don't like will be deemed 'porn', and then this gives them the legal justification to ban whatever they want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

we know mike johnson couldnt control his porn consumption.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 184 points 1 day ago (19 children)

Friendly reminder that only one party takes rights away.

And that's the party that got all the stupid fucks in our society to think they were the party of freedom.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Even the most oppressive tyrants in history understood the concept of bread and circuses. Most people will stay complacent when their fundamental rights are being taken away as long as they have their distractions. Taking away the distractions is something you only do after you've fully consolidated your power. They're so obsessed with projecting an aura of oppressiveness that they've forgotten how to hold power.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›