this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
98 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

70916 readers
4095 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As a guy closing in on 50, losing my near vision really annoys me. And the current solutions are weak at best, which annoys me even more. These and the other companies working on similar sound great. But someone tell me why I would need a prescription for them? And is that true in the EU? The article makes it sound like getting them approved to be prescribed is a big hurdle. They seem like better reading glasses, which I don't need a prescription to buy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xep@fedia.io 1 points 2 hours ago

These need to be washable, otherwise every time I accidentally wear them into the shower I'm going to have to buy another pair.

[–] coffeetastesbadlikecoffee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

This is INSANE, my entire household could make imense use of theese with our shitty eyesight! I don't cary about any reviews because anything like this will be 1000x better than existing bifocals, I will be preordering 3 pairs of theese as soon as possible. I just hope they don't patent the shit out of them so there will be competitors and the prices won't be astronomical.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I want glasses with the ability to clean themselves.

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 13 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

A manual focus version would be cool too. I don't like the idea of having yet another thing to charge.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Pics for the lazy

[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago

oh damn, I've never seen one in person, but I don't really care about judgment by others, so if I could get some prescription lenses on those, that'd be ideal.

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

eventually they'll come out with a device that charges you while you wear all of your rechargeable items. you just plug yourself into a USB outlet and all your shit gets charged simultaneously

[–] xylol@leminal.space 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

how do we then transfer the charge from the shits to the devices?

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 16 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't think I want it to be possible for someone's glasses to die or freeze

People do dangerous things that are made safer by the fact they can see—like driving

Edit: you'll need a prescription because the amount of focus it needs to do will be different for everyone and there isn't a sensor to determine your eyesight

Well, I have tried multiple sets of reading glasses at different magnification. They all work fine. So I don't think it needs to be that exact to match the person. And I would think some sort of calibration, either by manual means or plugging them into a smartphone and using an app should cover that. I doubt it corrects for things like astigmatism that are more complex.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I’d just keep a spare pair of normal glasses in the car. Anyone that has gotten to the point of needed glasses for both distance and reading likely has old pairs of glasses that can sit in a glove box. Even a slightly outdated prescription works in a pinch.

Bifocals and or swapping between distance and readers is a fucking pain. Something that solves that automatically, without a medical procedure, would be fucking amazing.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I think I'm more concerned about the unfortunate scenarios where:

Glasses fuck up meaning driver can only see near -> something that needs quick reactions happens to avoid someone dying -> driver is fumbling with glasses or trying to find a spare pair -> somebody dies

[–] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

As a driver with short sight and glasses, if my glasses fall off I'm not suddenly blind - I just can't read license places or signs. Traffic lights, other cars etc are still pretty obvious.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

My sister can't see the big E on the old school eye charts.

My kid barely can, as well. They're practically blind without glasses.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

I also am short sighted, though possibly a bit worse than you given your description. If my glasses suddenly fell off there are plenty of hazards I would potentially miss. Idiot kid about to run into the road, etc.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Good point. Maybe these are a “home or office use only” device.

I would looove to have something like this for work or home.

[–] hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl 22 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Interesting idea. I would buy one.

Armed with fresh funding, IXI is now planning to ramp up R&D, expand its team of 50 people, and move into a new headquarters with a purpose-built lab and clean room facilities. The company plans to hold the first live demos of its glasses later this year.

But maybe I shouldn't hold my breath, yet.

[–] qweertz@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago

Looking forward to when these are actually affordable, like in a few decades.

Assuming they haven't gone bankrupt by then ((:

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Sounds great. I’m in my 40s with myopia, astigmatism, and more recently, presbyopia.

Progressive lenses don’t work for me, and needing two pairs of glasses is not ideal, even if it mostly works. Plus I can’t even just buy reading glasses off the shelf, even my short range office lenses need a prescription and are expensive as hell.

Autofocusing lenses sound like an awesome alternative.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

My GUESS would be that you get a prescription for whatever your vision requires as a baseline, then the auto focus kicks in for reading.

The intention is to replace bifocals or progressives, so you'd still have your primary prescription + adjustment for reading.

I hope you are right. But I don’t have a perscription. So I would need clear by default, and only autofocusing for reading. I shouldn't need a script for that.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

That was my take, and I hope we're both right. I'd kill for glasses that auto-focus as readers. I wear contacts most of the time when outside, so maybe not such a savior for me.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks but I dont want specs thatneed charging or can “crash”

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I don't either but I sure would like to be able to read stuff sometimes.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

multifocals areyour friend then

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Is that the same as Progressives? I have them. I hate the areas that don't work on the sides. People get used to them I guess, but I don’t have to wear mine most of the time. And even if you are used to it, that means you have some distorted peripheral vision when you wear them.

They can be depending on your vision issues. Mine are essentially bifocals where the reading portion isn't visible. If I focus there's a tiny fuzzy line where the readers meet the normal lens.

To be honest I wasn't aware of the sides issue and it seems you might have different problem that requires a third lens.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because they are a medical device and there are negative medical repercussions to using glasses that don't conform to your needed prescription.

I can go buy readers when I don't need them. I've been told that using a higher power than you need is bad for you as well. And you can buy glasses online with no script. So I don't think that reason would be valid.

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Interesting concept, here’s hoping. They could definitely take a bite out of the progressive market, especially for people who buy a pair of dedicated reading glasses. Comes down to how much lenses cost, how much/many options the frames come with… I suspect this will be a super niche thing, but on board for it

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

And prescriptions for glasses in general bug me. The only argument for requiring them and having them expire I have heard is that the wrong perscription could be dangerous while driving and such. But heck, we don't make you retake the drivers test every 2 years, and people's driving skills certainly decrease with age. So why prescriptions? Seems like another one of those good for business and not for people laws.

[–] Hoimo@ani.social 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

How do prescriptions for glasses even work on your side of the pond? I assumed it was just jargon of a sort, because round these parts I just go to a glasses seller and ask him for his strongest glasses. Then he says "no traveller, my strongest glasses are too strong for you, you can't handle my strongest glasses" and does the eye test with me before making lenses at the proper strength.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You go to an eye doctor, they do the various tests and create a prescription with the necessary details to get you the right glasses. For the next year, you can use that prescription to buy glasses anywhere you want.

I thought you got at least 2 years...

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

You can just go online and buy them, they don't care about "expired" prescriptions, they only need the numbers.

Sure, but I shouldn't have to. Seems like more of a reason that requiring perscriptions isn't really about anything but money.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

True for glasses, illegal for contacts. It's the dumbest shit ever. I don't need a prescription for band aids, why do I need one for eye correction?

$$$

[–] throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

For contacts I kinda get it.

You could have eye conditions that make you unsuitable to use contacts.

For glasses, its absolute bullshit.

An "incorrect" lens placed on the exterior of your face will not harm you (other than making you a bit dizzy).

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The thing is, if you're eyes are unsuitable for contacts, you'll know really quickly. I would think almost anyone that would buy contacts without an active prescription, has already tried contacts. You still have to know the numbers, so at some point there was an active prescription. I've never been to an eye doctor that didn't give free contacts samples, so there's that option too.

Can't you buy colored contacts with no correction? Seems like if you can do that, the issue with your ryes being unsuitable isn't the reason.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 0 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

My neighbor just bought a pair off of tv, theyre a scam, just +25 reading glasses..

Yeah, my wife got me something that claimed to auto focus. Was just a pair of progressive readers.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

IXI isn’t selling their glasses yet. Your neighbor did not buy what the article is talking about.