this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
1701 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

71396 readers
6386 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 45 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Peak French stupidity, this isn't about protecting kids - it's about building surveillance infrastructure. Back in 2024, critics already called this the foundation for a "Great Firewall of France". Once you have the legal framework to block websites and force ISPs to implement monitoring, mission creep is inevitable.

The technical approach is laughably naive. They're essentially creating a centralized system that could easily become a database of citizen sexual preferences. Even with their "double anonymity," you're still creating digital fingerprints and metadata trails.

Most importantly, it won't work. Kids will just use VPNs - the same way adults are already doing. You're not protecting anyone; you're just pushing everyone toward circumvention tools while normalizing government control over what adults can access online.

It's perfectly French because it combines maximum bureaucratic complexity with zero practical benefit, all while creating new opportunities for state overreach. Classic.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] skinnydugan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 409 points 4 days ago (10 children)

Dr. Cox was right: “I’m fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there’d only be one website left, and it’d be called ‘Bring Back the Porn.'”

[–] WhiteRice@lemmy.ml 125 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Tumblr the Depraved?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 244 points 3 days ago (15 children)

I have to admit, of all the nations on earth, I never expected this sort of puritanical theatrical authoritarianism out of the french.

[–] FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr 96 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They've been trying to block it for many years now.

France has been going downhill for quite some time. Many proposals for chat control and tracking... even recently, we got a law proposal that aimed at banning E2EE 😵

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 51 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Damn, the whole world really is going authoritarian.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NotKyloRen@lemmy.zip 81 points 3 days ago

They should actually take to the streets (again). Not joking. What is this nanny-state BS?

[–] Vermingot@jlai.lu 39 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (22 children)

To clarify, the french didn't ban pornhub, it's the company behind pornhub who decided to deny it's access in France to protest a law proposal that is currently getting examined in parliament

Ps : The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Ps : The law in question would require all porn sites to verify the age of its users

This is how young boys learn to computer. It won't do shit to stop anything. It's a waste of time.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Object@sh.itjust.works 276 points 4 days ago (14 children)

Blocking porn has got to be the most "why even bother" thing

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 176 points 4 days ago (21 children)

Political theater. "Won't somebody think of the children?" is an easy win for politicians.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 109 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Plus an excuse to collect more data.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 45 points 3 days ago

Yeah the point is just to soften the populace to the idea. Our fucking PM covered for pedophile priests in a Catholic school 30 years ago, he doesn't give any fuck about kids.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 84 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not about blocking porn.

It's always about control. Conservatives want to control how you consume sexual content.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 63 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not about that either. It's about connecting photo ID to browsing profiles and deanonymising the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I hate how VPN access is the scaffolding holding the building up making things look normal. You can visit all your normal web sites, you can bypass georestrictions, you can be a little less tracked than you might otherwise be. But what happens when they decide to do away with that scaffolding and we all find out they tore down the house behind it while we were enjoying "normalcy". Too much of making the web functional depends on vpns and adblocking. We shouldn't have to do this stuff and Chromes adblocking scandle should impact millions of users all around the world unilaterally removing adblocking from the web. I fear for the day we have a US only internet and a global internet, not just on paper, but in actual practice.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 35 points 3 days ago (10 children)

At first I suspected this was the French government demanding that 40% of the videos be made in europe using the French language.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Don't people realize there are hundreds of free porn video sites besides Pornhub? With bigger selection too because the lesser known sites usually don't get half their content DMCAed.

Paying money for a VPN just to access ONE free porn site? Sigh. I really hate web 3.0

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 35 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I remember when the French used to respond to this shit with fire instead

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] webmuc@lonestarlemmy.mooo.com 21 points 3 days ago

once again porn leads technology

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 80 points 3 days ago

How about you just parent your children? But it's not about the children, that's just always the convenient excuse

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 103 points 4 days ago (24 children)

I'm shocked that this many people feel the need to disobey a rule that is only there to help the children. Next step must be to ban VPNs altogether, and enforcing all Internet users to be identified with their real identity (/s obviously).

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Finch9678@europe.pub 71 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Out of the loop here, why did Pornhub leave France?

[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 181 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

France passed a law requiring porn sites to verify age of all site visitors. Pornhub is blocking France instead of forcing its visitors to provide ID.

[–] pressedhams@lemmy.blahaj.zone 96 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Age verification requirements.

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 99 points 4 days ago (9 children)

wow, didn't expect that from france. I thought they, of all countries, would be less prudish than Texas about porn. 😬

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 47 points 4 days ago

We have our own homegrown bigots, thank you

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (12 children)

Why do people even go to pornhub... there are so many other options

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Because it's simple and it works. When most people want to watch porn they don't spend an hour researching their best option, they just go somewhere they know and watch something there.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago (24 children)

There are other, much better sites, lol.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 62 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Why do the French even need Pornhub when their basic movies are very porn adjacent?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty satisfied as a subscriber. Slowly using proton mail for more and more important accounts. Constant usage of the VPN. Trying to use the calendar more but still haven't broken my Google Calendar habits. Proton Drive I use over google; I just need a Linux desktop application. Proton pass, still haven't given that a go. Comfortable with KeepassXC and managing the backups myself. Proton Docs, it's OK. Solid start. Hoping that notes partnership/acquisition eventually replaces Google Keep for me as a cloud notes application. I have pretty strong confidence now in the company regardless of the slow Linux developments

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superminerJG@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (8 children)

France underestimated the power of horny

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›