What the ever loving fuck? Why do we need a lawsuit to make someone enforce the existing Wisconsin bribery statute?
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
It isn't bribary. The checks aren't valid, as many have claimed, so they think their vote gets bought but in the end they are just being scammed. That's what happens when you trust Elon. He lies. Even as the richest man in the world he's too cheap to pay out 1000 dollar votes he bought. Also, breaking the law is only being punished when you're poor. Elon broke the law many times by influencing the stock market for his own profits. And of course all the rapes. He hasn't been convicted of anything. Just "warnings".
It isn’t bribary.
Did you read the law I posted and linked? They don't have to follow through. Anyone who even offers money or anything else of value to someone to get them to vote or not vote at all is in violation of this law. Whether they follow through on it or not. Just making the offer is a crime. Elon offered money to people to vote. Period. He broke this statute.
I meant it as a joke. Scamming people is also a crime.
Sorry, misunderstood. 👍
Because this is america.
Lol, votes were sold. How is that democracy anymore?
The candidate he was backing lost.
Trump lost...? Did I jump timelines?
No, you're just remembering the wrong time. This is about the supreme court election in Wisconsin.
Well, you see, money is speech now.
So I guess the question is...would this SCOTUS suppress the free speech of billionaires who want to buy votes directly?
Yep, the Citizens United decision let everyone know that some people just have more free speech than others. This is America.
Wasn't democracy the day the electoral college came into existence
Tribunal of Six:
yOu CAn’T dO ThaT BeCauSe mONeY iS SpeEcH
Side note: fuck the ACLU for using a deeply and fundamentally flawed argument to defend and support the Citizens United ruling. I stopped donating to them when I learned about that years ago.
The lawsuit asks the court to order that Musk never offer similar payments to voters again.
Why stop at a specific number? The troll will just do it again using a different number.
Or just use a cyber truck.
He can't sell em, he'll just give em away for votes
🤣
A better tactic would be to threaten free delivery of a cyberstuck for every person that doesn't vote the way he wants.
It never was a democracy. The fact that the popular vote and the representative vote can produce different results proves this.
No it doesn't, it just proves that you don't know what a representative democracy is. The electrical college is bullshit, but it's still somewhat democratic
The electrical college is bullshit
Shocking!
Take your "somewhat" to someone who cares. The electoral college is a piece of biased shit and it can burn in hell.
The person you're sneering at doesn't care that technically you can slap a word in front of democracy and not be lying. The people don't choose the president, a convoluted system designed to be manipulated over time does.
The point is that direct democracy is just one form of democracy and not having the people directly vote for President doesn't make us undemocratic (so much other shit does that).
Some people have the opinion that if you put in place a system that disempowers voters in some states more than others, this should not be considered a democracy. I agree with that opinion. It can easily be argued, but it sounds like you've made your mind up.
We've failed ourselves by having elected Congresspersons where things like this can even be a concern.