this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
552 points (93.8% liked)

News

30180 readers
4356 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I guruan-fucking-tee there's going to be a new character who's basically just a transgender boogeyman

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 2 points 1 hour ago

No, I bet the trans character will be more of a "look! are you happy now?" like with the game.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Due to how capitalism works, every purchase you make helps fund oppression. That's how the system was designed: to ensure those in power who wish to oppress will ensure wealth is funnelled into their pockets through their convoluted system of ownership.

If it isn't Harry Potter media that tangentially funds Rowling through royalties it is something else that funds another bigoted owner somewhere along the supply chain of the rest of the items you purchase in your life.

You really give a shit about this? Then direct your criticisms at the convoluted system that forces people to give up the things they enjoy because some bigot holds a piece of paper that says they own an idea.

This production has nothing to do with JK except for the fact she has a piece of paper that entitles her to reimbursement. That's the problem, not the people simply trying to make a living or people indulging in media that they enjoy.

[–] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You can't opt out of capitalism. You can opt out of not funding Rowling

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net -2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Congratulations on missing the point

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 31 minutes ago

Then help them understand your point of you feel they missed it.

[–] eskimofry@lemmy.world 0 points 24 minutes ago

if they missed your point you should feel the urge to be more clear. Not act holier than thou

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Sorry but I really don't follow. Are you saying we shouldn't boycot and socially cancel products created by bigots?

There's so much entertainment and its honestly kinda sad that people would sacrifice their moral and justice stance for sake of "comfort consumption". Ew.

[–] spacesatan@leminal.space 1 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Yes that's their point. "no ethical consumption under capitalism" There are no degrees of evil or complicity, shut up and let me continue to not think about what I'm paying for when I buy nestle chocolate. You can't be perfect so trying to cause less harm is just a distraction.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago

Eh disagree with this weakling mindset. It is our duty to be responsible and caring citizens even in systems you disagree with.

[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I'm probably gonna watch it because it's interesting to see what they made of it, I'm gonna pirate it and seed it far and wide tho lol

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 80 points 12 hours ago (12 children)

Whether or not you should consume HP Lovecraft media despite the fact he was a racist is entirely up to you because he is long dead. He doesn't make any money. He isn't even racist any more. Because he's dead.

I always say "If you're going to be a shitshow of a human being but a talented artist, the least you can do is also be dead."

See also: Phil Spector, Pablo Picasso.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 19 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

HP Lovecraft was more a clinical xenophobe and expressed that in his writings. He was afraid of different races, but he was also deadly afraid of scientific advancement and even the color indigo. He also didn't fund terrible politicians or get into feuds on twitter. You also don't see terrible people on twitter using his writings to justify their beliefs.

JK Rowling is actively funding and bragging about making other people's lives worse.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, I actually think Lovecraft was doing what was probably the healthiest thing available to him at the time with all his fucked up phobias by turning them into inspiration for spooky stories. He was creative and articulate enough that he could have been writing political screeds and trying to get others on board with driving out all the immigrants, but instead he wrote about crab monsters from space. Far from the worst possible outcome considering a lot of the other possibilities from the time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

There's also something to say about someone that was a racist in his mind, but made some effort to move in a better direction and/or live in isolation, versus someone that's actively moving toward ruining other people lives with the benefits they reap.

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

There is a novel called "The Art of Monsters" that came out in the wake of Harvey Weinstein (not that he's an artist). It's a good read.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›