this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
649 points (98.4% liked)

News

30616 readers
3897 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hedge-fund billionaire Bill Ackman plans to bankroll a New York City mayoral campaign, arguing that his affluent associates are poised to flood the election with money in an effort to defeat Democratic Socialist frontrunner Zohran Mamdani.

Ackman said he was “gravely concerned” because he believed the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy that would endanger New York’s public services by hollowing out its tax base.

Arguing that his own support of President Trump would automatically disqualify anyone Ackman might put forward, the activist investor said he was making a public appeal: Anyone capable of taking down Mamdani in the Nov. 4 election should step forward and volunteer.

“Importantly, there are hundreds of millions of dollars of capital available to back a competitor to Mamdani that can be put together overnight (believe me, I am in the text strings and the WhatsApp groups) so that a great alternative candidate won’t spend any time,” he wrote.

“So if the right candidate would raise his or her hand tomorrow, the funds will pour in.”

It’s unclear whether New Yorkers would honor such a candidate. The recent intervention by Elon Musk in Wisconsin’s state supreme court election indicated the voting public does not always respond well to billionaires using their money to sway races.

New York mayoral races are notoriously unpredictable due to the city’s chronically low turnout. In 2017, for example, Bill de Blasio won reelection with only 14% of registered voters coming out to support him.

A large influx of New Yorkers heading to the voting booth because they are as concerned as Ackman could easily affect the outcome. If Cuomo can hold on to enough fundraisers, political pundits also point out, it’s possible he could run as an independent like Adams, splitting the left vote and spoiling the race.

Ackman, however, argued all these factors would support the emergence of a centrist candidate looking to position themself on the national stage. It could even be another businessman like Bloomberg, he suggested, although Ackman in an earlier post appeared to indicate he would not seek to run himself.

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

These are the ultra privileged who always get their candidates without any debate whatsoever.

This is the extremely rare exception where they show their faces.

[–] Xande@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone should bankrupt Bill Ackman!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, he's plugged into the unlimited free money system via his friends in private equity.

Much like Sam Altman and Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg and Donald Trump, he will never run out of money to borrow and gamble away again.

[–] Buske@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Ahh yes, the big old group who control the stock market. Lookin at you Kenny boi.

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

at what point is it cheaper to just pay taxes than buying politicians? mindless greed from control freaks.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s such a mild change too. If you make $1.1 million then your NYC taxes go up $2000 under Mamdani’s plan.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Okay, but if you make $1.1B...

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 23 hours ago

Politicians are surprisingly cheap.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

If it was just paying taxes, that would be cheaper--at first, anyway. But the important thing is the power. Laws on everything from taxes to business regulations to social engineering need to be passed and/or stopped from passing, to benefit them and guarantee their lifestyle preferences. And it goes beyond that, because having that kind of power means everyone bows to them, serves them, kisses their asses, and most of all, fears them (or can be crushed by them if they don't do those things).

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

“For the aspiring politician there is no better way to get name recognition, build relationships with long-term donors, and to showcase oneself,” the hedge fund manager wrote, pitching the campaign like a business deal. “The risk/reward of running for mayor over the next 132 days is extremely compelling as the cost in time and energy is small and the upside is enormous.”

Who wants to suck our dicks? Get to the dick sucking now! The chance never has been greater. We need our dicks sucked and will pay handsomely! If we like it, we'll pass you around to suck even more dicks!

[–] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Wow, I wonder if that's the same billionaire Bill Ackerman who's hedge fund owns forty percent of the New York property firm Seaport Entertainment Group?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bill-ackmans-strategic-acquisition-seaport-230404410.html

How many millions do you think a rent freeze would cost him personally?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This won't cause the exodus of the wealthy. It will cause an exodus of the greedy.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Astute distinction.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope the right people start to realise that when the parasite billionaire hedge fund managers are against a dude, then that dude is on the right track.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ackman is throwing all this money out there precisely so that the right people don't realize it

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lots of articles say that Ackman is a real bloodthirty piece of crap, a famously petty crybully, and a supremecist. So I can see why he'd be against Zohran Mamdani.

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/crybullyism-bill-ackman-ruling-class/ https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/bill-ackman-war-harvard-mit-dei-claudine-gay.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzkY3NA_ZkQ

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

His daughter was in the social-studies department just like her father, and rowed crew, too, but she had chosen to write her thesis on “The Concept of Reification in Western Marxist Thought,” having come to very different conclusions than her father had about how the world should work. Ackman said it felt as though she “had been indoctrinated” into a cult.

It's only "indoctrination" when the system of preference isn't capitalism. They'd never admit capitalism breeds its own cult.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah ofc, he's a billionaire.

Nobody who massively exploits people for their own disgusting privilege is ever a good person.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whenever I see anything like this I remember my days working for large American companies and how difficult it was, even as a senior engineer, to get spending approval for anything. Like, even a $20 replacement headset I had to keep resubmitting applications for for three weeks because the managers had a policy of rejecting every first request on the theory that if it was important enough to spend company money on, it was important enough to fill in the form twice.

The point being, these sorts of people do not hand out a single penny without running the numbers and realising that the cost of rigging an election multiplied by the probability of success, is still lower than what they'll financially gain from it going a certain way.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

or what they will financially lose if people start realizing there is a better way to live in a different financial system

[–] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

I'll do it! Pay me, Billiam!

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is just blatant corruption

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (3 children)

System working as designed. You see, Russia and China are the real problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 30 points 1 day ago

I can beat him, money pleaseeeeeee

Mona Lisa from Parks and Recreation asking her father for money.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Always follow the money. Why are GOP and billionaires afraid and against this man who pledges to help the poor and struggling working class? Because they obviously have an interest in keeping the poor and struggling in the status quo conditions in which they live.

If helping the poor didn't hurt their bottom line, they wouldn't pay to keep it from happening.

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

I don't think it's just the money, but that people who have leisure time also have time to think deeply.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago

So the TV pundits are calling this "class warfare", right?

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

These guys were the first against the wall, come the revolution.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Ackman is also a part owner of X, and that platform will also definitely be a big part of an effort to defeat Mamdani.

Edit: a family member just asked me what I think of Mamdani wanting to put a tax on all hiring, saying he proposed a 35% tax on the salary of all new hires. I googled this, and the only results are on X. The fix is in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 67 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the left-wing candidate’s policies would be disastrous, triggering an exodus of the wealthy

Is that a promise? Look dude I'm already sold on him, you don't need to keep selling him

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That is what they always claim, don't they? You can't tax the rich, they'll leave!!

Cool.

Where?

Where will they leave to? Europe? Good luck, taxes are way higher there (not enough , though) either way, you'll be gone from what made you rich in the first place. You're not going anywhere

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They'll go to some red state where fascist stormtroopers keep their boots on the necks of the poor... (ok yeah florida)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I remember the last time it was run. It's why we got president Bloomberg. Oh wait. Why would he actually reference Bloomberg himself whilst suggesting this? Did he just forget exactly how badly this worked?

load more comments (1 replies)

What a crook.

Literally buying elected officials.

A true enemy of the people

[–] Pulsar@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I have no clue what Mamdani ideas for NYC are, but if this pile of crap is against him, that signals to me that Mamdani has principles. Bill Ackerman will only support candidates that he can corrupt.

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Free daycare, free public transit, and city-owned grocery stores. Sounds like a dream to me.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those are the types of things that would encourage people to have kids, then get back into the workforce. Conservatives can't even do what's needed to obtain their goals.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›