this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
735 points (86.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32720 readers
4075 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Grappling7155@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Simon Clark had a pretty good nuanced video on recycling and goes over plastics recycling in the latter parts of the video https://youtu.be/iOtrvBdRx8I

TL;DW Consider the environmental impact of systems over materials, most plastic doesn’t get recycled but some types of plastic are highly recyclable, existing plastic is undervalued, reduce > reuse > recycle.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 45 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

PET bottle recycling is the only part of plastics recycling that actually works. Making sure the bottle caps are also correctly returned to recycling plants is a good goal. Also it makes picking up litter a little easier, because now you only need to pick up one thing instead of two.

Btw, this is why clothing/bags/... made out of recycled plastic bottles is actually a terrible idea, because once the PET is out of the bottle recycling stream it is permanently removed from this recycling loop and new PET needs to be produced to compensate.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We just need thousands more little steps. It all adds up. Like the whole plastic straws debacle. While mocked, it’s one more little step.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, the big problem is that each of these steps takes monumental effort while yielding only very little result.

At the current pace, new areas of plastic waste generation are added much faster than old areas are removed.

While we were busy banning plastic straws and plastic bags and stuck the cap onto the bottle, the plastic garbage production industry added thousands new types of unrecyclable products.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I don’t disagree.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know what % of plastic the cap comprises in a plastic bottle but I bet its double digits. So annoying as it is to use, attaching the cap to the bottle does make sense for recycling. It also lessens litter.

But it needs to be paired up with a deposit refund scheme. Lots of countries do this already and encourages circular economies - the soft drinks companies purchasing recycle material to reuse. I bet those schemes measured a significant jump in recovered plastic when virtually all the caps come back with the bottles.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Annoying? Am I the only one who thinks it's more convenient? The cap cannot fall, you can open it one handed, you cannot lose the cap...

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 hours ago

from what i can tell it's like half a percent of a percent of people who give a singular thought to it beyond "oh they changed it"

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Not only that, but the plastic in the cap is actually made of plastic that is better recyclable than the rest of the bottle.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 9 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Thanks for explaining, I was worried this was a band aid mesure which didn't solve to root cause. /s

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The root problem is that plastic can be recycled but many countries to not motivate their populations to recycle, nor their industries to use reusable containers or to purchase recycled materials and create circular economies. In countries that do have deposit return schemes, reuse & recycling rates are far higher. I see attaching the cap to the bottle as way to squeeze a little more % out of those schemes.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 hours ago

while technically true it's not accurate, the real reason to attach the cap is simply that we don't fucking want bottlecaps strewn about everywhere.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I was interested in that whole ecoli eating plastic and producing 95% acetaminophen from it by mass. Maybe we can stop a lot of the plastic from water/soda bottles and just medicate ourselves till our livers shit themselves out our assholes.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago
[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And they also force people to buy plastic bottles? That is so mean.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 hours ago

In a lot of places, yes. If that's your only way to get water, you will be getting it from a bottle. Water, you know, is important to day-to-day life.

[–] Pringles@sopuli.xyz 245 points 1 day ago (15 children)

That's an EU regulation, not a corporate measure. And it has drastically decreased the amount of littered bottle caps, so a good thing.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

I was interested in that whole ecoli eating plastic and producing 95% acetaminophen from it by mass. Maybe we can stop a lot of the plastic from water/soda bottles and just medicate ourselves till our livers shit themselves out our assholes.

Also it means recycle schemes get a % boost because a lot more bottles come back for recycling with their caps. I wouldn't be surprised if the cap is 10-20% of the total plastic in a bottle so caps were missing then that's wasted opportunity.

I remember as a kid when ring pulls on case used to detach and that's the same thing too. I remember my dad metal detecting on the beach and he'd recover dozens of ringpulls because people just tossed them.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 16 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Littered bottle caps was a problem? Anyway, I hope they do cigarette filters next.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 14 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The caps was a problem yes. Not just littering, but also in sorting for recycling, where they'd often end up in the wrong place.

It obviously depends on where and how it's done, but the thing I've heard is that due to (the lack of) weight and size the bottle caps would end up in the paper badges, which would ruin the paper from being recycled. It's better if it follows the bottle. PET bottles (including caps) are shredded, washed and used for new bottles.

Same thing happened to the pull tabs on aluminium cans. Those used to be separate too.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

I really like the can tabs. The plastic bottle caps annoy me because they make it harder to screw the cap back on. It needs a bit more innovation in my mind.

[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

That’s an EU regulation, not a corporate measure. And it has drastically decreased the amount of littered bottle caps, so a good thing.

you should only be allowed to buy cigarettes if you can account for all your ciggy butts or pick-up an equal amount.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

In Australia they have something called "report a tosser" people who are proven to have littered anything from cigarette buds to plastic bottles and more will be fined to hell and back.

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Imagine the power of combining this tosser initiative with the revenue sharing aspect of New York's vehicle idling program. Save the planet and get paid all at the same time.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Do like Japan with ammunition. You have to turn in your spent cases to buy more.

[–] quoll@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 hours ago

exactly where i got the idea :D

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 139 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I think the cap thing is more about littering because in those countries people litter only the cap for some reason?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 215 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When cleaning up beaches and the like, those caps are the litter they found the most.

People lost them or didn't bother to pick them up because they are so small. Unlike with the bottles themselves.

Since they switched to the new caps, the amount of caps found has decreased significantly.

So yes, they work. It is all based on data.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Ofc it is, but stupid fucks have to complain about mundane shit

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 22 hours ago

Attached cap prevents it from becoming a macroplastic

[–] Zatore@lemmy.zip 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I like the convenience of not losing the cap

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] edwardbear@lemmy.world 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Conspiracy theory of mine - I’m European, so not sure if valid for the other side of the pond, but there was a massive campaign here to recycle the bottle caps by donating them for the creation of incubators for premature births. The local authorities placed massive donation boxes shaped like a heart and they were getting filled constantly.

Here’s the theory: When the campaign started getting up to speed, they started attaching the bottle caps to the bottle, because, I strongly believe, that out there, there is an absolute evil cunt who only feels something when a baby dies, so he wants fewer donated caps, because deep inside he knows people don’t care enough to snap the cap off.

Can incubators not be made out of PET? why not accept and recycle the whole bottle?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›