this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
309 points (97.2% liked)

News

23259 readers
4622 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What could go wrong?

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 100 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

This isn't as ridiculous as the headline makes it out to be. You still need to be licensed, which means a college degree. You can't get through college without reading. They're trying to get more teachers by reducing restrictions, although what they should be doing is making being a teacher a higher paying, less grueling job.

My mother was a Special Education teacher for 40 years and was at the top of her pay scale at 89k. I work in tech and 5 years out of college I was making 4 grand less than her. 5 years later I'm now applying to remote jobs where they're offering $60-75/hour or upwards of $150k/year! I worked for Disney+ and was making $110k/year not including benefits and was literally doing nothing half the time, meanwhile she would literally have to bring work home with her multiple times a week. People I graduated high school with were working in her district and were making like $35-45k/year which is fucking ridiculous.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I guess there are two big questions.

  1. Is FORT a good test to require teachers to take? The test seems rather difficult if it is a problem for college educated adults. What skills are lost by allowing professionals who can't pass the test?

  2. How messed up is the current school funding situation? School-age children as a percentage of the population is dropping, so it isn't like we need more children as a percentage of the population. If school budgets kept up with inflation, we shouldn't need teachers to take a vow of poverty.

[–] eclectic_electron@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

School budgets are paid out of city property taxes, which are mostly paid and voted on by old people who own homes with no mortgage and little chance of increasing their income. They also don't have young kids and are probably Republican.

They'd gouge their own eyes out before they'd vote to raise their own property taxes to pay for something that doesn't benefit them.

Ergo, schools are always underfunded.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Before voting for something that obviously benefits them. An educated populace benefits them, they just don't see it.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The Wisconsin educational system right now:

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Every day think about this movie. How prophetic is was. People are going to look back in 100 years and say, “you guys knew where this was headed”

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

God I fucking wish we were in the Idiocracy timeline. They were all morons but they also immediately put the smartest guy they knew in charge of fixing shit.

[–] mostNONheinous@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

They also expected him to fix everything in a week, and when that didn’t happen they tried to execute him….

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Why the movie not realistic unless you assume rest of the world doesn't exist. Because I can guarantee you that China isn't full of stupid people. If this happens to America China will come over and take us over.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

No, really now?

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You'd enjoy this then: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/51233/51233-h/51233-h.htm

C.M. Kornbluth wrote the original story the movie is loosely based on (more inspired by TBH) in the 1950s. Absolutely worth a read.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I already knew the story without seeing the author or the link. Yep.

[–] jasondj@ttrpg.network 4 points 11 months ago

Well, don't want to sound like a dick or nothin', but, ah... it says on your report card that you're fucked up. Uh, you talk like a fag, and your shit's all retarded.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They reeeeeaally want citizens dumber don't they?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 24 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Dumb people are easier to control and easier to lie to.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

The non-paywalled article: https://archive.ph/1pbRd

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

The bar for teachers is now so that it's below ground level

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At this point they might as well just do the old tradition of having the older kids watch the younger kids.

Teens can be elementary teachers, right?

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Someone please tell me this is hyperbole

[–] Fiorenzo@feddit.it 8 points 11 months ago

As far as I can see is kinda hyperbole. Just did a brief search about "FORT test" and I've found several sites who let you try a similar test to train yourself: it's a little more difficult than "can you read? - answer: YES/NO". Actually I found those tests complex enough, even if english is not my mother language. This said, teachers of course need to be well trained for their job. Only, this FORT doesn't seem a walk in the park to me. Long story short: misleading title.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It's not hyperbole, it's patently false. The FORT test is a 4 hour professional exam for teaching literacy according to current science-based reading and common-core standards.

[–] Arigion@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It sure is . Here have some electrolytes and watch some cartoons. All is good.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I ended up reading the article and coming to the conclusion that FORT may not be a great assessment but I also haven’t looked at the test firsthand so I really can’t say for sure. I’ll go back to watching Ow My Balls now

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago

Cry-perbole