this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
245 points (87.9% liked)

News

36439 readers
3238 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 65 points 2 years ago (70 children)

This is such a bullshit article. Yeah the NRA is a terrible organization and there are a lot of reasons to attack them. But attacking the educational, gun safety and shooting sports programs that they offer or fund is complete bullshit and is detrimental to the public good.

This is like saying we shouldn’t offer driving classes because one day a student might get into an accident.

Correlation is not causation.

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

Out of all the things to criticise the NRA for, this is the last

load more comments (69 replies)
[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Yes, because what America REALLY needs are school shooters with better aim.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's 4-H. That is not exactly a radical organization.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a teacher of children I’m beginning to think maybe it actually would be better if fancy LLMs just took my job.

[–] _danny@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm actually beginning to believe the setting for Ready Player One. In the next ten years it might just be cheaper and safer for children to be given a nice VR headset and attend school fully virtually, hell they might actually get a better education since it'll be easier to mute misbehaving children.

Not exactly going to work for kids under 12 or so, and there's probably lots of eye strain associated with being in a VR headset for hours upon hours, but hey at least the risk of being shot will be lower since there's clearly no way in hell that we will get laws to control weapons.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You assume that the primary purpose of public schools is to educate children. It's not. It's free daycare so both parents can go to work and contribute to gdp while barely treading water even with two incomes.

[–] _danny@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That was the primary reason I mentioned the whole age thing. Teenagers really don't need a babysitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So glad to see the NRA are finally training the kids. It’s always been obvious that the main reason for school shootings is that the children have been failing to protect themselves. After all, more adults with guns has greatly reduced the number of adult shootings, because why wouldn’t it? Good guys with the guns always stop bad guys with guns.

[–] porcariasagrada@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

the next american generation will be trained from kindergarten to live with a war mentality. they'll train in escape tactics, how to be always aware of exits, how to identify the sound of gun fire, and this will be a constant presence in their daily lives.

also those kids will buy guns on mass once they reach adulthood, after all they have been trained from birth that they live in a war against an always present unknown enemy.

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

This isn't something new the NRA has always had a role in training Americans to shoot. This article is just complaining that they let 4-H kids learn firearms safety and shoot a 22lr. Which they've been doing for decades.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

oh no

which mass shooting? did I miss yet another one in the pile of headlines about mass shootings??

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The one in Maine on Oct. 25th.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Another mass shooting! How PERFECT! I can finally pretend to care about the Constitution again! I'm a Pro Life Republican!

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I’m surprised the NRA aren’t giving away a free gun to every family member over the age of 6 months. /s

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Free? They would never do that.

Got to keep those gun manufacturer profits high.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

That worked fine in Serbia ;(

[–] Additional_Prune@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm as anti-NRA as anybody, but 4-H teaching kids to shoot is not a big deal. I taught at a high school in Los Angeles that used to have a shooting range. It also had a marching band. Both are gone. Cutbacks, focus on the required classes, no money for frilly electives.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›