How about no drug adverts? Is that really so hard? I don't know a single person who has ever asked their doctor about something they saw on TV.
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
459 points (99.1% liked)
News
31294 readers
3696 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They're only legal in two countries- the U.S. and New Zealand.
if you didn't say NZ I literally would never have guessed. That's an actual shock.
Yeah, I was amazed when I found out too. Such a weird country to have that be legal.
Canada has drug ads, but with special rules. You can either mention the drug name or its indication, but not both.
So you'll get ads that say stuff like "Ozempic - ask your doctor if it's right for you" with people happily eating in a coffeeshop. But they won't tell you what Ozempic is supposed to do.
Is that the one with the song and dance number? Probs anal seepage.
Akshully according to the article it's only legal in 2 MAJOR countries. I'm curious to know which minor countries it's legal in.
Kiwi's a bit perplexed they were called a major country...
Had a friend with a parent that was a doctor. Apparently she could tell which commercials were getting pushed more based on what patients kept asking for.
Doc, I think I have moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, menopause, and erectile dysfunction.
While I agree in principle, there are people with fibromyalgia who wouldn’t know medications exist for it otherwise, because their doctors barely understand fibromyalgia.
"hmmm have you considered that chronic pain isn't real and you're lying? Don't worry, I'm still going to bill your insurance for the full price of an office visit."
You could always do like I do: not be a woman. No fibromyalgia for me at all. My mother and sister keep ignoring that advice.
But on a more serious note, that really has to suck. Autoimmune diseases are much more likely to affect women and are more likely to be ignored. There was a cool Radiolab episode on them. A hypothesis is that women have an overall more sensitive immune system because their immune system is suppressed during pregnancy so having a more sensitive one means you are less likely to get sick during pregnancy. Use of hormones like estriol seem to be helpful. But if you suffer from fibromyalgia, you probably know a good amount/all of that info and more.
That is exactly it. One of my family members suffered from it for years before finding out about it online, and eventually had to switch to a new doctor that didn’t try to convince them it was all in their head. It’s hard to accept that the weight of a thin bed sheet on your legs being painful is just in your head, yet that’s the line they were given repeatedly.
This is true for a lot of other cases too. People live with chronic conditions because they either don't know that it's an issue and there's treatment, or they sought treatment and there wasn't any help at the time, and since then there have been new drugs release
There’s so much new stuff coming out that most doctors don’t know anything about it until someone mentions it or they go look it up on the internet. Some will only refer to their huge out-of-date drug encyclopedia and if it’s not there you’re SOL.
I know a few people with fibromyalgia who didn’t know that’s what they had until they saw a commercial for it. Doctors never mentioned it as a possible diagnosis.
I was so happy when I heard my doctor schooling a few pharma reps on how the drug they were pushing actually works.
Unclear… do you mean for the better or worse? Could go either way.
I'm not sure I understand your confusion.
how the drug they were pushing actually works
Does that mean he/she was explaining the mechanism by which it works and it was good? Or was she/he explaining negative side effects they failed to mention or didn’t understand? Something else?
Ah, she was just correcting them on the mechanism of action, so I don't think it was a good or bad thing. I was paying and leaving, so I couldn't stay for the whole convo.
Thank you for coming back to this! Yes, that sounds like a great doctor, good to hear she wasn’t having to school them on how it was causing harm or something like that.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Actually about 50% of the time your doctor will give it to you just by you asking. That's why they do this. You're not a person that advertising works on, but remember that the country is filled with monkeys.
Maybe not medications, but people generally write off benign symptoms quickly, and a series of benign symptoms can often be an indication of something more serious.
Then that person sees a commercial and it lists all the symptoms they've been having at once and it makes them go "Hey wait a minute, all those symptoms sound familiar, maybe I should make an appointment"
Iirc there was a study a few years ago that determined that medication commercials can increase the rate people see doctors.
Then you have to spend years trying to convince your doctor that it's not because you're overweight or just imagining it.
Well yea, but that's a whole separate issue
Awareness is probably what they're after, and it's probably worth billions to the pharmaceutical industry and the congressmen they own.
All of the medications that are little more than QoL things. Frequent urinarion. ED. Dry mouth.
Things you wouldn’t normally ask a doctor about being a condition.
I actually did with Ubrelvy for migraines, but it was something my doctor was about to give me samples of anyway.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why is direct marketing of drugs even allowed at all? Because our regulators are captured by corporate money.
How about ads that actually tell you what the hell it does? "Ask your doctor if perflorfinmaxim is right for you". FOR WHAT?
Me: Hey doc, is perflorfinmaxim right for me?
Doc: That's for people who leak pus out of their left pupil, so no
Why do I have a feeling that "conspicuous and neutral" was added there only because pharma companies would otherwise misinterpret "clear" as "see-through"?
Are they keeping the loophole where you only have to discuss side effects if you also discuss the intended use?
I've seen an obnoxious trend in pharma ads where you get 25 seconds or so to guess what ailment the actors are concerned about from their demographics and general demeanor, followed by an instruction to "ask your physician if [brand name] is right for you too."
Do other countries advertise Rx on TV? Cuz I ain't ever seen it outside the US
From the article, only the US and New Zealand allow Rz drug advertisements.
derp, it was right there on the bottom, thanks
Most countries prohibit it.
In Canada, for example, there are strict limits on what can be said in advertising.
Well, it only took them 40-odd years to deal with a hugely exploited loophole. Thanks for keeping us safe, FDA.
One of my big take aways from a recent trip the US was the drug adverts on TV. Crazy seeing side effects being read out as like "may cause death, will result in an increase of stroke risk, 90% of patients report anal leakage while using Randomdrugoxicam, erectile dysfunction may continue for up to 48 years after treatment has ceased" or whatever and the footage is these happy laughing people in parks throwing their kid up in the air, walking their dog, hugging family etc. Totally dystopian.
They do that to distract you from the side effects. If you see people smiling and laughing you won't think it's bad.
Will it be more or less clear if I'm at risk of taint rash?
view more: next ›