this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
379 points (99.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

35085 readers
4680 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NichEherVielleicht@feddit.org 99 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am pretty sure Hard Drive dot net is a satirical tech blog.

[–] Joeffect@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Okay, hear me out... I have no place for this anymore because conspiracy theories are overrun by super crazy people... but that's not my point right now...

So, my conspiracy theory is that some government entity established satirical websites as a means to spread misinformation or to desensitize the population..

It's really strange that like pre 2008 (i dont have excat dates here), there were basically none of these kinds of sites, and then they started popping up everywhere...

It's one of those things that I believe got us to this point...

But I'm probably crazy and wrong who knows

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I can assure you with absolute certainty that satire has been an established tradition for a very long time before 2008

[–] krunklom@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

Lies. Voltaire was a deep state psy op

[–] oneser@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

But you provide no references, which mean none exist! My god, maybe this commenter is on to something and satire was invented in 2008 to turn us into sheeple!

(I love a good/shit conspiracy theory and stand equally behind op and this comment)

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Onion started publishing in 1988, and was online by 1996.

Landover Baptist has been on the net since 1998. I stumbled on it as kid, back when the family computer was for playing Neopets.

There’s been an increase in satire websites for sure, largely driven by the popularity of the Onion, and it does cause problems. There are conservative outlets which 100% put out complete and utter bullshit under the guise of “satire,” knowing that their audience has the gullibility of a five year old, and that’ll end up on garbage Facebook pages as unironic.

It’s not “conspiracy” but more - the Onion is very popular, popular things get knock offs, and opportunists saw a way to inject lies or laziness into the public discourse, while claiming they’re “satire.” (Similar to how CinemaSins on YouTube uses the term, “we were wrong about a basic thing in the movie? psych! the jokes on you for taking it seriously!)

I really miss that brief time that the Babylon Bee was good.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Speaking as someone who got literally any humanities education:

The whole 'predictive programming' thing only works on absolute inhumanly stupid dumbfucks who unironically join the 'homelander' fan club. People need to be made that stupid, and doing it while teaching them how to read and fo arithmetic was a hell of an achievement.

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"the government spreads conspiracy theories" has been a (proven) theory since conspiracy theories existed

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

• Carrots are good for your eyesight

• the [common enemy] did it

• Fats are bad for you

This aes but three of many.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 month ago (1 children)

(it's satire, for those unaware, but damn funny)

[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago

The problem is that it's believable at this point

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago

“Dylan wasn’t even born yet when the original announcement trailer released,” Carter said, shedding a single tear, “now that he’s seven, I get to share the experience of watching that announcement for the first time. I can’t wait to see his jaw drop as he realizes what he’s seeing."

Article is some top tier parody lol

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have zero interest in them remastering the older games. I 100% do not want an unreal engine Morrowind remaster. I want Morrowind to be a buggy exploitable mess where I can buff my intelligence and speed into 5 digit numbers.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

to be fair what has happened to oblivion is that the game still runs entirely on the old creation engine, but the renderer and all the graphics assets have been swapped for unreal engine. you get old bugs as well as new bugs.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't mind the remasters, because I'm too young to have actually played any of the remastered games when they were released. So, I played Oblivion Remastered, and that's the only way I would've ever know about it. I thought that Skyrim was just a legendary standalone game that people loved (I've still never played it). I can see it as a waste of time for the studio and a ridiculous cashgrab as well, especially for the people that played the originals.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't mind remasters if they are that - remasters. Faithful graphical updates to the originals (e.g. Halo 2 Anniversary). But a lot of the time they are janky remakes instead by outsourced development for as cheap as possible. They usually end up as insults to the originals.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The problem I have with remasters is how they fundamentally change the art direction so often.

They’re good supplements to their original, but I don’t think they’re fit replacements.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed.

Probs because they are usually outsourced for cheap with little direction from the main studio, "as long as its good enough". And/or the main studio has completely changed since the original and they just dont have the same respect for it.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

It’s weird when applied to other mediums, nobody is out there repainting the Mona Lisa in a modern art style then marketing it as the “new” Mona Lisa and going as far as to replace the original with it.

The closest parallel I can think of would be remake/remasters in film but even then you’d be hard pressed to not start an argument with Star Wars nerds over mention of the remasters.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Halo 2 anniversary was good but I'm one of those people that would have preferred halo 1 campaign remade in the halo 2 engine instead of having a visual overlay with the collisions from the original models

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If that's your fancy then sure, but I much prefer a remaster, especially when you can swap on the fly between old and new, I feel like that should be a requirement for them. You can't really do that with a remake, as the physics etc will be different.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

Counterpoint, the System Shock 1 remake was an absolute banger and probably would not have been possible in the modern ecosystem as a faithful remaster. It absolutely needed to be cooked again from the ground up, and Night Dive did this very skillfully and turned a game that, while good, was notoriously difficult to parse and control, into a modern immersive sim RPG shooter that anyone can understand.

Remakes can be good when the team behind them understands the product that they are remaking and the audience that will be playing it.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the only reason to switch for me was if it was a better visual reference for alignment of glitch maneuvers or if the collisions were off by too much. For me nostalgia filter makes the original look better in my memories than when I actually go look at it again, and if the game is 100% identical under the hood I will exploit every bug and glitch out of habit even if I don't want to.

I suppose with a game that old there is a good chance of something similar to what happened to majora's mask 3ds happening (character movement worse, boss mechanics dumbed down to the point of being insulting but also not even working well) if they were to change much more.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago

It's just nice to see what's changed in X amount of years. People who wouldn't have bought the original will buy the remaster, then be able to see the old graphics, maybe even prefer it. To get a firsthand look at the original is a nice touch, understanding how they built the world with the limitations they had and to see how far we have come. But each to their own.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The original Oblivion was the first AAA game I played!

IMO giving good games a second wave of hype like that isn't a bad thing, as long as it's not totally butchered.

...But Skyrim (specifically the latest re-release) has aged better than Oblivion, I'd say. It's kinda past a threshold where the visuals are okay enough, and gameplay ergonomic enough, where even the original isn't so jarring compared to, say, KCD II and all its hyper fanciness. Like, Daggerfall -> Morrowind was a different world, Morrowind -> Oblivion was like you're in reality, Oblivion -> Skyrim was dramatic, but... stuff after that feels more like icing?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

skyrim just needs a round of polish; bump up texture quality and polygon counts, and go over the actual content and make that less absurd and disconnected from the world.
Like go through every part of the game while having witcher 3 on another monitor, so the lackluster parts of skyrim inflict physical pain.

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People who buy this crap are out of control. Vote with your wallet.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I was in highschool when skyrim came out, that one cracked install we had was shared like a used needle

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Really though, surely this game couldn't be too far off by now

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Bethesda made it sound like all studio resources prioritized starfield first, they've only been working on ES6 for a year or two. Just 10 more years to go!

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The thing is with how tes5 went they kiiiiind of need to have nazi elves as the bad guys they were setting up, and they kiiiiind of need to be extremely the bad guys, and thats gonna be rough in the current political climate-they're literally in the same city as a naval academy and nsa hq; it would be super awkward.

I mean, they should, but they're kind of owned by MS so...

Edit: or we coukd just say that making an mmo is the end of any series.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

adding a more proper single player experience to ESO and rebranding it to TES6 would be a fucking universe brain move

Nah. There's never more single player content after the mmo.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

The trailer could use a remaster though

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago

I wonder if someone has/will make a fell for Todd's lies again award meme with the bewildered guy wearing an Iron_Helmet_(Skyrim). Probably needs some real headlines/reviews (well, aside from Starfield).