this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2025
136 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

75670 readers
4097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The age of information is in the past.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I read an article that suggests classified ads used to support newspapers and hard journalism, and the Internet and sites like Craigslist took away that revenue to pay reporters.

[–] ominouslemon@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

Yep that's pretty much how it went. Also print ads have lost against digital ads, which pay way less money to publishers and keep paying less each year

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't know though papers like the daily mail will rags even back in the 90s. Those people will never journalists.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For real. People.com has "news" eh? Sure.

[–] noobface@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Those not seeking the truth will never notice when it's gone.

[–] Microw@piefed.zip 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I was confused there for a second but apparently the BBC has introduced a paywall only for US users. Site is still completely free to read anywhere else, which is why I didnt even realize that there is a paywall.

Which of course means that US Americans could simply VPN their way around it..

[–] LemmyThinkAboutThat@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This screenshot is from July 2025 when I got hit with a paywall and was served with a ton of cookies, so I set my VPN to UK, lol.

EDIT: This was around the same time as POTUS hit UK with tariffs.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 month ago

The BBC has been run as a business now and it's absolutely stupid. It was never meant to make a profit that was never really the point. It was supposed to be a public service and a projection of soft power, that seems to have gone out to the window now.

I suspect a lot of the work at the BBC don't actually agree with this, but management don't listen to anyone.

[–] Zonetrooper@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This is a little surprising to me because I read it on a daily basis and haven't seen sign of the paywall yet. I don't know if Ublock Origin is simply squashing that as well, or I'm somehow lucky.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

No paywall for me in America. I read the BBC all the time.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

New York Crimes number one!

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll say it again. Stop tracking me and I'll look at your ads. I look at physical mailers, like I literally look through them, more than I look at Internet ads.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago
  1. No tracking. Context based ads instead of user profiles.
  2. You are responsible for the content on your pages. If you farm out to an ad network and expose users to malicious scripts, that’s on you.
  3. No pop-ups/overs, animated anything. If it’s taking over control of my screen, I’m not going to tolerate it.
[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

I forgot about the paywall and assumed this was due to their international reputational damage, over things like their pro-Israel “reporting” of the occupations in Palestine.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dropped BBC. Switched to DW and haven't looked back

[–] Pro@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why not Australia ABC news or Canada CBC News?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

The problem with ABC news in my experience is they assume their audience are familiar with the geopolitical situation in Asia and of course most westerners aren't.

Like the whole toilet paper thing during the pandemic. The way they reported it made it sound like it was a global issue rather than an Australia issue. The situation that arose to create that problem simply doesn't exist in other parts of the world, but because of the way they reported it, they made people think that it was an international problem. Then it actually became an international problem. Now granted, a certain amount of brainlessness has to be considered on the behalf of the people reading this stuff but still, it demonstrates the issue.

[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The report doesn't clearly establish a link between paywalls and a drop in site visits (which I would have liked to see).

One of the un-paywalled sites lost traffic mostly due to changes in the Google algorithm.

Overall, it just seems like a regular update of the website traffic rankings, juiced up by a clickbait headline.

[–] datavoid@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How is msn even on this list? Their articles have been almost entirely clickbait trash since the mid 2000s.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

They repost news from other sites, much like yahoo. They’re really just a news aggregator/feed — no original reporting.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I don't even visit news sites, just about every major site has an rss. I simpy load my reader, refresh it and read the news without any annoyances.

[–] crocswithsocks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I dropped NYT a while back and switched to APNews. Ive been pretty happy with them. I see that they are dropping readership too. Any reason why?

[–] slowbyrne@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

I'm guessing the use of AI is partially contributing to this drop.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Take your money from the ISP's, not the people that use them. Fuck firewalls.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Pfft, fuck America, they deserve it while they allow a criminal to ruin the country and the world.

100% fuck America.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

I got to nyt every day don't read articles and only play their games and leave all on a vpn

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

maga becomes increasingly racist and bbc instantly drops down the rankings. coincidence?

[–] Pro@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Bro, what are you talking about?