this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
120 points (93.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

37621 readers
1882 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

odds of it happening eventually, go up the longer you live.

Despite this DNA replication being highly controlled and very accurate, the sheer number of times it is performed in the lifespan of a person (estimated to be 10,000 trillion times!) means the introduction of a significant number of errors into the DNA of some of our cells from this fundamental process is inevitable. source

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 74 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Other way round: they are immortal because they don't have transcription and replication errors.

[–] BremboTheFourth@piefed.ca 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, isn't aging straight up caused by degradation during replication, like oxidation or something? I feel like being immortal would necessarily imply we fixed that shit

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yes. Your telomeres start to fray at the ends as you get older due to imperfect cell replications.

If we could solve that we'd be effectively immortal from death due to age related issues.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Arteries clogging up suggests that your time would still be limited for many

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There are ways to prevent heart related diseases caused by comorbidities. A healthy diet would still be required. Obesity increases your morbidity rate regardless of whether or not you're getting gray hair because your telomeres are fraying.

But, correct, if you had a genetic predisposition to a comorbidity, then you may not make it to 199, or whatever age people start dying at when some bad genetics finally catches up to them in the form of cancer (usually).

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Just scrub them out with a pipe cleaner from time to time you'll be fine

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago

Telomere also don't matter when replication enzymes add a random adenosine into a gene that controls genetic proofreading.

what even is aging? How do you measure it? Is it really just changes to your DNA? Is that really all of it? I don't think so.

I think the DNA largely doesn't mutate through your life. This is evident when you consider that probably a billion generations have passed since the beginning of life, with even more cell divisions, and you're probably not a cripple because of it, so replication is not inherently doomed to lead to degradation over time.

Instead, it's probably a mixture of factors. Some cells degrade because of DNA replication errors, some telomeres shorten, but also some kind of chemical clock ticks in our body and that in turn acts as a hormone on cells, making them act like they do in older individuals, on top of that old dysfunctional cells die but aren't properly eaten up and removed, so they linger around and kinda take up space, then there's misfolded proteins accumulating and clogging up the system, but it's a lot of factors, not just a single one.

I guess tackling aging means tackling all of these things, one after another.

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Another point of view would be error replication leading to mutation since they cannot die. So a million years in the future how much different would they be from their original species.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe, but immortality also tends to come with things like extraordinary capabilities for self repair and by extension disease resistance, so maybe they get some sort of error correcting code in their DNA replication to go with it.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Human (ECC, lifetime warranty)

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Hurray I get that reference

[–] cymor@midwest.social 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Iirc elephants too. Megafauna is either very good fighting cancers, living with them (no metastization) or completely immune to it. That's called Peto's paradox, though recently, there was a study that claimed cancer rates are higher than we thought: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2025/feb/bigger-animals-get-more-cancer-defying-decades-old-belief

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I wonder if it just takes longer to become a problem? I would expect (and someone correct me if I'm wrong) that a tumor likely grows at roughly the same rate regardless of body size. A 3cm diameter tumor likely just isn't as big of a deal when you mass 100,000kg.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] VivianRixia@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

aren't bats like immune to a ton of diseases. which is what makes them dangerous as they are carriers.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Imagine this: you’re immortal, not just in the sense of “not aging,” but in the sense that you cannot die. No matter what happens, disease, trauma, fire, bullets, you persist.

Now introduce cancer into the equation. You don’t get a merciful end. You don’t get release. The cells in your body still mutate, still misfire, still turn against you. Tumors grow. They spread. They choke your organs, twist your bones, invade your brain.

In a mortal body, this means death, an end to the suffering. In your body? It means endless malfunction. Organs clogged with growths but never failing enough to kill you. Skin splitting under lesions that never close. Your lungs filled with tumors, every breath a shallow gasp, but the suffocation never comes. Your brain riddled with metastases until you’re half-aware, locked inside a prison of decaying flesh that never stops decaying.

And it doesn’t stop there. Given infinite time, you don’t get one cancer. You get all of them. Over centuries, every tissue eventually betrays you. Your body becomes a battlefield of competing malignancies, tumors devouring tumors, a grotesque ecosystem of your own flesh.

You live forever, yes. But you might pray for death long before eternity runs out.

[–] fixmycode@feddit.cl 5 points 1 month ago

this solution for immortality breaks thermodynamics. given that state, the body can no longer process nutrients to maintain self replication, you can starve cancer cells. either you're saved by malnourishment or you die from it.

[–] phonics@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

this is why im on lemmy. 👏👏👏

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

You'd live so long, your cancer would get cancer.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Supernatural had a guy who was immortal but kept aging/developing disease. He tried to take Sam's eyes to replace his own

[–] KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

AKA the Ted Faro Scenario

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Or you turn into cancerman from that X-files episode

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

Wrong way around.

They're immortals because they've left their cancer riddled bodies behind to become made of living metal.

Or I've been reading too much 40K.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I dunno, I guess we'd have to ask that crayfish that cloned itself a few million times and will likely never die.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

All immortals eventually become Deadpool.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe immortals are just lobsters without a shell ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I highly doubt immortals maintain the same body parts due to this. Kinda like a car. Parts have to eventually be replaced.