this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
1014 points (98.7% liked)

News

32530 readers
2863 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As soon as I need to subscribe to multiple services to find my music I'm going back to piracy. Fuck that anti consumer shit.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 32 points 6 days ago (7 children)

You should already be going back to piracy. Spotify is scamming you and artists.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

fun fact:

Jellyfin works for music (and audio books) just as well as it does for movies and TV shows!

And being open source, there are apps specific to certain use cases. Like on ios there's Finamp for music and Plappa for audio books.

It also streams in FLAC quality!

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Plex also has Plexamp which works great for music, if you’re like me and got the lifetime Plex pass long ago.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

Lifetime Plex Pass here too. I got it long ago.

I still migrated my server and uninstalled it once I tried Jellyfin for a few days because of the performance difference alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is there a FOSS music discovery service? I like to listen to 1920' to 1960', and the radios and discovery in those era on Spotify work extremely well.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

I'm not sure. In my case with Jellyfin it's fully self-hosted and not connected to any kind of discovery service.

I appreciate the value of automated music discovery services. I listened to so much last.fm in the early days of it. But like I have posted about before, I have been trying the old fashioned way lately and liking it a lot. I search for the best bands, best songs, best albums of a certain genre or period. It gives me some listicles on music websites and some discussions between what seem like real people, etc.

So then I just start downloading entire albums or discographies, and then work those in to listen at work. Maybe listen to albums as albums, or shuffle play all songs from the artist, or make a playlist, or just shuffle play my entire library.

When a song really jumps out at me, I'll generally add it to my ever-growing playlist.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The piracy service still sucks compared to Spotify.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Because piracy is way better for artists

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I would guess it has a healthier impact on artists as a group than Spotify does, yeah.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 48 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Boy, this band's name sure made this headline confusing.

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I didn't realize this was band related until your post

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm only vaguely aware of them because one of their songs was used as the House theme, and I still thought the article was describing an upcoming cyber attack on Spotify.

[–] Nosavingthrow@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

I wish more bands I like were on bandcamp

[–] ScrumpyDumpleskin@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Tidal HiFi is really good, better sound quality, has most music.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They also pay the artists better.

Its also cheaper, somehow.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 days ago

TBH if you're an artist you'll probably make more money by NOT being on streaming platforms and having people buy your music directly - spotify in particular pays fuck all, you might as well have your music on The Pirate Bay. Hell, putting your own music on pirating platforms is probably better for discovery, and people who like your music will buy the albums.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)

evicting JOE rogan would be goodstart from spotify

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Simple maths. How many customers does it cost us to platform assholes, conspiracy nuts and nazis, and how many customers does it get us?

Adding to that how much they pay the idiot, I feel the balance is tipping towards firing him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 21 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I had friends try to get me into Spotify, never liked it.

I use antennaPod for podcasts, highly recommend

[–] mondomon@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Fellow AntennaPod user. All my podcasts I listened to elsewhere, no adds, no political bullshit, all good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 26 points 6 days ago

Spotify must die

[–] BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Have you guys read the article ? Spotify is denying the claim of massive attack and other platforms as misinformation, they are claiming that the firm the CEO invested in is only working towards military defense of Ukraine against Russia's invasion. I don't know what is true and don't have the time to check, but it looks to me like a decent response if true.

Not saying Spotify isn't problematic, but that might be overblown misinformation.

Then again, if you want to cancel Spotify, good, I'm all for it, I don't like the enshitification they are undergoing. But this reason might not be the one you should put on the resignation form, it might not send the right message to Spotify.

[–] Mobile@leminal.space 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The company, Helsing, pledges to only sell towards democratic governments. I think it's a very slippery slope. In my opinion, once you've taken a step towards the military industrial complex, you are the military industrial complex.

I'm not sure how much funding came from the profits of Spotify. It could have come from other investments. Ultimately, you have Spotify leadership involved in a defence company that makes drones. Ethically, I don't like my money going towards someone who invests in this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Spotify has been shitty from inception IMO. I've tried it a couple times at different points and first off, just didn't like the UX at all.

The "free" tier is unusable if you're an active listener and not the type to just have something, anything, playing as background noise.

My biggest pet peeve with Spotify and most of the other big modern streamers: There's a tenuous connection between the listed artist and a "real" artist, so there's no way to tell if you're listening to something intentionally created that can be found elsewhere, or just procedurally generated slop uploaded by some rando. Google is just as bad if not worse with this since merging Google Play Music with YouTube. Apple seems to get this part right, but I have no other reason to switch.

Anyway, that's not even touching any political/ethics/business aspects of Spotify. It's hard to imagine it becoming any shittier, and I've always wondered how they have the market share they do. At some point I realized that it's kind of just the default option for the more casual listener who isn't already slotted into Apple or Google for everything. Plus it has official, polished integrations with a lot of other apps/ecosystems (e.g. Discord, Xbox).

I'd sooner bring lossless versions of all my stuff local and tag every track by hand than give them any amount of money, but it's clearly not made for me so that doesn't mean much.

I've been driven more to web radio stations, even terrestrial radio (streamed or actual FM). there are some great free/non-commercial choices out there still with human DJs. (Shout-out to kexp). Human-curated radio is still viable for discovery and going out of your comfort zone musically, and human "taste-makers" still have a place, which is reassuring. There are a few newish low power FM stations around me which are actually good, which is an interesting and unexpected development.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago

Because fuck'em, that's why!

[–] vodkasolution@feddit.it 15 points 6 days ago

I appreciate the move, bold for them and the fanbase.
Nowadays probably Dua Lipa, Bruno Mars, Drake and Taylor Swift together could make an impact if they decide to leave (spoiler: no way)

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Good. Streaming is for cowards

[–] bomberesque@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

This news finally made me get off my fat lazy arse and do what I've been telling myself to do for far too long...

Hello Qobuz

[–] nev@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I love it. The streaming services deserve to die, for their shady practices towards artists...

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Because the record labels were so much better...

We are in need of a good alternative, where the money we give the service goes to the artists based on how much we've listened to that artist personally, not on some amalgamated metrics. I want to be able to open my account and see I've given £2 this month for bandwidth and management costs, £1.20 to Taylor Swift, £1.50 to Massive Attack, £1 to Portishead, etc.

If at any point you can make money by buying accounts and playing your own tracks over and over, then the service has fucked up.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Flimbo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›