this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
278 points (95.4% liked)

You Should Know

41340 readers
319 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true: Disiniformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.

If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Likes from logged in views do count, the like to view ratio is higher due to that.

A German YouTuber tested it with an unlisted video, I can’t find it as of now but I do find a lot of deleted videos in my liked ones…

Basic theory as of the time of the video is that they want to go against bot views. Short views did not decline, only long form video, and of those the people with mostly desktop views are hit the most.

Edit: found it!

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m8DZft_zLH4&t=1s

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 133 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The adblocking will continue until transparency of content delivery improves.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 56 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ads are pretty evil anyway.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Banksy’s Letter on Advertising presents it in better words than I ever could.

[–] jared@mander.xyz 73 points 5 days ago (1 children)

People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you're not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you. You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity. Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It's yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head. You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don't owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don't even start asking for theirs.

Banksy

[–] Binturong@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 days ago

Goddamn, this is unfathomably based, thank you for sharing.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago

The adblocking will continue ~~until transparency of content delivery improves~~.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

MFs in my IT group at work took away our adblockers. Now I can't look at ANYTHING off the corporate teet without my machine dying due to the sheer volume of ads on the average website

I believe that was their intention, then.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 48 points 5 days ago

So they go and blame ad blockers for the decrease at the same time they cause said "decline"? Classic.

[–] Tautvydaxx@sopuli.xyz 24 points 5 days ago

Get ready for “login, like and subscribe guys” and dont forget to smash that login button

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So do advertisers still have to pay for impressions or clicks if the viewer isn't logged in?

Something tells me Google's just going to pocket the difference now.

[–] Sumdood64209@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

From different youtubers self reporting they say the amount of money they make hasn't changed, so it appears they still play the ads but not count their views on YT

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 29 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So far I've seen RedLetterMedia blame Restricted mode. Then saw SpiffingBrit refute that. Some comments I saw blamed ad blockers.

Then I checked out, not my problem. It's a black box everyone is trying to solve.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Restricted mode is only turned on if that account does only watch restricted videos.

[–] JelleWho@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Wasn't it already proven to be an ad-blocker update? I though thet blocked the url that counts the views. So no views are counted

[–] kbal@fedia.io 31 points 5 days ago

I did some youtubing last week and saw three people claiming that three different theories were already proven.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I find it crazy that the client would call an API endpoint to register a view. Then we could just call that end point in a script to arbitrarily inflate the view count, can we not? How do they prevent this exploit? Wouldn't it be better if the server registered the view after a certain amount of the video was delivered?

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why is that crazy?

You don't want to register a view just because the backend sent a 200 response for the video.

You want to register a view when the video has loaded, it has begun to play, and quite likely after some arbitrary percentage of the video.

This is all front end information. How much of the video was made available to the front end to play isn't really relevant.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Alright, not "crazy", but this doesn't explain how they combat exploiting this by just calling the end point.

[–] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

That's more or less how it works, but that's still an additional call. If Google is not tying it directly into segment download requests, then it could potentially be blocked without disrupting playback.

I have no insight into the details of the inner workings. If I download a video with yt-dlp, does it increase the view count? If not, then it's a broken system, yeah?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

If I download a video with yt-dlp, does it increase the view count? If not, then it's a broken system, yeah?

I'm very curious to know how they register a view, yeah. The only true measurement is the video reaching someone's retina or ears, to measure attention, which is impossible at a large scale as of yet. 🥲

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

They've been using AI to detect things like that for a long time. (AI in general not LLMs as far as I know.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

All I can say is my feed has been shit since it happened.

[–] Logh@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago

I knew something was odd. I watch youtube without an account and in the past few days, when trying to watch some of my favorite channels youtube prompted me to “lognin to prove” I’m not a bot. This was only for a handful of channels, others seem to work fine.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A German YouTuber tested it with an unlisted video, I can’t find it as of now but I do find a lot of deleted videos in my liked ones…

How exactly? Because if it was just watching the video and looking at the view count shown under the video as others making this claim have done: That thing isnt updated in real time and also fuzzes the real number making this way of testing misleading.

I am not sure about the AdSense metrics page, tho.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

I've heard before that you need to wait 24h before checking the view count again. Although, yeah, I believe you can get more up-to-date counts as the uploader.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I don't understand how anyone used YouTube anymore. I'm not going to spend 5 minutes solving a captcha every time I want to watch a 2 minute video.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I've literally never seen a captcha on YouTube

Edit: Also, I generally watch 30+ minute YouTube videos from people I'm specifically subscribed to

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's because you're logged into an account. And they track and make money from you

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's not about being logged out. Something about your browser configuration is messed up, or your ip address is blacklisted, giving you frequent captchas.

On a clean browser and IPV4 you get zero captchas without being logged in

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, something about your setup is messed up. Likely they can fingerprint and identity you.

If your IP address were shared by many users and you had a properly configured browser to defeat fingerprinting, then they torture you with captchas to force you to login, so they can profit off of you

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I use FreeTube frequently as well

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I've literally never had to do that? And with uBlock Origin I don't see ads at all.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That means they're tracking you

OK. I'd already assumed they are.

[–] colin@lemmy.uninsane.org 4 points 4 days ago

just heads up if you're getting captchas on YT you'll probably start getting those on other Google services over time too.

it snowballs like this: YouTube decides you're a bot => you use less YouTube => Google/Alphabet gets less information/fingerprints of you => Google Search decides you're a bot => you switch to a different search engine => Google Maps decides you're a robot ...

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 2 points 4 days ago

I pay for it, because I've always watched a lot of it and I got used to "YouTube Premium" when it was called "YouTube Red" and came free with "Google Music" (now called "YouTube Music").

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

The experience on iOS using Safari+AdGuard+BakingSoda+Vinegar or simply the Orion browser is flawless. No ads, play videos with locked screen.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I saw Josh Strife Hayes talking about this and I think he was collecting some data to potentially do a video on it? Will be interesting to see the results and if they match up with this.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Yes! The one I mentioned quoted Josh and went further with his research