this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2025
25 points (90.3% liked)

Flippanarchy

1635 readers
446 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey friends, just trying to get an idea of how people think of capitalism in different communities. What first comes to mind when you think of that word? Is it your national or international retail giants, resource extraction, or logistics companies? Or perhaps your local diner, hardware or convenience store? The black market? Or something else?

top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I can't decide between a cancerous growth or a ball of wriggling intestinal parasites - I guess it'll have to be the former since this is insulting to intestinal parasites.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

We should update it. The wealthy are above soldiers and police with bail out money or just taking a private jet to a private island without laws.

Heck, some fucks are so rich they might actually stand above the ruling class. Which is logical considering the only thing that does matter in capitalism isn’t who you are but how much wealth you hoard.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

I was just thinking I'd love to see this with a modern cast of characters.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Rape.

It is rape, in every possible sense, in many different contexts or layers of complexity.

Coercive, forceful and subtle, manipulative and brash, extraction and destruction, that gaslights and lies and normalizes itself.

It never asks for consent, it either assumes it or demands it, and escaping it is often quite difficult and very risky to attempt.

But it rapes everything.

The land, the environment, people's bodies and minds and their time and their thoughts, language itself, etc.

The more technical details of how and why this metaphor is apt... the various aspects of complexities of different systems or aspects of subsystems... at the end of the day, the nature or character common to any specific instance of capitalism is that of a rapist.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When I used to call capitalism and colonialism rapacious I got a lot of finger-wagging and handwringing from people calling themselves leftists... so I guess this means progress?

Maybe in five years' time we could get leftists to actually start referring to capitalists as parasites.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Those kinds of 'leftists' largely turned out to be an idpol flavor of shitlib, in at least my personal experience.

They really just wanted rainbow capitalism with approximately 25% more welfare state.

Ask any of those people, back then, to attempt to formulate a political strategy that... you know, might actually achieve that?

They either got offended by the question, or their answer was somewhere between 'just keep raising awareness (via wholly corporately owned communication platforms)' and 'manifesting'.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Wow, this is easily the most extreme response I've received on the topic. What led you to feel this way?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

There is no response extreme enough when it comes to this topic.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I have degrees in both econ and poli sci and have worked at multiple Fortune 500 companies as a high level data analyst / software dev / db admin.

I got those degrees during the GWOT and GFC, and argued against bailouts without jailing those responsible...

...and got called a conspiracy theorist by a Poli Sci professor when I wrote a paper on 'conflict goods' about the US military guarding opium fields in Afghanistan.

Despite me citing my sources and even linking to an on the ground Fox News interview with a soldier who just straight up said that is what his unit was doing.

I also have studied the history of the industries I worked in, as well as just human history in general, in my spare time.

... I have also been homeless for a year or two.

I have lived a life of the extremes most people only ever come close to one of, stuffy and cocky corpo wealth and entitlement and social status jockeying mind games, and immense deprivation, near constant direct physical and mental trauma.

But if you would like maybe a more formal argument that capitalism objectively is raping the planet to death:

Here's London's Society of Actuaries, they've run the numbers and determined that our capitalism-driven, collective inability to stop climate change...

... is going to destroy the world, and thus future GDP projections.

https://actuaries.org.uk/media-release/current-climate-policies-risk-catastrophic-societal-and-economic-impacts/

My own guesstimate models point at something like 1 to 3 billion people dying in the next 25 years from the chaos that will result from increasingly extreme climate and climate disasters.

But those are roughly in line with more updated versions of MIT's old World 3 / Limits to Growth model.

tl:dr;

Why do I feel this extreme way?

Because I know what I am talking about, theoretically, practically and personally.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for the write up my friend. Was that Fox news report with Geraldo Rivera? I remember seeing something like that back in the early or mid 2000s. I couldn't believe my eyes.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I... don't remember if it was Geraldo.

I want to say it was a less well known reporter, who actually made the trek all the way out to... I think Helmand Province (sp?)?

But... yeah.

That was almost 20 years ago now lol.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Found it, fucking wild - https://youtu.be/AUATfLDiwVA

I still can't believe it. I'm watching it and it feels like I'm currently experiencing a fever dream.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Same here bud... its all gone so utterly, thoroughly wrong.

But hey, nice work finding that!

[–] SpookyLights@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Marines weren't ordered to protect the poppy fields, they were ordered to not destroy them. Big difference

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

they were ordered to not destroy them.

Most of the Afghanistan vets who I've heard talk about this doesn't seem to place much importance on that distinction.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago

Thank you for putting to words what I've been feeling for a while.

[–] Smookey4444@anarchist.nexus 8 points 3 days ago

Exploitation. Everything is built around exploitation. Of course capitalism is not the only exploitive system that exists, it's just the one most visible to us.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 17 points 4 days ago

Exploitation of workers (and others) through means of private property rights that are enforced through state violence to the benefit of only a few.

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A big ball that consumes all it touches, that will destroy the world if it can because that is part of its purpose.

It is disabling, and has conditioned people to accept it through its unlimited use of propaganda and wars in order to control the populace.

It takes and takes and gives little back.

It is against how things should be, and could be said to be unnatural.

It is about power and control over the populace, sadly few realise this because of said propaganda and because they believe nothing better could exist due to it limiting their imagination, time, energy and organising.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The 'big ball that consumes all' might be my favorite imagery used as a response to this question. Thank you 😊

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

You're welcome. It is genuinely how we imagine it.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

Hierarchy and exploitation.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For me capitalism is the rudimentary ideology that values capital/power above life.

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 6 points 4 days ago

Greed without personal responsibility.

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There’s a looney toons episode t remember watching in the 80’s about a guy who makes a pair of boots and sells them for the material to make two, selling those to get more material, and keeps growing. Eventually he’s got a factory, a bunch of workers but he can never rest, never enjoy the fruits of his labor because capitalism demands perpetual growth. He dies wealthy but his soul died years before. I’m pretty sure my memory of this is somewhat twisted being that it was 40+ years ago, but that little guy repeatedly asking “now I get to relax?” And being told by the narrator “no” has always seemed so sad to me. Capitalism was painted as soul crushing even during the Cold War, and yet we still blindly go that route.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for to the response. I think I found it - https://youtu.be/89buUHeuT44

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

That looks more like a bunch of different episodes smashed together. The one I’m thinking of is in there, it was the parts where Elmer Fudd is an elf wearing a crown talking to the random old man.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

i think of it as the most basic and rudimentary economic system.

whenever a more advanced system fails or can't apply, people fall back to capitalism and start trading/hoarding tokens etc.

it's dangerous to let it run completely unchecked. usually societies will implement rules and taxes to make sure basic needs are met and there isn't too much exploitation going on.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Basic and rudimentary is a unique take. What led you to this conclusion?

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

no, it's not a unique take.

capitalism is the next step after an exchange economy, which is the most basic economy possible. just add some sort of token to the exchange economy and it becomes capitalism.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like you are referencing some well known economic model progression or evolution that I'm unfamiliar with. Is there a name for this or someplace I can read more about it? What is the more advanced economic model after capitalism?

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

idk how it's called. it's something kids have early in school. it's about the four types of economic systems. it's not really about progression, but about how difficult they are to set up and how they start from the need to exchange goods and can transform from one type to another. for example bartering (traditional type) to capitalistic monetary systems (market type) and then maybe someone takes control and establishes socialism (command type) etc..

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Interesting, thanks for the feedback and followup!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Agreed! Capitalism works great until the wealthy buy the politicians and the voters lose their moral compass. Then you have what we see today, late stage capitalism. No reason we can't break the monopolies and tax the snot out of the rich, but your average Joe Blow either doesn't realize what's happening or care, doesn't demand good governance.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

In practice? Inequality. Increasing inequality until something cracks and there are riots, then laws change. Then increasing inequality, rinse and repeat.

In theory? Small entrepreneurial businesses generating value, the grassroots little shops everywhere. If it was working correctly, those would be very profitable and the money spread around better. Growth from the bottom not the discredited "trickle down" bullshit.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Hey congrats! I think you are the first person to give something close to the textbook definition of what capitalism says it is supposed to be! 🤸

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Death cult. You can't infinitely extract value from a finite system.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Mmm, the shrinking markets problem. Thanks!

[–] alzymologist@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Thugs explaining that you owe them for protection and a interest on that too.

Also ayn rand slutty face with a whip and a cocktail

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Haha, you've placed an image of Ayn Rand in my mind that I wish I could erase. 😂

A positive feedback loop of wealth disparity.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Dumpster fire.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Easy target for life's problems.

[–] dirigibles@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

A very rare response to this question. Why do you feel that way?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

Not target but root cause.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 3 points 4 days ago

I think capitalism is an easy target because it’s often the root cause of life’s problems, or a contributing factor.