1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
"For example, a sports fan could simply purchase a day pass and watch select programming, such as a highly popular sports game, without purchasing a month-long subscription or paying a higher pay-per-view fee."
WOW. The greed is insane! What total pieces of sh*t! They're not even hiding it
To paraphrase:
"For example, someone could purchase a single sandwich, instead of a loaf of bread, several pounds of meat and cheese, various produce items, and a few jars of condiments."
Do they not see how dumb they sound!?
The quote is chefs kiss they’re not even trying to hide that shit. Imagine you could watch a sports event without getting virtually mugged
They're suing over the creation of competition in the market? Certainly an interesting strategy. I hope WB, Disney, and every other scum-sucker that thinks suing is acceptable gets raked across the coals.
Yeah, this sure sounds like the "free market" correcting itself as these people love to prattle on about.
This is suing for the ability to price fix.
They said it without directly saying it. They want to be able to price fix to keep their investors happy and someone is now stepping on the toes of the investors and they want to force sling to raise their price or pay them (mafia tactics) to continue operating.
Any company involved in this lawsuit should be forced to provide their subscription to all current users for free for the next 2-5 years or shutter their streaming service indefinitely.
I know what it's about. Best part is that at an entry fee of $5, Sling aren't even undercutting the market enough to allow an anti-competition lawsuit against them. So long as Sling can afford the lawyer fees, a dismissal and reversal should be a cake walk.
it pretty much depends on what their distribution agreements have in them--there could be something in there that requires monthly or longer terms for subscribers. if there isn't, there sure af will be from now on for streaming services carrying 'cable' channels
This is basically mafia. Boycott them, people!
The passes fundamentally disrupt this industry-standard model
Funny how they didn't care about how streaming in general disrupted cable. Or how cable disrupted broadcast. Or how tv disrupted radio ...
"Video Killed The Radio Star", even, was distributed in Canada and Brazil by WEA [Warner, Elektra, Atlantic], according to Discogs. Interesting!
EDIT: But wait for their next big release with a more aggressive tone: "Sling TV Pissed Off Conglomerates"...
Sling couldn't have asked for a better marketing campaign
I was actually going to comment that I now know about this cheap option thanks to the lawsuit, lol.
I don't watch live TV because I value my time, but every once in a while there's a reason to tune into that one thing.
i ask everyone i meet if they've accepted their lord and saviour jellyfin into their lives.
I pray to no false gods. But I do cherish Jellyfins daddy Emby. I would probably use Jellyfin but I have a lifelong emby paid from donating when they first took over MB.
I too have lifetime Emby and still use it today. Media browser renamed to Emby. They took the M and B from the old name to get the new one.
Wake me up when Jellyfin does live sports
It already does. Just google iptv on jellyfin and find one of the articles that teaches you how to load a .m3u into jellyfin. Boom live tv.
It's a little annoying to get going but it's doable.
Jellyfin can use .m3u playlists for live TV. It’s a bit of work to get it going, but it is possible.
Wrong prophet but I like the religion.
This is so petty and a perfect example of why american capitalism is horrible and the government does nothing to control corporations or monopolies.
So it's the lightbulb syndicate again eh?
I always wonder why people venerate Edison so much. He did innovate, but man was he a shifty barron.
Edison's lightbulb invention story makes for a really good rugged individual story. Dude keeps trying after 400 failures finally finds the one that worked and becomes rich and famous for it
Ah yes, American exceptionalism. Silly me. Have to win as an underdog. If only we had education and learning history as part of our American ethos.
The passes fundamentally disrupt this industry-standard model by allowing customers to purchase access to the most sought-after programmin
Wait wait wait, I thought disruption was good? 🤔
Only when Silicon Valley does it to someone else!
Normally I'd say Sling didn't have a prayer under this administration, but Disney has pissed everybody off - including the Grand Cheeto - so I'm just gonna go stock up on some popcorn...
There's maybe a bit of an argument here if Sling is subsidizing their low prices with losses or debt or revenue from other projects. And let's be real here... that's absolutely what they're doing, cause that's what they ALL do. Offer services at unsustainable prices, in the hope of cornering a chunk of the market, and exploiting it for profit, later.
...access to the most sought-after programming, such as major sports events, essentially a la carte for a fraction of the cost..
KEK, this sounds like the best add ever for Sling TV.
you know whats cheaper than sling? VPN!
🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
⛵🌊
🎶Yo ho, yo ho, a pirate's life for me🎶
🎶We pillage, we plunder, we rifle, and loot🎶
We download and jailbreak and don't give a hoot
Business idea: Get subscriptions to Disney and ESPN streaming services, then let other people buy access to those accounts for one day at a time. You'd log in for them and give them the session cookie, or something like that. Shouldn't be too hard to find a country in which that isn't breaking any laws, although I'm guessing it's probably not the USA.
It's certainly breaking TOS, so the country you're in doesn't matter.
I'm not a lawyer, but I suspect that you may be overestimating the extent to which every piece of bullshit inserted into a TOS document that nobody reads is universally enforceable.
It's not a legal issue. They'd just shut down any accounts doing this. They already detect and shut down account sharing and this is just a variant of that. No law or government intervention necessary.
One could make it technically somewhat difficult to shut down, but better yet would be to get some timely government intervention, on the side of defending our rights to do such things on the same kind of principle as the well-established doctrine of first sale.