this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
118 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

72440 readers
2494 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ubermeisters@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Nobody can regulate themselves. There. I made a whole lot of things easier.

[–] CharlesMangione@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

An artificial intelligence designed to the task could, but

[–] hersh@literature.cafe 6 points 2 years ago

But then it will follow hallucinated regulations.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My conspiracy theory is that AI is already running OpenAI, which explains all the weird erratic decisions

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

What do you mean we weren't trained on boardroom shadow takeovers by 49% non-voting members scenarios?

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago

...and they shouldn't even if they could.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago

Nobody can regulate themselves, that's like... the whole point of regulation

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Expand that to any of the toddler-brained tech bros and you've got a plan started.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because we want a bunch of 80 year olds telling tech what to do.

[–] db2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They already do that. Doesn't make the Elons not also a problem.

[–] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

I'd rather the problem that can't send armed goons after me.

[–] GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

Spoiler alert: No business regulates themselves effectively. Those that do only do it under duress of govt doing it if they don't.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

In other words, this is more corporate propaganda trying to vilify open source LLMs because they can bypass regulations.

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 years ago

Tell me one industry that's ever self regulated properly.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They can't, businesses explicitly are incompatible with self-regulation. I'm not saying let's overregulate the hell out of everything and stop all growth and prevent anything from being possible, but I think there's probably a middle ground here.