this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
69 points (97.3% liked)

News

33994 readers
5071 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a brief hearing Monday afternoon, U.S. District Judge April Perry said she was “very troubled” by the Justice Department’s attorneys’ inability to answer her questions about where the guardsmen would be deploying and what exactly they’d be doing.

“If I were the federal government, I’d strongly urge holding off until Thursday,” she said of the plan to activate troops. But she added, it’s “up to them.” During the hearing, the DOJ confirmed that members of the Texas National Guard were scheduled to board a plane for Chicago at 4 p.m. But, attorney Jean Lin said, those out-of-state guardsmen would not be “in position to perform their federal protective mission” until Tuesday at the earliest. Members of the Illinois National Guard would similarly not be mobilized until later this week, pending pre-mission trainings, Lin said.

Christopher Wells of the Illinois attorney general’s office pleaded with Perry to grant “some form of interim relief” before Thursday’s hearing. He pointed to the “level of disregard the administration has shown” to a federal judge in Oregon who over the weekend ruled Trump’s deployment of the National Guard to Portland exceeded his authority. Despite two rulings from the Trump-appointed judge, the feds have mobilized guardsmen anyway from California and Texas to the west coast city.

“This is all part of a concerted effort to target disfavored jurisdictions that the president doesn’t like,” Wells said, urging a temporary restraining order before the federal government “hostilely deploys troops from another state to a sister and equally sovereign state.”

Though she denied his request, Perry sided with Wells’ contention that the Trump administration’s request for an entire week to respond to the lawsuit was “ridiculous” given “they have been planning this for months.”

But since neither Perry nor the DOJ lawyers had been able to read all 500 pages of the state and city’s legal filings, the judge said she would delay her ruling.

“It’s unclear to me, frankly, whether they’re even going to be deployed between now and Thursday — and I mean deployed in the nonmilitary sense,” Perry said. “Whether they will be out on the street and engaging in activity … I simply don’t know that and neither do you.”

Archived at https://archive.is/r1sqC

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is it ironic when the government tries to overthrow the people?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Not even a little.

[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If I were her, I'd use these couple of days to move all my stuff out of the house before they burn it down.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

well im sure the founding fathers completely intended to give the president authority to allow one state to invade another /s

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Wow, we might get a strongly worded letter, maybe even a finger wagging!

Fucking Christ. Where is the sense of urgency in the justice system? The troops are acting now, yet the judge still granted a whole week before even the arguments are heard.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Remember when you were a kid and there were all those weird and funny myths about putting things on railway tracks that would cause it to derail?

Hahah. Childhood was funny.