this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
568 points (97.7% liked)

linuxmemes

27800 readers
509 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     

    i just really hate snap

    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Covenant@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    I always read 'did not finish'

    [–] eta@feddit.org 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    The most racing of all the package managers

    [–] tungah@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

    Or the least.

    [–] Hawke@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

    DNFΒ (abbreviation forΒ Dandified YUM)

    These guys at Redhat don’t know how abbreviations work, I guess.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

    I always see "did not find"

    [–] Thyazide@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

    I used to work at the devil and I heard DNF from players all the time. Once I realized DNF was the package manager in fedora (recent switch) I never forgot the command again. It's burned into my brain.

    [–] silenium_dev@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

    dnf5 ist pretty fast, almost pacman/apk level fast

    [–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

    I've been specifically avoiding Ubuntu because of snaps, instead preferring Ubuntu derivatives that don't use it, like Mint and Pop.

    And more recently, trying an entirely different approach with Arch.

    And yes - I could get rid of snaps in Ubuntu if I wanted. But everything is just a little more annoying when you are going against the conventions of your distro.

    [–] olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    You could try Debian, it's basically Ubuntu without snaps.

    [–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

    More like Ubuntu is Debian with snaps and a CEO

    [–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

    I could.

    Though I suppose it may be semantically more appropriate to say that Ubuntu is Debian with snaps (and with a bunch of other stuff too)

    [–] Kuro@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

    Thank you! It always irritates me when someone does say Debian is Ubuntu but without XYZ... No, Debian was first. Ubuntu is a Debian child that got molded into something that no Linux should ever be..

    [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

    Linux Mint is Debian with snaps without snaps!
    (I am now going to take this opportunity to point you all towards Linux Mint DE (Debian Edition))

    [–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    switched to Debian from fedora after IBM started sticking their little dick fingers in everything.

    [–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

    little dick fingers

    Definitely stealing this

    [–] teft@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

    I installed Linux Mint Debian Edition yesterday. I like it so far. Lots better than ubuntu.

    [–] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I love pop, just so you know πŸ™‚

    [–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
    [–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

    They could be talking about bubble wrap to be fair

    [–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

    It's made even worse by some software pretending to be Ubuntu builds but just quietly installing a Snap version instead.

    Looking at you, Firefox. πŸ‘€

    Switched to EndeavourOS a couple of years ago as my main, and its been amazing. No regrets.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Venator@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
    [–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

    obligatory "something something aur is a haunted wasteland and it's your fault for ignoring the forty warning signs"

    [–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    I just don't see the point of them when there are flatpaks. I'm not super knowledgeable on Snaps so maybe there's some huge benefit I don't know about, but they always just seemed like a worse version of flatpak to me.

    [–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 6 days ago

    The benefit to me is that snaps update as soon as the patch is pushed and they sandbox better than flatpak. Its also easier to maintain a snap from a dev perspective (idk if thats true I just read it on some fourm)

    I prefer flatpak because i like the name and flathub better but the development has kind of stagnated and a lot of their benefits are non existent. Flatpak sandbox is kind of a meme at the moment because most apps ask for way to many perms just to work.

    [–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    The huge benefit (to canonical) is that they control the store/repo.

    [–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    How exactly is that a benefit?

    [–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

    I should have added a /s.

    Canonical controls the back end and that (along with how canonical has treated snaps in Ubuntu pulling them in with apt calls) are two major reasons snaps get (justified) hate

    [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I don’t see the point of flatpaks when there are appimages.

    Anyway last I heard snap has terminal/server apps and more system interaction.

    [–] waldfee@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    What I like about flatpaks over appimages is that they will get updated, be included in the application list, and not live inside my Downloads Directory

    Also deduplication is nice

    I have been using an app called gear lever to manage my app images and I am very happy.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] lengau@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

    Everything on the system, including the desktop, kernel, and CUPS, can be installed by snap.

    [–] allywilson@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

    Until recently, I've had no real preference as mostly using RHEL clones at work. Now using Ubuntu...and snap has been causing issues.

    [–] rozodru@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I have ubuntu on my server and I really need to switch it. It's such a dick move when you apt install something and it opts for a snap. I just roll my eyes and groan when I think of having to back up EVERYTHING (music, media, dockers configs, compiled projects, random projects, etc) in order to switch the distro. I dont' have the time to do it. It's like nearly 2TB worth of stuff.

    [–] addie@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    Isn't the default installation of Ubuntu to BTRFS? In which case, you should have an @ subvolume with Ubuntu that's mounted to /, and an @home subvolume that's mounted to /home.

    Make a new subvolume, install a new operating system into it, and choose that subvolume in the bootloader, should be able to have Ubuntu and 'your favourite OS' (I use Arch btw) living side-by-side with the same home directory.

    ....you can do that? Huh.

    i've been waiting for an update to break Cachy, before reinstalling, but nothing seems to break like my previous Arch based distros. I put BTRFS on everything because snapshots are the best.

    [–] teft@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    What’s snap? I use LMDE and i don’t think i have that.

    [–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    It's Canonicals' package manager. A lot of people, myself included, dislike it mostly because the backend is proprietary and it locks the repository to Canonical only. Also given their past history, it may be doing something nefarious.

    [–] janus2@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    it fucking up my Firefox was nefarious enough

    [–] Guilvareux@feddit.uk 3 points 1 week ago

    Dunno what it’s like these days but brought steam to a crawl when I last used it

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] ptc075@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

    So, I'm a novice Linux user and have been on Ubuntu for maybe 2 years now. And I'm just starting to hit the SNAPS wall - IE, just a bit too much of what I want doesn't install through snaps. Is there a good progression for my "next distro after Ubuntu?". Still need some training wheels, but ready to take the next step.

    [–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

    Is there a good progression for my "next distro after Ubuntu?".

    Yes. Linux Mint has got your back.

    [–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

    I also vouch for Mint in your case because it’s based on Ubuntu there is less of a learning curve than Fedora/OpenSuse

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

    Look at Fedora or OpenSUSE.

    [–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Another vote for Mint. I run Mint on anything graphical and straight Debian on anything headless; ten years ago that was Ubuntu and Debian instead

    [–] altphoto@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

    When our powers combine we become....! Ah shit! I need yo reinstall, the snap is reading from the apt folder again!

    [–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Where is Nix? Oh right, he's in space, chilling.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] mistermodal@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

    It's fine Snap, I didn't need to be able to set a default browser or connect it to other programs anyways ☺️

    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί