this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
803 points (97.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

42679 readers
1305 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pir8t0x@ani.social 2 points 3 days ago

I guess I'm lucky that this ain't happening for me at least

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 77 points 6 days ago (2 children)

"This will allow Youtube to locate the best content" 🀑

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's so insulting they add flavour text like this as if to call you a fucking moron to your face

[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

β€œWe know what’s best for you”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kamen@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But I don't want the best content.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

I want the old YouTube

[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 33 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Listen at this point, we either re-upload our favorite creator's content to other platforms. Convince them to join alternatives or help out *their replacements" on those alternative platforms to grow.

Either way I do not respect content-creators that do not support alternative platforms (& decentralization) on principle

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Listen at this point, we either re-upload our favorite creator’s content to other platforms. Convince them to join alternatives or help out their replacements on thise alternative platforms to grow.

I am with this, tired of using a yt frontend to watch videos (sometimes real website), and no reuploads nor have alternatives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 67 points 6 days ago (17 children)

They always could. What appears to be happening is that channels now have the option to turn on "a switch" so that content wont play if a VPN is detected. Most VPN ip addresses are well known, because they arent a secret. Everyone who uses the VPN goes through it.

If you come across the above message, its because the content creator turned it on. I had it come up with "stick to football". Its the only thing that it comes up with. I just unsubbed and wont watch anymore. Im not turning off my VPN for anyone or anything. Id rather just go with out. I encourage all of you to do the same.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I mean... detecting (some) VPNs is as trivial as

fetch('https://github.com/NazgulCoder/IPLists/raw/refs/heads/main/output/vpn-ipv4.txt').then( res => res.text() ).then( res => console.log( res.includes( "1.2.3.4" ) ) )

thanks to https://github.com/NazgulCoder/IPLists/

FWIW though I did try, connected via a random VPN from ProtonVPN from Argentina... and it wasn't in that list. So it's not perfect. Also ProtonVPN has apparently today 13K servers according to https://protonvpn.com/vpn-servers

That being said I can imagine that Google, which is literally built on crawling the Web, has all the infrastructure and expertise needed to have such lists and up to date ones.

I'm not justifying blocking VPN here, only trying to clarify that unless you self-host in a rather specific setup (i.e. not relying a popular cloud provider but truly self hosting) it's technically not hard to block VPNs.

[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago

Understanding is the first step to fighting draconian policies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrinkyCrow@pawb.social 13 points 5 days ago

I'm so damn tired of corporations telling me what I can and can't do.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 6 days ago (2 children)

When I see content blocks like that anymore, I just leave the content behind and go elsewhere. Malicious companies will not get my clicks. They can fuck right off.

Good sign though, means they are getting desperate. It is our duty to starve them of traffic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The "best content" being ip-located ads, probably.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xylight@lemdro.id 56 points 6 days ago

I encounter VPN blocks everywhere frequently. I usually just reroll my selected server until the block goes away

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

They always could, they're just more confident these days.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (3 children)

VPN ads seriously need to stop promising that you can get around content restrictions.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

People should educate others on how to get content not available in their area for free without the hassle.

If media isn't available in your area, then the company is telling you they don't want your money. There is a $0.00 loss to them if you pirate it.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Unless you calculate it using the Nintendo formula, in which case you owe them $3 million.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reddifuge@lemmy.world 40 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Well, they need to make sure the right people are watching the right propaganda.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oh, so what they’re really saying is that a platform owned by GOOGLE has trouble FINDING the best content?

Everyone knows.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If you find what you're looking for the first time, they can't serve you as many ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 35 points 6 days ago (8 children)

My ISP has started throttling YouTube to ~2mbps when viewed from desktop. Using a VPN gets around this and lets me watch in HD. Luckily I've not encountered this error yet, but if I do I guess it's no more YouTube for me, 480p is just way too blurry to put up with.

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why would your ISP do that?

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They're 5g based, so I suspect it's within the terms of service somewhere that they can limit the streaming quality? Historically I'd only ever noticed deprioritization, never a hard bandwidth limit.

Rip net neutrality

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 15 points 5 days ago

This will allow Youtube to locate ~~the best content~~ and spy on you more easily

FTFY

[–] Mattr@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (6 children)

It's time to switch to Newpipe or Invidious, YouTube clients focused on privacy, without adverts and without Google's clutches.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Marzanna@scribe.disroot.org 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You will definitely get the best content in the countries where YouTube is blocked /s

"In order to enhance your viewing experience, we've sold your data to your government"

The man sighs as he read the text on his computer screen, as loud knocking is heard on his apartment door. He looks through the peephole, there are men with uniforms outside.

[Ending 42/666, The Gulag Ending]

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 25 points 6 days ago

Sure, there's big lists of them right here.

https://github.com/az0/vpn_ip

Hardly a secret.

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

youtube sucks ever since googol bought it. I cannot believe people still use it.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Google bought YouTube in like 2006. I liked it before they bought it, sure, but I would be hard pressed to say it’s been all downhill after the first year.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Dude, I seem to find more sites that break when using my VPN than those that allow it. The bastards are winning

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'll change servers a couple times, and if it still doesn't work, I'll just move on

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

I have a Tridactyl rule to rewrite YouTube URL to youtube-local (repository https://github.com/user234683/youtube-local/ ) e.g. https://www.youtube.com/ becomes http://localhost:9999/https://www.youtube.com but as others have suggested, I do my bet to avoid YouTube entirely, because Google is bad, Big Tech is bad.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

Tip: Peertube Companion is a good extension for directing you to duplicates of the video you're trying to watch if it can be found elsewhere.

[–] canofcam@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Everything detects VPNs. Reddit has an error screen I've never seen before about network activity when I use a VPN and I'm not logged in. YouTube refuses to let me watch embedded videos when I'm on my VPN. Many pages simply refuse to load.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] foggianism@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I watched youtube religously 10-15 years ago. Now when I try to enjoy some content, I struggle to find anything of quality that's in my feed. Sometimes I'm scrolling for 10 minutes and give up. Their algorithm for what might interest me was so much better back then.

[–] fin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago

locate the best content

Hell nah, please dont

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

That's probably not too hard to detect based on IP. They only do it for some content though. The only content I watch that has this block is official Formula 1 content on YouTube. It's probably something that creators can enable when they want to region lock content or something

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

People don't realize how much shit youtube/google ignores over time, for whatever reasons (but mostly because it's cheaper to ignoer I'd guess). With most major consumer VPN providers, this is very easy to detect. Adblockers are easy to detect. Tampering with the website structure? Believe it or not, quite easy to detect when someone hide a component or change a title or a button.

If they decided to seriously get after people that circumvent geofencing, people that block ads, people that change the interface to their liking, or people that plainly use alternative websites, they could easily. And it would require far less effort on their end to keep things complicated than it would require on our end to keep things working at an acceptable level.

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Only kind of true.

If they did implement all those measures, all you do is launch a puppet browser rendered off screen and scrape the content you want. This could work for any site and it is impossible for anyone to detect.

For ads, as a nuclear option, you can detect when they occur and black the stream out.

I would personally do this if left with no other option.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί