this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
88 points (100.0% liked)

News

33602 readers
2211 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Heritage Foundation reaffirmed its admiration for Tucker Carlson, saying it wanted to “put to rest” the speculation that the right-wing think tank was “distancing itself” from the former Fox News star in the wake of conservative outrage over Carlson’s friendly interview with notorious white nationalist Nick Fuentes.

Earlier this week, online sleuths noticed that the Heritage Foundation had quietly removed references to Carlson from a donation page that is sponsored by the conservative pundit’s media company.

After conservative policy analyst Jason Hart pointed out that the donation page still referenced the ex-Fox News host, he tagged Heritage Foundation president Kevin Roberts on X and asked if it was “intentional” that the page was still live.

Hours later, Hart noted that the think tank had scrubbed all references to Carlson. Indeed, the current URL for the page does not mention the right-wing commentator at all, whereas the previous version included a quote from Carlson praising both Roberts and the foundation.

The observation from Hart came as Carlson was facing intense backlash from much of the Christian right and Jewish conservatives over his sitdown with one-time foe Fuentes. While the two-hour chat featured Fuentes singing the praises of Josef Stalin, bemoaning the problem of “organized Jewry in America,” and telling Carlson the importance of being “pro-white, there was one moment in particular that really sparked anger from a large number of conservatives.

As Mother Jones reported this week, the “online skirmish over Carlson’s remarks about Christian Zionists is only the latest evidence to emerge of a growing fissure on the right over the extent to which the United States should be involved in foreign conflicts, especially those in the Middle East.” Vox, meanwhile, noted that the interview was further proof of the GOP’s “antisemitism crisis” and the “looming Republican civil war over Jews.”

Amid the speculation that the Heritage Foundation was ditching Carlson over the uproar, Roberts posted a social media video on Thursday afternoon in which he insisted that the MAGA provocateur remained in the organization’s good graces.

Noting that “Christians can critique the state of Israel without being antisemitic,” adding that “antisemitism should be condemned.” After saying his loyalty as a Christian was to “America first,” Roberts then seemingly took multiple swipes at Carlson’s right-wing critics.

“Conservatives should feel no obligation to reflexively support any foreign government, no matter how loud the pressure becomes from the globalist class or from their mouthpieces in Washington,” he declared, adding that Heritage Foundation wouldn’t be “policing the consciences of Christians.”

After saying he would defend Carlson from “slander of bad actors who serve someone else’s agenda,” Roberts also appeared to offer a defense of Fuentes, suggesting that he was a victim of cancel culture.

“I disagree with, and even abhor, things that Nick Fuentes says, but canceling him is not the answer either,” he said. “When we disagree with a person's thoughts and opinions, we challenge those ideas in a debate.”

Roberts' remarks sparked their own wave of outrage from conservatives and the center-right, with centrist writer Matthew Yglesias claiming “the groypers are winning”, referencing Fuentes’ army of followers.

“The Heritage Foundation is afraid of Tucker Carlson and his audience,” anti-Trump conservative David French reacted. “The fringe is now the mainstream, and one of the most powerful institutions in the American right is bending the knee.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

“I disagree with, and even abhor, things that Nick Fuentes says, but canceling him is not the answer either,” he said. “When we disagree with a person's thoughts and opinions, we challenge those ideas in a debate.”

That is a wild statement. He's all but equating "cancelation" with violence.

Also, he definitely doesn't disagree with or abhor anything Fuentes says. They just want to market the same shit to different audiences.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was wondering if there was any way to see whether following CK's death of other right-wing pundits either toned down or got more emboldened overall.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 month ago

Nazi cabal being a Nazi cabal. Nothing new here.