this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
54 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

13896 readers
147 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More dangerous and selfish behaviour from drivers.

For those outside the UK “lollipop woman” is someone assigned to a pedestrian crossing outside schools in high vis and usually with a big “stop” sign (the lollipop). Absolutely no way a driver could not see them.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Glifted@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the US we call them "Crossing Guards".

"Lollipop woman" makes less sense but is way more fun to say

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The US needs more whimsy. “Crossing guard” just sounds way too formal

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What sort of psychopath will see a crossing with children and a lolipop and think "ohh i can definitely go through it"?

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

they'll move

/s

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

The punishments listed were points off their license and mandatory speed courses. does that not seem a bit light? Not sure what the equivalent laws would be but knowingly endangering people with a dangerous weapon seems like it should get more response

[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 weeks ago

Obviously drivers cannot be trusted, even with crossing guards trying to protect children. Going to have to install permanent bollards to prevent motor vehicle traffic. The UK loves to claim to keep children safe, right?

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago