A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.
As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title
The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.
If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.
These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.
Rules:
My home gaming PC is a ryzen 1500x and an Nvidia 1060 GPU. Old as hell but still runs most games.
Most people on steam probably have a rig with 4+ year old hardware, and after seeing what my little steam deck oled can do, id say the steam machine will be able to out perform any 4+ year old windows system when it comes to gaming.
so is my ps3
This kind of article, that just stretches out a simple point over a few hundred words, is absolutely infuriating to read.
TL;DR : Steam Machine has a laptop-grade low consumption GPU and will probably be more console-class than desktop-class. (Also, author has likely never taken a statistics class)
Okay, but the heat sink is 10x any laptop cooler I've seen.
Yeah why would valve try to place the steam machine at the gaming pc sector?
This sector is heavily contested by many sellers. And you can't be cheaper than building your own rig. And on top of that, almost every pc enthusiast has already steam installed, there is no point to build a pc for gaming for valve.
However when you go into the console space things are very different. The steam machine has no problem competing with an Xbox, PlayStation or Nintendo switch.
Now performance isn't everything, now you have steam on a console like pc. People can play their already owned games and by new ones for playing on the TV.
Idk why everyone is giving their input when all of you will line up and buy this no matter what.
Who? This isn't the Switch 2, I dunno where this is coming from...
I won't be. I've set up my old rig, a Ryzen 3600/Radeon 7600 mini-ITX machine on my television running Bazzite. AFAIK it's quite a similar experience to SteamOS (Launches in Steam big picture mode, can switch to a KDE desktop, immutable distro with flatpak apps), from what they've released, it seems my machine has relatively similar performance, it's about 3 times as big, but...I don't need a Steam Machine.
I might spring for a Steam Frame headset though.
Who are your referring to? I'm not gong to buy it. He'll, we don't even know the price.
We don't know the price, but I'm interested, weather I buy or not, will depend on the price.
As Linus (inferior) of LTT said, most products are not bad products, just bad price.
If it's cheaper than the top 30% I'll think about it. I haven't had a gaming capable PC in a long while and I HAVE wanted one, but I'm not paying $1000 for it
Approximate same power mini-pc - Minisforum HX99G, when being sold (discontinued as of today) used to be at a price around $800. Sometimes it was found to be sold at discount price of $700.
I want to believe that Steam Machines will be lower than that due to brand name recognition and mass production.
If it's not cheaper than a PS5 I don't think it's gonna catch on unfortunately. Xbox is obviously defunct by now but the ps has much much more wide ranging awareness than Steam. And to compete with that they'll need more than "it's twice as expensive but a little prettier" to the layman.
How many years of playstation plus more expensive could it be before it's too expensive?
I strongly doubt it'll be comparable in price to the PS5. They're sold at a loss by Sony. Valve has already made it clear they are not doing the same.
Absolutely agree. I keep seeing so many takes where they are ignoring that they specifically stated it was competing in the PC market, not the console market. I don't see it being less than $800. Id expect $1000+
On my Linux box or steam deck I can play latest cuttongbedge games, random bullshit going back yo the 70s, and any indie game off itch.io
It's got a pretty good back catalog advantage.
Twice as expensive? Cheaper than $700 is not twice as expensive as $500.
Sure, it'd be nice if it were $500 or less, but from what I understand, it isn't possible (I'd love to be proven wrong). PS is able to sell hardware at a loss to then recoup that loss in game sales. The Steam Machine is a PC. You don't have to buy anything from Steam to use it after you buy it. It cannot be sold at a loss - though I wouldn't be surprised to see Steam Machine packaged with games during sales to make it a better value for the same cost or something.
Moving from fact to opinion, I think the steam machine, for under $700, could be considered a better value than a PS or Xbox, for two reasons. The first is Steam Sales - you'll probably save a couple hundred bucks as compared to buying the same games on a console. Secondly, and more importantly, it's not only a gaming console for your living room, but also a PC for your living room as, when combined with the Steam Controller, I can't think of a better way to use a full desktop on my TV. The SteamDeck track pads make it totally practical to use a normal desktop without a mouse and keyboard. They're amazing for mousing, scrolling, and typing. I'll probably buy it for that alone - though the lack of support for DRM protected media might force me to continue using my Xbox as a media console - though I might also tell media platforms where to shove their DRM, becuase it obviously isn't working if I can acquire their media from other sources.
Tl;dr: it will likely be more expensive, as it can't be sold at a loss or tight margins - but cheaper games and the fact that it's a full fledged PC for your TV could make the additional cost make sense.
You're missing a big factor in value: PlayStation requires a subscription just to use online multiplayer. PC games don't. If someone buys a Steam Machine, even if they were the same price and same specs that person would be saving >$100 every year
Also steam has a massive library that PlayStation just doesn't have, the first game in my steam library is Fallout: New Vegas which I got in 2012 meanwhile the oldest game in my steam library is Wasteland which I believe realized in 1988. That alone gives steam a massive advantage since you can't really do that on console without some series modding.
I haven't used consoles for gaming in so long I forgot about that haha, good point.
One could argue that the Steam Hardware Survey being opt-in means that it's likely to overestimate the power of Steam users' computers, since people with fancy rigs are far more likely to want to brag about it.
I use it to show off me playing on Gentoo.
My first reaction to reading that line was that Linux numbers are likely inflated by sampling bias.
My other systems are SteamOS or Mint.
It's not like I'm dual booting Windows.
Perhaps, but a couple years ago when I still had a GTX 1050 I was happy to participate in the survey to show that a lot of gamers didn't have fancy RTX cards. I suspect there is a lot more low-end hardware on the survey than high-end.
My 960 using ass participated just a few months ago.
GTX 770 here!
On the other hand, I suspect that some people with high-end PC specs might be more on the "privacy inclined" side of the spectrum, and might prefer not to share data on principle.
Though, if I were to guess, yours is probably the larger influence.
This is very close I think to critics and movies. Critics will always be hyper critical of movies because, well, it's your job. You go in and watch movies all day - you're going to pick up on small details that most average watchers won't notice and you will be hyper critical of that.
Similar here, if your job is to play games and review hardware I'm guessing the writer of this thinks more people than not have huge gaming setups, when in reality Valve is right, most have a modest setup. They know they're not competing with ultra highend, those people are already in the bag. They're going after the casual people who maybe haven't updated their PC in 6 years and just want to play some newer games, getting them into the ecosystem. In short, it's hard to be a critic of a system that wasn't designed for you in mind. Hell it's not designed for me either.
That's is why i got a steam deck. My gaming laptop died and i was stuck with idk what this thing is. So having a set, reliable, and recent pc setup was perfect.
That's just not how statistics work. You never get 100% of the subjects to participate. But you get (in Steam's case) an enormous sample size, that very likely represents the vast majority of gamers.
The weird part is I think a lot of the disappointment comes from a lot of people with even high-end gaming systems wanted this to be the thing that replaces it just because they hate windows so much and because it wasn't as powerful they couldn't just buy this box and it would just do it
If they have a high end rig, they should be able to install the Steam Machine OS to it though, thus making it a high end Steam Machine?
Steam OS doesn't support Nvidia or Intel hardware. You'd be better off installing Bazzite
The steam machine is also guaranteed to have official driver support for everything on the board which is definitely not the case if you install steamos on any given gaming pc
What drivers? I didn't know steam made specific drivers for the steam machine? They only have it preconfigured?
I would assume they will for things like the built in steam controller antenna and whatever other custom parts they have but I was more saying that all the drivers for their hardware (and to a lesser degree the other hardware they’re supporting like the rog ally) should be included and maintained as part of steamos.
I would assume not. I've never had to install a specific driver for a generic controller. My levered and leverless controllers worked out of the box. It's just plug and play.
I would assume most controllers follow the usb hid standards and it's support is already built into the kernel. Same with Playstation controllers as well. Sony hid is inbuilt and steam hid is inbuilt. If the new controllers require new drivers it's going to be made a standard and be included in the Linux kernel so the controllers will be plug and play for all distros.
The controller was just an example but whether it’s part of steamos or built into the linux kernel isn’t really relevant as what I was trying to say is that valve has a vested interest in making sure it’s there and maintained, as opposed to your typical windows gaming pc and peripherals which do not have that guarantee as they are sold with an expectation that the users will be running windows.
Technically all surveys are opt-in. Gallup can't force you to answer questions when they call you on the phone. You could just hang up. It's rather silly to argue that opting in makes it an invalid survey.
This is a silly take. People are less likely to say no on the phone than they are to click no on a survey opt-in popup. And I am not even sure that Steam does a pop-up, users may have to go find the option to join the survey.
So there absolutely is a sampling bias. How significant it is and how/if Valve attempt to control for it doesn't seem to be public information but it is definitely there.
All right first of all no, you don't get to just claim that people are less likely to do something based on nothing. I'm not going to let that stand in this conversation. You got to prove that. If anything I'm much less likely to talk on the phone than I am to click on a pop up. Avoiding talking to people is one of my passions. So not only have you not proven it but it goes directly against my own inclinations and nature. I deny that 100%.
Also since you came to this conversation with no actual information apparently let me share something with you. It is a pop up. You probably should have checked on that before you based your argument on it. You don't have to go looking for it. Just pops up on your screen.
However I do agree with one point you raised here. There absolutely is a sampling bias. Just as I said in my previous post. And I appreciate you backing me up on that point. The bias is toward people who choose to answer the survey. As is true for all surveys.
Heh