this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
118 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
1892 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Besides convenience, one of the main benefits of self-driving cars is supposed to be safety.

Yet in a bizarre move, Waymo — whose self-driving cabs had been enjoying extraordinary safety metrics — has just taken steps to make its robotaxis more human-like, eroding the safety narrative that’s been central to the autonomous vehicle narrative.

Recent reporting by The Wall Street Journal observed a startling change in Waymos’ road etiquette, a new aggressive streak that would make a BMW driver blush. These include illegal U-turns, aggressive lane switching, rolling through cross walks, and running red lights.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] karashta@piefed.social 9 points 23 hours ago

This is the stupid shit I get instead of actual public transport and infrastructure. What a dumb timeline.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big Insurance is playing both sides

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

If this was an Onion article, the headline would have been "Waymo cars will now go through each hit pedestrian multiple times".

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

In a "Our cars are faster" move?

These include illegal U-turns, aggressive lane switching, rolling through cross walks, and running red lights.

They like fines?

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

They will never make it into Europe this way.
Good thing.

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yikes. I was just in SF for work. One of the things I liked best about wayno as a pedestrian is that you could confidently step out into the road in front of them and they would always slam their breaks so hard it never hit you, and the occupants would be all pissed about it

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 2 points 19 hours ago

Risking your life to inconvenience other people is a weird form of fun I must say.

[–] vetehinen@lethallava.land 1 points 19 hours ago

@tonytins@pawb.social a bit sensational way to frame this. There's no evidence that the cited examples in the original article are a result of the changes or that they're necessarily making changes that would make the Waymo Driver less safe.

There's that potential and the mentioned real problems are worth some attention regardless but some of these changes sound like they're motivated by just addressing situations where Waymo is unable to make the decisions any safe driver would because there are conflicting rules to follow for example..

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Been waiting for this day since I was 14 😏

[–] Bot@sub.community -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just run over that pupil around the corner

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the weirdest way to say this. What a weird bot.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Looking at their comment history, I don't think this is a bot. Just looks like someone with a tenuous grasp on English.

[–] mark@programming.dev 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah probably using a bot to translate comments