this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
126 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
2763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Besides convenience, one of the main benefits of self-driving cars is supposed to be safety.

Yet in a bizarre move, Waymo — whose self-driving cabs had been enjoying extraordinary safety metrics — has just taken steps to make its robotaxis more human-like, eroding the safety narrative that’s been central to the autonomous vehicle narrative.

Recent reporting by The Wall Street Journal observed a startling change in Waymos’ road etiquette, a new aggressive streak that would make a BMW driver blush. These include illegal U-turns, aggressive lane switching, rolling through cross walks, and running red lights.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] karashta@piefed.social 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the stupid shit I get instead of actual public transport and infrastructure. What a dumb timeline.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 3 points 21 hours ago

But that would only benefit the majority of the populace instead of making a few disgustingly wealthy men even wealthier.

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Big Insurance is playing both sides

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

In a "Our cars are faster" move?

These include illegal U-turns, aggressive lane switching, rolling through cross walks, and running red lights.

They like fines?

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Oh, they do not have to pay 'fines'

However, if the car is driverless, there is likely no punishment.

According to the Atlanta Police Standard Operating Procedure, they are told not to issue citations to driverless vehicles.

The standards read in part:

“The court system is currently unable to process traffic citations for AVs with no human operator. If the vehicle violates a traffic law, where a citation would be warranted, the officer must write a report providing the details surrounding the incident and the law that was violated.”

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/atlanta/different-rules-humans-robots-apd-says-court-system-cannot-process-citations-waymo/ZITFHSMJCVDHPIPDXSRW46ALRU/

After this incident a Waymo self-drove around a stopped school bus, there were no charges, but this article says that will change in 2026

https://abc7news.com/post/mountain-view-based-waymos-driving-cars-investigated-failing-stop-properly-school-bus-atlanta-report/18047698/

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

If this was an Onion article, the headline would have been "Waymo cars will now go through each hit pedestrian multiple times".

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

They will never make it into Europe this way.
Good thing.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Been waiting for this day since I was 14 😏

[–] vetehinen@lethallava.land 1 points 1 day ago

@tonytins@pawb.social a bit sensational way to frame this. There's no evidence that the cited examples in the original article are a result of the changes or that they're necessarily making changes that would make the Waymo Driver less safe.

There's that potential and the mentioned real problems are worth some attention regardless but some of these changes sound like they're motivated by just addressing situations where Waymo is unable to make the decisions any safe driver would because there are conflicting rules to follow for example..

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yikes. I was just in SF for work. One of the things I liked best about wayno as a pedestrian is that you could confidently step out into the road in front of them and they would always slam their breaks so hard it never hit you, and the occupants would be all pissed about it

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Risking your life to inconvenience other people is a weird form of fun I must say.

[–] dirthawker0@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I've ridden in Waymos in SF a few times and I liked the fact that they drive like a granny. If they're changing programming I won't want to ride.

[–] Bot@sub.community -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just run over that pupil around the corner

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the weirdest way to say this. What a weird bot.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Looking at their comment history, I don't think this is a bot. Just looks like someone with a tenuous grasp on English.

[–] mark@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah probably using a bot to translate comments