this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
890 points (99.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

13959 readers
1575 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Reason #39476 that the Toyota Hilux will never make it onto 'Murican shores.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Wasn't this the main selling point of the cybertruck, almost verbatim?

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 1 points 51 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

Which has been hilarious when put into practice, as seen pictured is a cybertruck leaving its rear axle behind after a collision.

Edit: I posted this as a reply to the comment of driving over someone else.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 9 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, that shit was so disgusting. Your car will just drive over the other car in case of an apocalypse. In an accident, it will just be the other guys problem

That's why i don't feel bad for the idiots who bought the Reichs mobile

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Maybe. But in reality people in Cybertruck are more prone to die from the collision than anyone in a similar sized car.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 46 minutes ago

Probably because they think seatbelts are woke.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Because...the exoskelton design does not disperse energy in a collision, so that energy is transfered to the Nazis in the cabin.

While Musk sold the idea of bulletproof windows, those would be illegal because EMTs could not use then in an emergency. Side windows are supposed to break. His syncophants at Tesla were too scared to tell him his idea was stupid, so he threw a bearing through the window live.

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Sure, but it's the "thought" that counts.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 hours ago

I remember decades ago, even before the SUV mania, a colleague of mine who was this little woman and drove a large all terrain car (in the city) because "it made her feel safe".

As it turns those vehicles had a higher likelihood for the driver to lose control and roll-over than normal cars.

It's a mix of stupid and selfishness to the point of Evil.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought of you all the other day when somebody in a newer pickup truck got behind me driving my Mazda 3. I didn't take a photo in my rear view mirror because safe driving and all that, but I felt like I was living in some kind of AI generated c/fuckcars meme.

In my mirror the front of the truck looked like a WALL the height of a grown adult with a little thin stripe of windshield above it. AND there was a big hood scoop on top of that. The little stripe of windshield was like 10'/3m behind the wall at the front of the truck too, just to make the visibility as dangerous as possible.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

yep it's absolutely ridiculous

I've got a car with 8 inches of ground clearance, that can carry 8ft dimensional lumber inside the vehicle, tow a thousand pounds of material in my relatively lightweight trailer, make it through snowstorms to ski hills and muddy fields and some ATV tracks, tow other vehicles up steep slippery inclines, haul full size BBQs and similar fully assembled inside the vehicle, and yet I pull up alongside a newer generation of the same model and their window bottom is at my eye level. or a pickup is on my ass and I can't see anything but the lower half of the grill, and its headlights are shining directly into my car and leaving a crisp white line on the headliner from through my rear window.

also obligatory fuck your Mazda too, if you have a newer one with LED headlights. if not, disregard. I miss my '08 Mazda3, even if it did suck in the snow. mostly my fault for using regular size and width winter tires. but seriously, fuck Mazda's LED headlights. I've seen it twice already this year that a pedestrian was nearly run over in a crosswalk because a driver couldn't see them due to a Mazda3 on the other side of the four way stop.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Fortunately my Mazda 3 is over a decade old and the headlights are actually too dim if anything. I need to polish the housings too. It sucks to hear that they are jumping on the annoying blinding headlight bandwagon along with some other brands though. They seem to do a lot of little things right in their designs.

I've posted a couple times about how I load 8' dimensional lumber into my Mazda3 as well, lol. Usually the people around me are driving their giant trucks and not loading jack shit into them.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

yeah you can fit 8ft lumber into a Yaris two door hatchback. it's easier than sticking out the back of a truck bed lmao

I do remember having to polish the headlights on my mazda3, as well as pretty much every car that gets to be over 10-15 years old. the Mazda headlight shape was easy, Subaru's is annoying to sand and polish because of all the curves.

I always enjoy turning heads at home depot when loading up.

it is disappointing about Mazda. they were among the first to go back to physical controls and whatnot. but unfortunately the headlights are a dealbreaker, it's just too goddamn obnoxious and dangerous

[–] Armageddon@ttrpg.network 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

I have definitely developed an appreciation for Mazda over the years. I keep toying with the idea of an MX-5 for my next car. (I live in suburban USA where driving is required, and I have a short twisty drive to work when I go into the office)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 97 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I have literally heard a Jeep owner express such an attitude. Not specifically that the other family would die and theirs would not, but that theirs would be minimally damaged and the other would be crushed.

This was on a date. I obviously did not go on a second date with her. This was a big ass red flag.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago

Which is wild because it's a Jeep.

How is it going to make it all the way to the scene of the accident?

I've never seen a more unreliable POS in my life.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It’s a surprise to hear how many truck/SUV owners are women. The theory delivered has been that women generally feel unsafe in the open due to misogynistic behavior as well as rare cases of road rage, and so a big tough car acts as a “safety blanket” - so even in traffic when surrounded, they can feel control and ownership of their space.

That’s a stretched theory but it could make sense.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

People are sold on the idea that bigger vehicles are safer. Complete lie:

  1. They take longer distances to stop

  2. They do not have to meet safety standards of cars due to a regualtory loophole.

  3. They flip much easier because of the high centre of mass, and this is worse with stuff in the truck. It gets much worse with the lifting trend. So lifters then space out the wheels, which is not what the suspension was designed for and suspension arms and hubs crack.

  4. Some have 16 ft front blind spots, people are running over their own children in driveways.

  5. They are worse in snow and ice, because chunky man tires are not winter rated and heavier vehicles slide off roads easier.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

the middle aged white woman with bleached blonde hair and designer clothes in a big white SUV is such an interesting trend

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You clearly don't know many fairly well-off (or aspirationally well-off) women / mothers, if this is surprising to you.

Its not a theory. Its... many of them will just tell you that, verbatim, if you ask them.

"I just don't feel safe in a smaller car."

Its a primary component of the marketing angle the US entire auto industry has been using to market to 'the affluent careerist modern woman' / 'responsible and practical mom' for ... two decades now?

Big car = You are safe.

(and stylish or powerful or practical or eco-conscious or rugged or w/e other adjective)

For moms, an SUV is a minivan from the 90s, but with more style and performance.

For yuppie women, an SUV is a luxury sedan or coupe, but tank-sized, more authority commanding, more intimidating.

(Modern US SUVs are routinely as large or larger than actual M4 Sherman tanks from WW2, sans cannon barrel, if you go by volume, 'bounding box')

... I'm surprised that you're surprised by this.


With women truck drivers, I can understand that somewhat more, as you apparently just don't know too many white trash women, who are disproportionately Republican.

Makes sense here on lemmy.

For the entire MAGA type of people, well, trucks are real cars, everything else is "gay" or at least not as strong, or capable.

... even though that hardly ever actually is the case in any kind of practical or realistic terms.


Its all marketing, all appealing to the consumer, in ways said consumer both does and does not realize they are being appealed to.

It's all about how buying, "owning", and operating some kind of vehicle makes you feel, and what your exact choice, what message you think that sends to other people.

Here, I found this after writing my first section, and its almost verbatim what I said:

https://agirlsguidetocars.com/women-driving-suv-sales

Safety matters most for women

Married and single women love SUVs for many reasons. They are multi-purpose and, depending on your needs, come in varying sizes. If you have a family, an SUV is easy to drive and still provides room for the kids, the soccer balls and your groceries – and it’s so much cooler than a minivan.

For single women, the same multi-purpose features are attractive. The interior of an SUV is spacious and the elevation in the vehicle provides a better view of the road. The SUVs are also durable, reliable and most of all safe. And safety ranks higher with women than with men. Maybe it’s our nurturing nature – whether we’re nurturing our kids or our friends.

Yeah that's from 2016.

This has just been how SUV marketing in particular has worked basically since I got out of high school. almost 20 years ago now.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

kinda wild how weaponized psychology is, and everyone kind of thinks they're immune to it themselves till one day it smacks em in the face

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago

A colleague of mine who was a little woman, decades ago and even before the SUV craze, drove a car like that (which was stupidly large for her size) because it made her feel safe.

Years later I found out such cars were more likely to roll-over than other cars.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This honestly sounds likely. My step-mother, in the 80s, said something like this when she got an SUV (before the term had even kicked in). She felt safer and more confident being higher than the rest of the traffic. I "get it", but it's a race to the bottom (or top?). Maybe if they get tall enough, some of us can get ultra efficient and low profile wedge shaped cars and just dodge underneath these gigantic abominations.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We need to see more cars with a wedge shape, extremely tough body, and explosive flipping mechanism.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Taller vehicles, driven standing up like a speedboat. Hurrr

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 3 points 22 hours ago

I don't think it's a gender thing at all, people just like the higher seating position and the upper hand in the case of a collision. I'm personally a small hatch guy, but every time I've asked somebody why they want a bigger car despite not carrying anything those are the two reasons I got back, gender regardless.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

I also stopped dating someone immediately after their attitude on SUVs came out. Dealbreaker

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What is the perfect bumper height to make sure I decapitate a ten year old?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

you can add cool wheels to grind that child first. Completely legal.

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Completely legal.

You gotta be kidding! Quote from the dutch -mandatory- annual car inspection (known as APK) which is actually an European directive, So it applies to every EU country


External safety including wheel and side guards 

1. Passenger cars must not have sharp parts 
that could pose a risk of personal injury 
to other road users in the event of a collision.

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

Haha you think EU people want to buy this? Naw, this is good ol American murder tires.

[–] rainwall@piefed.social 15 points 1 day ago

Dodge ram and up.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

I mean that's really what you want to do.

You wouldn't want her to live life as a cripple so better to just bump it up a little bit and ensure a clean death.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Around here, the bigger the cars gets, the lower the speed limit. In the end, the harm to a pedestrian equals car mass multiplied with car speed. One goes up so the other one goes down to compensate. Have fun driving that tank like a snail.

[–] randy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where is "here" for you? I've never heard of a place with variable speed limits.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here is Western Europe. It's not variable. It's the new limit for everyone. 30 kph popping up everywhere now.

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm confused, you said the bigger the vehicle then the lower the speed limit in your original comment.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

it says "the cars" as in the average car on the road.

[–] GunValkyrie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

"Around here the bigger the average car on the road, the lower the speed limit."

The question still stands. He said the bigger the car the lower the speed limit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] _chris@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes, your average cybertruck owner.

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Works better for pick-up trucks in general, a cybertruck will probably kill you along with the people in the other car.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Personally I just look for a vehicle with the brightest headlights. /s

load more comments
view more: next ›